Posts tonen met het label Ridley Scott. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Ridley Scott. Alle posts tonen

woensdag 2 juli 2014

Today's Triple News: an exodus of empires at the Apocalypse




The quest to post new news continues:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156389/eerste_teaser_boardwalk_empire_seizoen_5

Looks good. Looks positively final too. A sense of foreboding and imminent closure is clearly instilled with all the little hints at the show's ending found here. 'All Empires Fall', not very subtle, but it can't hurt to let the viewer know this grand show will soon come to an end. And am I gonna miss it. Boardwalk Empire is definitely on my Top-3 of currently running shows. Spectacular production values, compelling writing, intriguing mix of fiction and history and some of the loveliest acting you'll find on telly these days: what's not to like here? But as always, all good things must come to an end. Besides, I haven't even seen season 4 yet, so the finale is not so close for me as for most others. It's a nice thing the teaser makes it clear some of my favorite characters are still alive - some of them just had to be, according to the history books - but I can take a spoiler or two, as they are unavoidable when you're in a line of (unpaid) work that includes posting movie news. Nevertheless, as has become obvious throughout previous seasons (or indeed, most HBO shows for that matter), death still ever lurks around the corner for the characters we've come to appreciate. So we better enjoy seeing these folks interact with each other on screen for a final season, while we still can. For even if they do survive all the way up to the end, we won't be seeing them again anyhow.




http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156408/nieuwe_fotos_ridley_scotts_exodus

There's no denying Sir Ridley Scott is the closest thing we have today to the Cecil B. DeMilles and David Leans of yesteryear. While most of his contemporary colleagues opt to film against mostly blue-screen backdrops on this type of epic film, Scott prefers to deal with the real thing as much as the budget allows. And thanks to his long list of past successes, his budgets tend to be fairly large. Hence his opportunity to shoot scenes on sets like the one above, which can best be described as 'lavish'. Which is not to say Scott has difficulty employing the use of digital trickery when tangible means fall short. There's still a Red Sea to part the blue way (or green, it's all the same). The appeal of lush visual effects, spectacular set construction and grandiose costume design aside, will this new retelling of the familiar Exodus story offer anything of novelty? Maybe Scott took a note from Darren Aronofsky's Noah, which told the Biblical tale in a more streamlined form (also to accommodate viewers of other persuasions, it cannot be denied). However, Scott is a much more straightforward director with a tendency to prefer the classical approach of storytelling. I very much doubt his take on Exodus will deviate much from previous incarnations, surely not as much as Noah dared to be different. Which may be for the better, considering the fairly uncomfortable, haphazard results that spawned (also thanks to studio interference).



http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156405/singer_onthult_details_opening_x-men_apocalypse

And there's more ancient Egypt to go around in Hollywood these days. Which will not surprise audiences who knew better than to walk away before the end credits of X-Men: Days of Future Past had rolled completely. As Bryan Singer's tease of the treatment shows here, X-Men: Apocalypse will open more or less on the same note its predecessor left us, namely the backstory of the age old mutant En Sabah Nur, who will grow over the centuries to become the new X-nemesis Apocalypse. Spectators familiar with the comics won't be surprised by this particular bit of background story for the mutant megalomaniac, as it is integral to the formation of this big Marvel baddie and his 'not all mutants were created equal' philosophy. The scene also serves to flesh out his prime henchmen, the Four Horsemen, which may be of major importance to the various X-Men we're familiar with, as some of them will undoubtedly be chosen to represent Apocalypse - whether they want to or not - in the movie's present day and age. Or is Singer going to be very brave and ignore the events of Days of Future Past by diving directly in the alternate reality popularly known as the Age of Apocalypse? I would applaud that decision, but I'm sure it won't come that far, as the studio will be convinced it will needlessly confuse the general audience, which might have some difficulty accepting the notion of alternate universes which in the comics has become a routine ingredient of the X-franchise. It would also detract from the cinematic universe studio Fox is currently hoping to built (though Days of Future Past showed disappointingly little evidence of that, hinting at the studio's insecurity as to how to proceed on that front) if things were to be mixed up too much at this point. Lastly, Days of Future Past's overly cheerful ending, where a dark finale heralding the rise of Apocalypse seemed to have made so much more sense than the happy-happy joy-joy climax we were served instead, goes to show Singer too isn't so brave as to stir things up that aggressively. I don't expect to be surprised by X-Men: Apocalypse too much from a narrative perspective, as I'm not at all surprised by the hints dropped through this Instagram tease.

