Posts tonen met het label magic. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label magic. Alle posts tonen
zaterdag 11 juni 2016
Today's Review: Warcraft
Up to date again.
Warcraft - Recensie
Judging from the on-again, off-again subtitle The Beginning, it's clear Universal Studios hopes for this first entry into the Warcraft film franchise not to be the last. A ton of money has been thrown at the screen on a project that has been in development for nigh a decade to entice both fans and ignorant audiences alike, but the best intentions regardless, it's unlikely the film will sit well with the latter demographic, while it remains to be seen whether it'll be to the liking of the former. After all, the gamers are simple spectators on a quest played by Duncan Jones and his team, rather than their own. General viewers meanwhile get treated to a grand and supposedly rich fantasy universe for which they have a tough time developing a feeling, considering Warcraft only forms the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
The World of Warcraft is vast and extensive, yet a film franchise has to start somewhere explaining it all. The Beginning addresses the origin of the wars between Orcs and Men, so it is said in the opening narration. Which also proves a major spoiler to the movie's own plot, considering the outcome of it all has already been determined. While much of the movie follows a minority of Orcs attempting to establish a truce with the world of Men they just invaded, with that opening statement in mind, there's few narrative surprises in store for us. Which doesn't mean we don't feel for this peaceful, noble Orc warriors, who find themselves a pawn of a sinister force's greater schemes to suck this world dry of life like it did their own home before. Brought to life by the latest motion capture innovations, the movie follows the new path of creating convincing digital characters based on intense acting performances, in the same style as the recent Planet of the Apes movie so successfully. It works, as these are some of the finest Orcs we've seen on the big screen thus far.
Alas, the same cannot be said for their human counterparts. The noble knights and conniving warlocks of Azeroth aren't nearly as interesting to behold as their fresh enemies, a victim of both dull, generic fantasy writing and uninspired performances. Though there's definitely a pool of talent assembled here, none of these actors truly seemed to have affinity with the exotic subject matter. All the silly spells and swashbuckling sword moves can't change that, and there's plenty of both to go around. In fact, Warcraft fanatics will recognize plenty of everything from their beloved games much to their enjoyment and to the detriment of ours, the casual viewers not acquainted with this realm. Especially in the first thirty minutes of the movie, the plot travels from one outlandish location to the next without allowing us much room to absorb it all, get to know its rules or develop a sense of geography for the whole. While names like Ironforge and Stormwind are no doubt iconic nomenclature to the fans, they never rise above the sound of generic fantasy to inexperienced ears. Same can be said for the other inhabitants of Azeroth: Dwarves, Elves and the like are briefly seen here and there but otherwise play no part.
Undoubtedly there's more to the World of Warcraft than what's shown here, but for the general audience, what realms are served never really click. It all looks fabulous but none of it makes us truly care on the same level as the Lord of the Rings movies did. Whether the fans will absorb this take on their beloved franchise as much as they did their interactive equivalent remains to be seen, but the studio better hope they do. Other audiences at best get a decent two hours of generic fantasy entertainment out of it, but nobody will be converted to the Warcraft cause. Which, considering the cost of this hugely expensive movie, might easily suggest The Beginning will also prove the end for the Warcraft film franchise.
donderdag 19 maart 2015
Today's Review: Cinderella
Finally, another review up!
Cinderella review
Okay, so this movie serves us a most oldfashioned fairy tale imaginable and displays a shockingly conservative view on the role of women. Nobody will deny it. But if you can swallow that, it's indeed quite as magical a movie experience as it aims to be (and not even in obnoxious 3D, for a change!). I don't think the studio is excusing reverting to old social values, it just acknowledges a classic tale without feeling the need to utterly change it by updating it to appease a modern audience. And that's not necessarily a bad thing, as this movie proves much more enjoyable than similar recent rehashes of old glory like Maleficent and Alice in Wonderland, which were quite bland and forgetful despite making the female protagonists tough and independent. Both qualities are sorely lacking in the victimized Cinderella, I admit. But this movie seems to say 'Oh, the heck with it! Let's embrace such ridiculously backward gender patterns for a change and acknowledge our true classics as they used to be, not as they should be today!' If Disney meant to say explicitly that women are either weak willed victims or total bitches with this movie, you honestly think grand dames of cinema like Cate Blanchett and Helena Bonham Carter, let alone promising new faces like Lily James, Holliday Grainger or Sophie McShera, would voluntarily have signed up for this slap in the face of their sex? I think they just recognized the obviously outdated romantic plot for what it was and decided to run with it just to enjoy getting a chance to play such outrageous roles, so seldom seen today. And for the better, since if they occurred more often, that would indeed be suspicious and uncalled for. But it's not wrong to indulge in reactionary storytelling every once in a while, to appreciate just how much female roles have changed since the days these types of women were seen everywhere on the big screen.