donderdag 5 december 2013

Today's Mini-Review: The Counselor





The Counselor: ***/*****, or 6/10

According to Cormac McCarthy, acclaimed author of novels such as No Country for Old Men and The Road (and thus indirectly also responsible for two great cinematic adaptations of said works), hell hath no fury like a woman hungry. In his screenwriting debut, The Counselor, we learn a thing or two about women for sure. They can be the most scheming, conniving, ruthlessly intelligent and sexually uninhibited creatures imaginable, or they can be loving, charming wives-to-be instead, though the former eats the latter for lunch if left to her shady devices. McCarthy also means to inform his audience on a diverse range of other assorted topics with this film, including the make-up of diamonds, the dangers of speeding (which can lead to both incarceration and decapitation), the sexually stimulating nature of fast cars and the machinations of a deadly device called a bolito (which we will end up seeing in working order in much more detail than we would like to have seen before the film is over) but the exact workings of the film's main topic, a drug deal gone horribly awry, remain rather elusive by comparison. McCarthy proves he's as consistent in his job as a screen writer as he is a novelist, as he keeps dabbling in the cynical realm associated with man's darker, greedier nature, but coherency unfortunately is not his strong suit as evidenced here.

The Counselor features all the ingredients of a strong, effective film, including an intriguing premise, a top-notch director in the person of Sir Ridley Scott and a solid cast to match. The counselor in question is an otherwise nameless man (Michael Fassbender) who leads a seemingly happy life with his fiancé Laura (Penelope Cruz), but aspires to gain much more by better playing his card of being in a position of influence, which leads him to the decision of getting involved in a lucrative but risky drug deal. His associates, the flamboyant bon-vivant Reiner (Javier Bardem) and the cautionary Westray (Brad Pitt) tell him of the dangers of such deals in juicy details (most of which we will see come to bloody fruition in a grand case of cinematic parallelism), but the counselor accepts the job nonetheless. You know this charming man is gonna regret his choice well before he actually makes it, but you'll find him sympathetic enough to root for him to be successful in this venture. When the trafficker loses his head, someone at the top of the game loses a lot of money, patience and general goodwill towards man, which leads to everybody's necessity to bail out immediately or face grave, disturbing consequences. Reiner's girlfriend Malkina (Cameron Diaz), a woman as gorgeous as she is devious and greedy above all else, soon seems to be pulling all the strings and relentlessly hunts the money and those in her way. A killing spree erupts, in which a fair share of people, decent and not so decent alike, lose it all, during which the counselor must come to terms with the very bad call he made, one we always knew from the get-go would come to this conclusion. This film sounds very much like a thriller, which it wants to be, but the amount of thrills it offers comes up short. In fact, the first half of the movie is comprised of endless dialogue, some beautifully written, some less catchy, but much of it quite digressing and ultimately redundant. When the shit finally hits the fan, it does so with a vengeance in a bunch of short, brutal bursts, but by that time many spectators will have seized to care, or worse, failed to understand just what is going on and who is connected to who in the ultimate scheme of things considering the many players and their complicated and underdeveloped interrelations.


Nevertheless, what The Counselor lacks in terms of writing, Sir Ridley often makes up for to some extent in directing, as the film's best moments are largely cinematic in nature, including the drug dealer accidentally shot in the head and immediately robbed by local vagabonds before being devoured by his own cheetahs, as well as the already infamous scene displaying Malkina's inexplicable drive to copulate with a nice car (Cameron certainly goes for it!), an ecstatic moment of absurdity that ruins the ride for its bewildered owner. The Counselor has all the hallmarks of a flawed masterpiece, as everything is necessary to craft a grand, suspenseful film, but none of it is arranged in the correct order and the dominant overall tone of cynicism, McCarthy's overarching theme, makes it hard to behold as it schemes its way towards an unsettling climax.

dinsdag 3 september 2013

Today's Mini-Review: Black Hawk Down



Black Hawk Down

Rating: ****/*****, or 7/10

Ridley Scott's account of the U.S. Marine incident in Somalia of October 3, 1993. Scott provides the drama, producer Jerry Bruckheimer ensures the expected carnage and explosions (plus a bunch of actual Black Hawk helicopters!). A wonderfully diverse cast of both top actors (Tom Sizemore, Ewan McGregor, Sam Shepard) and former unknowns (among them, Eric Bana, William Fichtner, Tom Hardy, Nicolaj Coster-Waldau and Orlando Bloom) portrays the various Army Rangers and their commanding officers, who set out to perform a mission that soon spins out of everybody's control, resulting in a spectacular but horrific onslaught. Dispatched to arrest several high ranking officers of a vicious local warlord in Mogadishu, their objective swiftly turns into a basic fight to get out alive as the soldiers find themselves severely outnumbered when confronted with thousands of angry Somalis. All hell breaks loose on the city streets as a humongous firefight ensues that will witness several Americans gutted publicly and not one but two Black Hawk helicopters taken out. Not to mention the hundreds upon hundreds of Somali footsoldiers that got themselves killed in their attempt to simply overrun their highly trained opponents instead of going about their business with any tactical sense. Starting things at a surprisingly slow pace, an eerie calm before the storm you know will follow, Scott introduces the platoon of sympathetic young soldiers at his leisure, portraying them as fairly naive and rather bored by the lack of action, clearly not entirely grasping the gravity of the tense political situation they're in. But then, how could they predict things would get this bad, considering it wasn't supposed to go down the way it ended up doing? The moment they go in, there's no more time for levity and laughs since what follows is two hours of non-stop action where these boys have to deal with everything their military education had hoped them to avoid. Scott proves completely uncompromising, revealing the absolute brutality of the events in all its graphic horror, resulting in a harrowing viewing experience that's clearly not suited for everybody: if you're uncomfortable at the sight of bloody operations without sedatives or any type of gory dismemberment, you had better stay away from this film. As sudden as it started the fight is over and we're simply left numb and combat fatigued, wondering how things could have gotten so terribly out of hand so fast (even though the mission wasn't actually a failure by definition, as its goal was secured!). Despite its powerful punch, the movie tends to feel monotonous after 80 minutes of relentless gunfire, while it's a shame the Somali point of view is only briefly adressed (since 90% of the Somalis in this film end up as cannon fodder, it would have been nice to know what they thought they were fighting for). Nevertheless, Sir Ridley has clearly proven he's just as adapt at making daring, gripping war movies as he is at historical epics and science fiction pictures. Though there's little doubt audiences will prove as adapt at sitting through this cinematic battle from hell without any sense of shock and horror.

Starring: Eric Bana, Ewan McGregor, Josh Hartnett

Directed by Ridley Scott

USA/UK: Revolution Studios, 2001


donderdag 29 augustus 2013

Today's News: an Exodus of Thor posters
























Here's a double bill for ya:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/149631/nieuwe_posters_thor_the_dark_world

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/149632/nieuwe_cast_voor_ridley_scotts_exodus

A pair of grand new posters, befitting the characters in question me thinks. Thor looks mighty and divine as a thunder god ought to, while Loki appears sinister and villainous as always. There's some subtle clues in the Loki poster concerning the fate of Asgard at the hands of the legion of the Dark World of Svartalfheim, possibly - and likely - with Loki's aid. There's little more to be said about these new one-sheets other than that they continue to foster hopes Thor: The Dark World will be an epic Marvel flick successfully succeeding its predecessor in terms of cosmic scope and marvelous mysticism.