Plus, the movie is at least a little modern in other regards. There's a black guy playing the captain of the royal guard in a court full of white folk. And him and the prince certainly seem like close chums. That wouldn't have happened in the original animated classic for sure. What a long way we've come!
zaterdag 14 juni 2014
Today's Triple News: magic Aquaman of the galaxy
There's news, and then there's more news:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156134/meer_character_posters_voor_guardians_of_the_galaxy
Got a mail from my editor at a quarter to midnight. Marvel posted the last two character posters online and he though I should finish what I started by posting them on MovieScene. I couldn't agree more, even though I was about to go to bed instead (that'll teach me not to check my e-mail at so late an hour!). All part of the job, even though it's only a voluntary position. This pair of posters continues the eye catching colourful, flashy and distinctly space opera vibe carrying trend the earlier two (of Rocket & Groot and Gamora, if you recall) started. Drax ominously has his back turned to us, amply revealing his daggers, while enemy warships approach in the distance. It obviously isn't the most inspired piece of advertising (compare the final poster for The Chronicles of Riddick for instance), but it looks decent enough and adequately showcases his muscles and (to my mind, lousy) war paint. In Star-Lord's case, battle has commenced and he's resorted to using his futuristic double ray gun in the heat of battle, his ship flying in the background. Am I glad Drax already is the muscleman on this film, so we don't get to see a topless pin-up of the protagonist in an attempt to cater to the female demographic too obscenely. Of course the obligatory shirtless scene will follow somewhere in the course of the movie, as it's all part of the Hollywood strategy to draw girl audiences to what is otherwise (unjustly) considered a largely male attracting movie experience. At least the trailers indicate Gamora can't keep her shirt on all the time either. They better keep that bit in to ensure a sexually equal atmosphere.
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156165/game_of_thrones_schrijver_pent_magic
If you've done one fantasy gig you can do another. I bet that's what Hollywood was thinking in this scenario. Of course, there's an epic difference between Game of Thrones and this upcoming Magic: The Gathering movie. One's based on a series of books, the other on a roleplaying card game. One is better suited for television, while the other gets the silver screen treatment. One has conquered the hearts and minds of a global audience, while the other still needs to prove it can attract bigger audiences than just its loyal fanbase, shedding its 'nerd' stigma. The latter starts with a good writer, and at least Cogman has proven himself just that on Game of Thrones. Still, his resumé is more or less confined to those writing credits only, so he can't be called the most experienced of screen writers. You'd think he'd feel like doing something other than fantasy for a change, but apparently he prefers to stay in that comfort zone, even though this is a wholly different kind of fantasy (or so I think, since I don't know jack squat about the Magic card game; are there any cards with depictions of twincest or overtly gruesome dismemberment?). Or maybe he's just not comfortable or interested yet in expanding his so far genre restricted mindset. Could be for the best, since there's still a fair bit of writing on Game of Thrones to finish and we wouldn't want him to be distracted by the real world too much.
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156168/jason_momoa_mogelijk_aquaman
Someone who has seemingly already finished on Game of Thrones - he's not the only one - is Jason Momoa. Khal Drogo has been dead for three seasons now, so Momoa has moved on, and as it appears, in the right direction career wise. His involvement with some DC project or other has been the stuff of whispers and speculations for seven months now and it's doubtful he can maintain claiming ignorance for much longer. Is he gonna be Aquaman? That seems most likely, though other characters have been suggested too. Momoa certainly doesn't look like Aquaman, but in this digital age that is not much of an obstacle to speak off. Bradler Cooper doesn't look like Rocket Raccoon after all. I'm sure an expert make-up job alone would suffice to mask any dissimilarities with what fanboys perceive to be the 'good look' for Aquaman. I'm more worried about the many character set-ups that are currently slated to appear in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (such a unnecessarily lengthy title!). If I'm not mistaken, this now makes three additional super heroes in a movie that largely revolves around two others. And then there's still the supervillain(s) to contend with. Already feels like an overly padded and crowded movie, which unfortunately is a prevailing tendency in contemporary comic book adaptations, done by studios driven by grandiose ideas of universe building. Several recent Marvel movies suffered in terms of quality due to these tactics, and as DC is in haste trying to keep up with its rival, the same mistakes appear to be made in the process. Maybe it wouldn't be such a bad idea to take a note from Game of Thrones when the number of characters becomes too large to manage properly? Though it would be a bit unfair to Momoa if he suffered a similarly untimely demise once more.
Labels:
aquaman,
bryan cogman,
comic book,
DC,
game of thrones,
guardians of the galaxy,
jason momoa,
justice league,
magic,
magic: the gathering,
Marvel,
moviescene,
poster,
superheroes
zaterdag 15 maart 2014
Today's News: multiple directors interested in Marvel's strange project
Another older bit of news from my hand:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/154380/meerdere_regisseurs_in_de_race_voor_doctor_strange
If the top boss of Marvel has a personal favorite, it's only a matter of time before said character gets himself a movie. Doctor Strange has been rumoured and reported on for a few years now, so it's about time the project really got going officially. So far most "news" has addressed the issue of who should play the titular character, with many names suggested (most interesting to my ears would be Viggo Mortensen, but fat chance of that happening!), but over the last few weeks the matter of a director has taken precedence instead. Marvel CEO Kevin Feige has so far shot down almost all possible contenders, but not the latest trio of rumoured names up for the gig: Mark Andrews, Scott Derrickson and Jonathan Levine. Each of them has dabbled in the fantastic, the horrific or the supernatural before, so all of them seem like they might fit the bill for directing a film about the Sorcerer Supreme battling various mystical, otherworldy adversaries that seek to claim humanity's souls or its dimensional territory. Levine is known for both horror and comedy (Warm Bodies, 50/50), applying both of them in a decently offbeat approach. Derrickson was responsible for one big winter blockbuster movie (the remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still) which did well enough at the box office but proved disappointing for both audience and critics: he has shown more substantial skills in directing horror films though, which is not a bad thing considering the interdimensional terrors and grizzly ghouls among Strange's many antagonists. Andrews has only done one movie and it was animated (Brave), but it was the most lucrative of the bunch and also a definite work of fantasy and sorcery, bordering the substance of Doctor Strange the closest thematically. My money is on Andrews. It wouldn't be the first time a Pixar director went on to do a major motion picture, though the financially disastrous John Carter, directed by Finding Nemo/Wall-E veteran Andrew Stanton, is probably not an example studio execs want to be reminded of. Nevertheless, Andrews brought in the most dough and knows the genre best. However, since Doctor Strange is unlike any other Marvel project, the studio might very well decide to do things differently and pick the least expected director for the job. I gotta admit, the term 'unlike any other Marvel movie' keeps coming back, having prior been used to describe both Thor and the upcoming Guardians of the Galaxy. The more movies get made that are 'unlike any other Marvel movie', the less impact the phrase carries. With a moniker like 'Marvel', you can always expect the unexpected after all. Doctor Strange may be a weird character, he's no more implausible or odd than Norse gods in present day America or talking interstellar raccoons and trees. Now hopefully Mortensen will see that too and decide playing such a strange role is right up his alley.
zaterdag 14 september 2013
Today's News: exit Potter, enter Scamander
Breaking News from MovieScene (unfortunately posted a day too late since I was gone yesterday):
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/150016/harry_potter_spin-off_aangekondigd
You know it had to happen sooner or later. Potter was much too profitable and is still hugely popular, so they couldn't just let it rest. More money is to be made here most definitely, therefore ignoring the franchise was never an option, leaving only two routes to take: rebooting Potter for the movies, which would have been too controversial since the last movie is less than two years old, or exploring the Potterverse in more detail via some other way. I'm glad Warner Bros. went for the most sensible option, since we'll be getting something new now, which is simultaneously the stuff of fantasy audiences are already comfortable and familiar with. I'm also glad to see Rowling is connected more closely than she ever has been before, doing her first bit of genuine screenwriting. Say what you will about being overprotective of her brainchild, a bit of creative and quality control on her part certainly can't hurt this upcoming second franchise.