And speaking of epic - as subtle a segue as you're ever gonna get from me - there's Sir Ridley Scott's latest project which appears to be just that, but Biblical. It appears Exodus is his serious take on the Old Testament book of the same name, without going for a more cynical tone, as was at first the idea with his Robin Hood (which unfortunately didn't work out though, and it ended up a typical period film devoid of surprises accordingly). So far its increasingly impressive cast seems up to the task, though I do disagree with the casting choice for Christian Bale as Mozes; personally I wouldn't follow Bale to the Promised Land, though I concur there are plenty of others that would. I'm more intrigued by the casting of established character actors the likes of Ben Kingsley (also a Sir), John Turturro, Sigourney Weaver and Joel Edgerton (not Sirs). As for Aaron Paul, he seems the odd one out in this bunch. Unless he's supposed to deliver a lighter overall tone to the piece, something I trust Scott won't let get out of hand. That he can play the type of character he did in Breaking Bad is one thing, but now Paul must prove he's up to playing other types of roles as well. Under Scott's supervision, I say we need not fear for anything less than stellar performances of Bale's colleagues throughout. As for Bale himself, well... he's Batman... no more! Ben Affleck is Batman now, deal with it.



woensdag 13 juni 2012

How to make a Xenomorph


Prometheus: ****/*****, or 8/10

A tall, pale humanoid stands at the top of a towering waterfall and nearly ritualistically drinks a black liquid. Within seconds, his body starts to physically come apart in a most gruesome way, his cells literally unraveling and his physique disintegrating as he plunges himself into the roaring chasm and his DNA mixes with the water. And with this eerie opening the tone is set for Prometheus, the eagerly awaited latest science fiction blockbuster from Sir Ridley Scott, who with this film not only returns to his own roots but also to the roots of the much acclaimed and beloved Alien saga. And herein could lie a problem, since explaining some of the mysteries of his own original Alien film (1979) might hurt the franchise as a whole in terms of narrative continuity. The trick, however, is not minding that it hurts, especially given the fact Sir Ridley delivers a whole set of other intriguing questions in the process, building upon which may very well reinvigorate this franchise which until recently seemed milked dry completely.



-Warning! Here be spoilers!- When scientists and lovebirds Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) in the year 2089 make a connection between the depiction of a tall figure pointing at a set of ever identically proportioned dots on cave paintings and murals of various ancient cultures around the globe and a distant star system, the starship Prometheus is dispatched by the Weyland Corporation to investigate the pair's claims that humanity was spawned by a race of alien beings dubbed 'Engineers' which experimented with our DNA and left said dots as a message to come look for them in space. Upon arrival at the barren world of LV-223, a large artificial structure is found containing endless corridors, a decapitated alien corpse and a room containing a giant stone head and hundreds of odd cylinders containing black liquid. It seems the gods the Prometheus was send to find have died, but they left something behind...

So far the plot seems like a mix between Sir Ridley's own original Alien film, about a spaceship crew send to a deserted planet and encountering an age old lifeform, and the often maligned spin-off Alien VS Predator which revolves around the discovery humanity was kick-started by the extra-terrestrial Predators for their own shady purposes. Of course, Sir Ridley does not mean to copy either, his Prometheus just starts on familiar ground in order to have the plot turn in a whole different direction when we're settled in, at which point it quickly gets quite darker than we have known his work to be for the last few decades. Apparently the black liquid destroys lifeforms it comes into contact with by turning it into a different kind of lifeform: humanity was tricked into believing they would find its creators across the gulf of space and only found its apparent doom instead. And so the crew of the Prometheus must fight for their lives or face total destruction of all mankind. Problem is, the crew is divided into various camps all with their own goals, both selfless and selfish, and all with their own take as to just what the hell is going on. Given the somewhat erratic and hard to follow plot, the audience too must figure out for itself just what to make of things, since Sir Ridley has no intention to just hand us the answers on a platter, but wants us to work for them instead.


It has been a while since a decently philosophical blockbuster sci-fi film tormented the audience by conjuring up sometimes nigh unfathomable questions regarding Life, the Universe and Everything, so Sir Ridley's attempt at provoking the audience to use their brains a bit is certainly worthy of praise, but the plot makes it challenging to comprehend Prometheus' intentions. It's quite likely studio involvement is to blame, as is usually the case with Sir Ridley's films, since studio executives often feel his movies are too difficult to understand for general audiences which leads to them being edited to focus less on the deep issues addressed and more on the action. Already a Director's Cut has been announced that will hopefully make for a better structured narrative, but so far we can only speculate as to the Engineers' actual intentions by creating the black liquid and their apparent loss of interest for humanity's wellbeing.