But will this work on screen? I haven't read Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (yet), so I can't truly speak from experience, but what I know about the book is that it's basically meant as a fun tie-in to Potter proper, an encyclopedic textbook about various fictional creatures devoid of a specific narrative (though with hand written notes of Harry and his friends), never meant to be adapted into a movie or any similar audiovisual formats. That means there still is a lot of writing to be done here before the project's plot is in decent shape to start filming. In fact, at this point nearly everything in terms of story has yet to be conceived other than the protagonist, Newt Scamander, and the assorted magical creatures he deals with. Therefore, I think it's highly unwise Warner immediately decided to make an ungoing series of films based solely on this single book. It would have been more tactically sound to start with one movie and see the results first. After all, more than one recent franchise has had the misfortune of being the victim of overly enthusiastic corporate planning in advance and just ending up being dropped after disappointing box office results, thus losing a lot of money as pre-production on the sequel had already begun. Nevertheless, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them seems a fascinating project containing those elements we've come to love most about Potter: magic, unusual locations and vistas and odd creatures of all shapes and sizes. This time, it takes place seven decades before the events of Potter, so as a bonus we'll get an undoubtedly lavish period look to the piece, which is always most welcome. Though it's too early to get overexcited just yet, it's guaranteed Rowling's next baby is one to keep track of as it grows and grows. I'll be sure to do just that!
zondag 11 augustus 2013
Today's Double News: Now the Panopticon Sees You
Here's two bits of news I posted on MovieScene yesterday:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/149192/now_you_see_me_2_in_de_planning
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/149193/tarsem_singh_regisseert_sci-fi_film_the_panopticon
Panopticons! I like panopticons! I used the term in my master thesis on science fiction films between 1968 and 1977 (with Hal 9000 as the prime example of a panopticon, but certainly not the only one from that era). From the plot synopsis given of this film, I don't see the panopticon yet (it might be the protagonist himself, but if so, he has forgotten it), but I'm pretty sure it'll be made clear in the movie itself. I'm looking forward to this film, I have liked Tarsem Singh's films so far, or at least the two I've seen, The Fall and Immortals (but then, he hasn't made many movies at all). Granted, he's all style over substance, a visual artist though not so much a narrative genius, but his visuals are gripping and evocative enough to keep intriguing me. It'll be fascinating to see him do some more science fiction-ey fare no doubt. So far there's little more to say on the topic, since all we have is a director and a brief plot breakdown. I'll keep track of this one for sure though.
I still haven't seen Now You See Me. I wish I had that one night at Pathé de Munt, where they launched 3,000 euros in 5-euro bills into the theatre when the same thing happened in the actual movie, as a promotional stunt. Now that is what I call a convincing 3-D effect! Nevertheless, the mixed things I heard about this movie have kept me from seeing it so far in favor of other films and I'll probably miss it entirely as it's on its last legs here. It seems the movie doesn't need my money though (if it were to get any at all, since I don't have to pay for my dose of movies anymore, like the regular audience does), it's doing well enough without me. But that doesn't justify rushing a redundant sequel into theatres, though the term 'redundancy' is itself redundant when Hollywood smells money. They better be careful not to go overboard in terms of budget like the big blockbusters Now You See Me is currently beating at the box office. After all, the film may not have been that expensive - though 75 million dollars isn't exactly cheap either - but it has a surprising abundance of big names (Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, Jesse Eisenberg, Melanie Laurent and Mark Ruffalo among them), and if those need to be back for the second installment, they'll want more money: it's an inescapable natural law. Of course they can go the alternative route and reintroduce the same concept with a new cast of characters, but I doubt the audience would take kindly to that if it's really titled Now You See Me 2, which also remains to be seen. In fact, just like is the case with The Panopticon, there's not enough confirmed information to go on just yet in order to either discard this sequel as a bad idea (though many, if not most, sequels are), or to hail it as a welcome addition to the first film. Right now, we simply see nothing yet.