So far, exploring the background of these Engineers, who we originally came to know as the Space Jockey from the first Alien film, does sadly demystify the awesome introduction of this species in Sir Ridley's breakthrough motion picture, by fleshing them out in more detail than we might have liked, and eventually even reducing them to more typical movie monsters as we watch the last of their kind alive go on a murderous rampage to kill the Prometheus' crew, just to be destroyed by its own lethal creation that was meant to be humanity's undoing instead, but not before duking it out with this monstrosity in a 'monster versus monster' battle of standard Hollywood procedure feeling (again, there's a touch of Alien VS Predator here, and not for the better). Which of course leads to the question that is first and foremost on everybody's mind since they learned this movie is more or less a prequel to Alien: just what is the Xenomorph's deal?


It's in regard to this matter that Prometheus remains the most vague, as if Ridley never really wanted to provide any actual answers. Suffice to say, Xenomorphs appear to be a a bio-weapon after all, which they were always hinted to be used for by the evil Company in the Alien films proper. It definitely seems open for debate (an offer I accepted when travelling home with a friend while returning from watching this film; we spend about an hour trying to wrap our brains around it, with plenty of questions still unanswered, mind you), but it seems to me the black liquid is this film's incarnation of the 'Genesis device', creating life on a barren world by mixing it with water (as the alien “Prometheus” did at the opening scene of the film), or replacing already existing life with such life. It's a complicated process for sure, and apparently it never works the same in this film: while a worm coming into contact with the black goo is turned into a Xenomorph like snake, a Prometheus crewmember that gets a full dose in his face simply turns into a prowling, deformed madman turning on his shipmates and viciously killing them, before being shot at, burned and run down by a truck. Of course the main question foremost on the fans' minds will be, 'is the traditional Xenomorph we've come to love in Prometheus?' Having given a nicely red coloured spoiler warning some paragraphs above, I will simply answer this question positively by stating that it is... sort of... The problem for me is not its appearance (which differs from what we've seen before), but its creation. In answer to the question cleverly hidden in this article's title, here's the recipe Prometheus gives for creating a genuine chestbursting Alien (don't try this at home!):

-Slip a small dose of black liquid into an unsuspecting male victim's drink
-Let the male victim have sex with a woman, even though she's sterile
-After successful (unsafe) love making, the woman will find herself pregnant within ten hours
-Soon afterwards, the squid like creature gestating inside her tummy will burst through her chest (unless she manages to remove it by performing an caesarean section on herself)
-The squid will rapidly grow in size from about 1 ft. long to a whopping 10 ft. long overnight
-Have the now full sized creature penetrate an Engineer's mouth with its ovipositor
-After several hours, a small Xenomorph will spring from the Engineer's chest, killing him in the process (as is Xenomorph tradition)

Say what you will about Prometheus' dubious and overly convoluted Xenomorph origins, it makes for some very effective and affective horror, as the above description makes clear. It's safe to say Sir Ridley hasn't added such overtly gory scenes to any of his films since the original Alien in 1979. Where he sticked to an occasional chestbursting scene and limited the gore to suggestive imagery in that movie, he certainly went all out here, resulting in a plethora of scenes featuring the likes of genetically decomposing, arm snapping, involuntary facial penetration, burning and general dismemberment, not to mention a certain explicit self-operation scene that had even me gasping for breath while firmly grasping my seat. To think the studio ever considered this movie susceptible for a PG-13 rating seems completely unrealistic, since Prometheus is largely the stuff only a hard R rating can do justice. It's good to know Sir Ridley still knows how to shock his audience convincingly, like he did with Alien at the start of his career.


Something else this accomplished director succeeds in perfectly is eliciting excellent performances from his cast. In fact, Rapace and Marshall-Green, though they do an adequate job for sure, are outclassed at every turn by their colleagues, with Michael Fassbender delivering the film's standout performance in the role of the android (wouldn't be an Alien film without one, eh?) David, balancing carefully and compellingly between the psychotic and the angelic, between a child asking his parents how and why he came to be and a slave eager to turn on his oppressors at the first opportunity, so you never know what his agenda is and whose side he's one (if anybody's). The film successfully draws parallells between his human masters searching for their supposed creators and David living amidst his own creators who he obviously finds flawed, in several all too short scenes of which we can only hope there's more where those came from on the expected Director's Cut. At the other end of the spectrum there's Charlize Theron in the role of Meredith Vickers, the mission leader whose apparent job it is to make sure the Weyland Corporation gets its money worth out of this excessively expensive space trip, though her plight is far more personal considering she's the actual daughter of Mr. Weyland himself, who preferred David's company over hers, since the android is the closest thing he ever had to a son. Theron plays the role on fire, shrewdly maneuvering between appearing as a coldhearted rich bitch simply out to make money and a wronged daughter aiming for revenge. And then there's the old man himself, being played by Guy Pearce in heavy make-up. Weyland was a secret passenger, like Prometheus was on a secret mission to make contact with the Engineers and ask them for the secret to immortality so the dying old man could yet be saved.

As the movie makes perfectly clear, human immortality is actually far from the Engineers' minds, which results in some solid action scenes, both those involving the Engineers and Xenomorphs as well as those without. Also laudable is the quality of the visual effects, which help remind the audience of the original Alien atmosphere in both human and extra-terrestrial sense, but also being uniquely Prometheus material instead of simply rehashing what was done before. In fact, this sums up the whole of the film, since as a supposed Alien prequel, it certainly stands on its own merits, only hinting at the events in that earlier film without giving the exact explanations as to what happened prior to the events in Alien, so there's still some mystery to enjoy in that regard. It does at time contradict the later entries into the franchise though: the role of the badass Alien Queen which drove much of the later Alien films' plots now seems under serious scrutiny. But considering Sir Ridley's involvement with the franchise ended then right after the first film, it's understandable he favours his own appraoch here above building on the work of others who took over his job in the past.

Overall, Ridley Scott proves he can still distill a good movie out of the dried up franchise he created, the result being both spectacular and thought provoking, but frustratingly feeling incomplete, something he has even gone so far as to admit it simply is. Prometheus is a thinking man's Sci-Fi horror rollercoaster, a rare thing to behold in the post-Avatar days where science fiction feels dumbed down a bit due to the focus on visual and 3-D effects and the lack of exploring philosophical themes as the genre used to do more often. Given the large number of new unsolved questions, a sequel feels both likely and desireable. Sir Ridley could leave it in the hands of a capable young director like he did last time (it was James Cameron then, it shouldn't be now), or he can save everyone three decades and just do it himself, instead of having to do some damage control in another 33 years time. Either way, the Pandora's Box opened by Prometheus certainly won't be closed just yet.

And watch the trailer here:

woensdag 1 februari 2012

Alien




Rating ****/*****, or 9/10

Disturbing and claustrophobic space horror. The crew of the commerical towing space vessel Nostromo is sent to answer a distress call originating from a barren world, where they find a derelict extra-terrestrial vessel inhabited by a lone alien corpse long dead that ought to be a warning of the terrors to come. One of their party is subdued and impregnated by an alien parasite, after which a monstrous creature hatches from his chest in a graphic bloody manner and starts picking off the crew one by one. To make matters worse, there's a corporate agent in their midst who has been ordered to keep the alien alive and take it back to Earth for scientific study. Ridley Scott's breakthrough science fiction chiller is as powerfully scary today as it was over three decades ago. Also the movie that launched Sigourney Weaver to stardom thanks to her performance as the 'last man standing', except she's a woman, which at this time was still mostly unheard of in this type of film. The bizarre Alien creature (dubbed a 'xenomorph' in following sequels), a courtesy of master of grotesqueries H.R.Giger, still rules on an unsurpassed design level all its own, as do the evocative, sexually charged environments of the derelict and the iconic dead Space Jockey, as well as the realistic, claustrophobic 'used future' corridors of the Nostromo vessel.


Starring: Tom Skerritt, Sigourney Weaver, Ian Holm

Directed by Ridley Scott

USA: 20th Century Fox, 1979