maandag 13 augustus 2012
Pixar finally fully Disneyfied
Brave: ***/*****, or 6/10
It was a
given Pixar's long running winning streak of top movies had to come
to an end sooner or later, and judging from the quality of the latest
addition to the Pixar oeuvre, Brave, that time has now finally
come. After two years of releasing sequels only – one very good
(Toy Story 3 (2010)), the other not so much (Cars 2
(2011)) – and with the studio focusing on similar milking dry of
past glory (for example, next year's Monsters University and
the already announced Toy Story 4 and
even Finding Nemo 2...),
Brave was supposed to have been the last apparent vestige of
Pixar's once supreme creative ingenuity, but unfortunately the final
product feels lacking in almost every respect and thus only endorses
the fact Pixar's days of making original animation of the highest
quality, unsurpassed by its various competitors in the industry (Blue
Sky and Dreamworks Animation its closest rivals, this year entering
the field with Ice Age 4 and Madagascar 3
respectively), are now truly behind them. It was feared this would
happen ever since Disney officially took over the fledgling studio
back in 2006, but several fabulous Pixar projects already in the
making (including Ratatouille (2007) and Wall·E (2008)
held off this imminent quality deterioration for a few years.
Whatever deals Pixar and Disney have officially stated to have made
concerning Pixar's creative control, judging from Brave and
the upcoming slate of sequel abundance, Disney has finally managed to
get Pixar in line with its own creative agenda. Unfortunately, the
audience turns out to be the biggest loser in the process.
Like so
many of Disney's classic (and less classic) animated films, Brave
revolves around a young princess and her struggle to fulfill her
dreams and life ambitions despite the wishes of her parents/guardians
who would instead see her become someone she never wanted to be. The
princess in question is named Merida (voiced by Kelly Macdonald) and
is the eldest child and only daughter of the Scottish monarchs King
Fergus (performed with audible joy by Billy Connolly) and Queen
Elinor (played by Emma Thompson), ruling over several clans in the
ancient Scottish highlands in an unspecified period in history, or
put otherwise, in the typical magic kingdom Disney does best, though
this kind of fantasy setting is new to Pixar. While Elinor is a
genuinely regal lady of royal blood, the boorish loudmouth Fergus
obsessed with bear hunting – especially the huge demon bear Mor'Du
that once took his leg – seems her exact opposite, though the pair
of them is deeply in love regardless: Merida has inherited the best
of both worlds, and has grown into a beautiful and intelligent but
adventurous and overly independent young woman who does not take
kindly to being told what to do and much prefers typical male
occupations like hunting, hiking and horse riding over the feminine
arts like poetry and embroidery her mother would prefer to see her
spend her time with. In fact, the strict and stern Elinor tries hard
to shape her daughter into the perfect princess, at all times
directing her attention to the social graces of the Scottish
nobility, but much to her chagrin (and to Fergus' enjoyment, as well
as our own) Merida's tomboyish nature always wins out. Merida herself
has little qualms over being told what to do by her dominant mother,
until the day she learns the clan leaders are visiting the royal
castle to have their firstborn sons compete for the princess' hand in
marriage.
Unlike
the Disney princesses of old, who usually couldn't wait to marry any
number of interchangeable charming princes, Merida does not take
kindly to be auctioned off and means to take her destiny into her own
hands. One could argue the whole notion of a princess fighting her
imminent wedlock instead of willfully embracing it could be taken as
a narrative role-reversal in an attempt by Pixar to pay homage to
the age-old Disney tradition. However, the solution to Merida's
marital issues ultimately fail to feel like any sort of intertextual
nod: in fact, it feels more like the marriage of the formerly free
spirited Pixar and the proudly traditional Disney has reigned in the
creative temperament of the former to keep it more in line with the
boringly conservative ideological policy of the latter. Whereas
Merida might win the freedom to choose her own partner, Pixar
apparently is only allowed to produce fully Disneyesque movies, at
least for the foreseeable future.
In the
case of Brave, the combination of princess and marriage is
hardly the only element present in the plot to remind us of past
Disney films. The film goes so far as to incorporate a number of
songs, much like the ones that used to dominate the soundtrack of
many a Disney classic (think Pocahontas (1995), Beauty and
the Beast (1991) and The Little Mermaid (1989)), except
you shouldn't expect to see these songs win any Academy Awards
anytime soon, considering their rather poor and forgetful quality
(which fortunately does mean they won't get stuck in your head for
many days to come as they used to do). The lyrics literally enter one
ear only to immediately exit the other, but they go a little like
'I'm a Scottish lass, hair all red – Firing arrows makes
me glad – But now my mom wants me to wed – I
wannae, so now I'm sad – Oooh,
I wish my mom were dead';
the usual Disney stuff really, except far from catchy, all for the
best.
Warning! Spoilers! Of course, a headstrong teenage girl like Merida doesn't mean to get suckered into holy matrimony so easily and tries to get out of it by proving her superiority in archery over her prospected suitors. Despite her remarkable skills at shooting arrows this attempt fails because she breaks clan rules by competing in this wholly male tournament, much to the dismay of the clan leaders. When she gets into a huge argument with her outraged mother over her conduct unbecoming a princess of the realm, she simply makes a run for it and flees into the forest, where she encounters a strange elderly woman masquerading as a wood carver, but of course an obvious witch, though not as stereotypically evil or sinister as Disney witches once tended to be, opting instead for the routine of the bumbling old lady impaired by memory loss. Merida agrees to buy all her carvings if the aged sorceress supplies her with a single spell to change her mother's mind, but like all princesses making deals with magic hags, she doesn't quite get what she hoped for, as she sees her mother transformed into a bear. This unfortunate metamorphosis is made even more unfortunate by reminding us of the much maligned Disney feature Brother Bear (2003), a movie not deserving the title of 'Disney Classic' at all, and Brave does an equally adequate job at making us wish we had forgotten all about that film by also making the plot of a human transforming into a bear feel wholesomely underwhelming.
Since
Fergus has little love for bears, especially in his own castle,
Merida must smuggle her now furry mother out to the safety of the
woods in a scene devoid of suspense and filled with silly gags
instead. Afterwards, Merida sets out to reverse the spell with her
mother, a human in the body of a bear, in tow, learning that if she
does not break the curse within two days her mother will become a
real bear permanently. In a few all too brief scenes Elinor
demonstrates a loss of her human faculties in favor of bear
instincts, threatening Merida's plight to save her (and in fact, her
very life), but for most of this mother-daughter bonding experience,
director Mark Andrews opts for levity instead, making the bear feel
less like Merida's queen mum and more like a hairy sidekick the likes
of Chewbacca (except less funny). Most of their time in the forest is
spent showing Merida's ability to survive in the wild as opposed to
her stiff mother's total inexperience with outdoor activities, bear
instincts not withstanding, which leads to various scenes intended as
comedy, but feeling too forced to be truly comically successful. In
the long run, a cure against the bear spell is the objective and when
Merida finds a method she must smuggle her mother back into the
castle, keeping her out of her father's spear, while she herself must
take care not to fall prey to Mor'Du, who also turns out to be
royalty cursed to be a bear for all eternity (seems like it was the
witch's answer to any problem). Eventually she succeeds in the nick
of time and all's well that ends well: Elinor is human again and
Merida is no longer forced to marry, all because of – or in spite
of? – Merida's bravery to rebel against traditions but her
willingness to accept responsibility when things go awry. Plot wise,
it's clear Pixar didn't turn out very brave.
In fact,
Brave is most fun when its characters don't act particularly
brave at all. Merida's rebellious shenanigans in the first half of
the film are far more enjoyable than her tiresome and predictable
efforts to set things right in the second half. King Fergus steals
the show not by being brave (though he's certainly shown to be
capable of heroism when protecting his clan from the terrifying
Mor'Du on several occasions), but by being a somewhat childish ruler
apt at telling compelling tall tales, drinking and fighting his
fellow clan leaders in an overall devil-may-care attitude that makes
it clear where Merida gets it from. Similarly, the rulers of clans
Macintosh (only one of many little Steve Jobs tributes in this film),
MacGuffin (cute Hitchcock reference there) and Dingwall are most
convincing and most appreciable when they're shown engaging in petty
bickering and arguing as they're overly proudly introducing they're
equally not so brave sons to Fergus' court. It's the first half of
the movie, when the various zany Scotsmen and their families are
introduced and compete over Merida's affections, where Brave
witnesses its strongest moments. As soon as the movie enters a
more serious tone, at least as much as it can with a bear acting like
a human being, spectator's interest in the overall plot starts to
wane. Still, there's something to enjoy for everybody in Brave.
However, it's just much less than we're used to from a supposedly
original Pixar product. For adults, especially those that have seen
their fair share of both Disney and Pixar films, it's certainly not
the worn out story. They'll have to make due with several good jokes
in the first 45 minutes, and the excellent visual look throughout
(after all, the technological prowess of computer animation continues
to deliver staggering results, and at least Brave makes ample
uses of these). Such impressive visuals are however hindered by
unnecessary 3-D effects, which add little moments of true depth but
make a rather dark film look even more colourless.
In
conclusion, Brave is the definite proof for the growing
numbers of naysayers who predicted the end of the Age of Pixar at the
hands of insidious Disneyfication from within years ago. There's
simply nothing brave about mindlessly copying Disney's style, which
by itself hasn't yielded a truly good film since the late nineties.
For the moment, with the plethora of sequels in store for us, a
further loss of quality seems inevitable for Pixar. Hopefully they'll
pull yet another miraculous Toy Story 3 out of their hat, but
this seems wishful thinking. In the meantime, until another
non-sequel is produced, Brave will be lamented as Pixar's last
original film, one that simply didn't prove to contain much
originality. In the current Disney/Pixar mindset, Brave 2 seems
a more likely thing to happen...
And
watch the trailer here:
Labels:
animation,
bear,
billy connolly,
brave,
emma thompson,
kelly macdonald,
magic,
mark andrews,
merida,
pixar,
princess,
scotland,
scots,
witch
zaterdag 4 februari 2012
Stardust
Rating: ****/*****, or 8/10
Een
sprookje zonder franchise-ambities
Dankzij
het succes van de Lord of the Rings en Harry Potter
reeksen is de interesse voor het fantasy-genre weer helemaal terug
van weggeweest, na in de jaren negentig grotendeels afwezig te zijn
gebleven. Aangezien het wapengekletter en getover van beide grootse
franchises vele miljoenen oplevert dicteert de hebzuchtige
marktstrategie van Hollywood dat er meer van hetzelfde stramien
gemaakt moet worden om maar zoveel mogelijk winst uit het genre te
persen. Tot dusverre heeft deze tactiek echter nog geen boeiende
films opgeleverd, met het beschamend slechte Eragon als
voorlopig dieptepunt. Die film had studio Fox een nieuwe
blockbuster-reeks moeten opleveren, maar na deze flop valt dat
(gelukkig!) te vergeten. Over een paar maanden is het de beurt aan
The Golden Compass om het op fantasie beluste publiek opnieuw
te bekoren en hopelijk een kassucces te worden, of Eragon te
volgen in de bodemloze put der vergetelheid.
Te
midden van alle beslissende slagen tussen Goed en Kwaad in
verbluffend mooi vormgegeven fantastische landschappen vol
merkwaardige digitale wezens die de recente golf aan fantasy-films
ons voorschotelt vergeten we bijna dat het ook anders kan. Gelukkig
is er nu Stardust om ons hieraan te herinneren. Dit keer geen
overdreven episch verhaal of overdaad aan peperdure effecten, maar
een bescheiden relaas over een verlegen jongeman die, om het hart van
zijn geliefde te winnen, in een magische wereld terechtkomt en daar
zijn ware aard ontdekt. Het geheel is voorzien van een aanstekelijk
humoristische toon die in het merendeel van het fantasy-genre
ontbreekt en impliceert dat dit sprookje, ondanks enkele wijze
levenslessen die het behelst, niet al te serieus genomen hoeft te
worden.
Tristan
Thorn (de heerlijk naïeve Charlie Cox) groeit op in het dorpje Wall,
dat, zoals de naam al aangeeft, gekenmerkt wordt door een muur; een
gat hierin zou een portaal naar een magisch koninkrijk vormen. Om de
liefde van het hooghartige verwende kreng Victoria (Sienna Miller) te
verkrijgen betreedt Tristan de toverachtige wereld, op zoek naar een
gevallen ster om aan haar te doneren in ruil voor haar hand. Echter,
de ster blijkt een wonderschone dame genaamd Yvaine (Claire Danes
schittert als dit hemels lichaam), die geenszins van sprake is een
huwelijkspresentje te worden en veel liever terugkeert naar het
firmament waar ze vandaan kwam. Op de vlucht voor de boosaardige heks
Lamia (Michelle Pfeiffer, die zich zichtbaar kostelijk amuseert als
de kwade feeks) die Yvaines hart nodig heeft om haar jeugd terug te
krijgen, moet het duo samenwerken, wat uiteraard leidt tot Tristans
herziene kijk op liefde en Yvaines inzicht dat een menselijk leven
met de juiste persoon zo slecht nog niet is.
De zaak
wordt gecompliceerd als de arrogante prins Septimus (een overtuigend
sinistere Mark Strong) ook op de ster blijkt te jagen, die hem zal
helpen de troon van zijn vader over te nemen, als hij de competitie
met zijn broers overleeft. De oude koning (prima kleine rol voor
fossiel Peter O'Toole) zag graag dat zijn zoons elkaar afmaakten in
hun strijd om de heerschappij, waar Septimus in uitblonk, maar hij
moet ook het kroonjuweel zien te bemachtigen dat Yvaine uit de lucht
haalde en zij nu om haar nek draagt. Uiteraard belanden Tristan en
Yvaine op hun vlucht in de ene na de andere fantastische belevenis,
met als hoogtepunt een treffen met de alom gevreesde luchtpiraat
kapitein Shakespeare (Robert de Niro, eindelijk weer in een rol die
wel in het geheugen blijft hangen, zij het om andere redenen dan we
van hem gewend zijn) die er een geheim nichterig leven op nahoudt.
In
regie van de talentvolle Matthew Vaughn ontwikkelt Stardust
zich tot een heerlijk sprookje dat zich niet bezighoudt met Grote
Zaken en epische queestes waarvan het fantasy-genre zich
recentelijk al te vaak bedient. Vaughn toont zich een kundig
regisseur, wat opmerkelijk is aangezien dit slechts zijn tweede film
is. Het is Stardust echter niet aan te zien, want de film kan
zich ondanks zijn redelijk lage budget moeiteloos meten met de meeste
grote blockbusters van de laatste jaren. Desondanks laat Stardust
ook hier en daar een steekje vallen en zijn de visuele effecten niet
altijd even vlekkeloos, maar door het amusante verhaal, het prima
acteerwerk en de kostelijke humor is dat snel vergeven. Vooral dat
laatste aspect is een openbaring, want het werd node gemist in het
genre tot dusverre. De humor in Stardust neemt bij vlagen
satirische vormen aan, spelend met de bekende weg in het genre door
overdreven variaties op de heks, de prins en dergelijke archetypen
neer te zetten, zonder de typische glans van een sprookje te
verliezen.
Stardust
is een bekoorlijke vertelling uit het rijk der fantasie voor jong
en oud dat de heden ten dage heersende conventies van het genre op de
hak neemt zoals het al even geslaagde The Princess Bride dat
twintig jaar eerder deed. De film laat zien dat een grootscheepse,
overdadige aanpak niet noodzakelijk is om een fantasy-film die
een wijd publiek aan moet spreken te vervaardigen. En waar teveel
andere genrefilms (zoals het eerder genoemde Eragon en het al
even deplorabele The Chronicles of Narnia) de laatste tijd
overduidelijke franchise-aspiraties hebben en slechts dienen als
opstapje voor een hele reeks soortgelijke meuk om in te haken op
recent succes binnen dit genre, laat Stardust blijken daar
geen behoefte aan te hebben door in twee uur tijd een prima
afgerond verhaal te vertellen dat duidelijk geen vervolg zal krijgen en dat bovendien niet nodig heeft.
Hopelijk neemt Hollywood Vaughns boodschap aan en richt ze zich
minder op product-marketing en meer op inhoud, dan volgt dat gewenste
succes ongetwijfeld later wel.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)














