Posts tonen met het label Michael Fassbender. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Michael Fassbender. Alle posts tonen

woensdag 1 juni 2016

Today's Review: X-Men: Apocalypse



Still behind on all the stuff I wrote, but slowly gaining.

X-Men: Apocalypse - Recensie

'Third one is always the worst' says Jean Grey when leaving the theater after watching Return of the Jedi back in '83. She was right about that one, and conscious or unconscious (I doubt the writer intended for this movie to be the weakest in the second X-trilogy), she's also correct about X-Men: Apocalypse. However, also like Return of the Jedi, Apocalypse still is a whole lot of mutant fun for those who didn't expect the franchise to reach new heights anyway.

Granted, it's not the story that provides the mirth, since it's the stuff of repetition, variations on themes and lack of narrative evolution. Basically, another all-powerful mutant rears his head and threatens to destroy the world for mankind so that its stronger successors can take over. And once again, the X-Men, fighting for peace between man and mutant, must get together to stop this megalomaniacal scheme from becoming reality. This time, it's not Magneto who has hatched the diabolical plan, but rather a 5,000 year old ideological predecessor, an ancient Egyptian once worshiped as a god, with the modern moniker Apocalypse. Magneto, once more masterfully performed by Michael Fassbender, merely provides some muscle to help Oscar Isaac's semi-god with his evil shenanigans. Isaac does a decent job playing an age old villain, but he's no Fassbender and his Apocalypse is nowhere near as intimidating or intriguing as the much more relatable Magneto.


Still, the villain suffices for the cause of bringing together two generations of X-Men, the First Class lot and the new batch of young recruits, including novel takes on classic X-characters Cyclops, Jean Grey and Nightcrawler. Their performances and their chemistry make us hopeful for the future of the franchise, should the studio feel like using them for the next installment Apocalypse seems to be building up to. For although it's meant as a conclusion to a trilogy, the ground work is amply laid for more to come and these young stars succeed in making us curious about what lies ahead. The new additions to the cast are aided by snappy dialogue and light humour, making the shortcomings in the plot not nearly as blatant as they would have been in lesser hands. Nevertheless, it's clear director Bryan Singer, who has made his fourth X-movie with this title, has run out of ideas for the X-universe. Though we appreciate his work on both trilogies, new blood would be equally welcome in the creative room as it proved in the cast.


woensdag 30 april 2014

Today's Double News: X-creed



Two bits of movie news I wrote for MS:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/155455/justin_kurzel_gaat_assassins_creed_verfilmen

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/155407/fox_overweegt_x-men_tv-serie

An X-Men TV-show, why the heck not? In fact, why not try this years ago? There's so many characters, locales, powers and motives in the many decades of X-comics, the movies have barely even scratched the surface. Plus, the film franchise insists on a small ensemble of characters as the core team, while most other mutants presented are relegated to bit parts instead. A TV-show would be able to flesh such underused characters out neatly, while also keeping the franchise from becoming overly convoluted to the general audience, as the film series tends to risk just that in the next few years due to Fox's insistence on copying Marvel proper via excessive crossovering. That said, I agree with Kinberg that a show revolving around superpowered individuals is in danger of breaching budget limitations which always plague the realm of television. But these powers don't have to be so in-your-face as seen in the source material. It's not the first superhuman TV-series after all. Just consider the likes of The 4400, Heroes and Alphas, who in many ways incorporated everything X-Men would have to do, except they were lacking the big X-Men name to draw audiences in initially. Granted, FX on these shows weren't always convincing (Heroes far from it in fact), but the technology keeps pushing the limits and grandiose effects are getting ever more affordable. Of course, at its heart, X-Men isn't at all about the superpowers and the cool visuals, it's about the characters and the social commentary. We are living in the golden age of television, where such ingredients are almost a given, so that also need not be an issue. However, as with Marvel's current series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., audience expectations in terms of characters might be an obstacle to overcome. These days, thanks to the X-movies, the term 'X-Men' will immediately bring to mind associations with a very select group of characters, including but not necessarily limited to Wolverine, Professor Xavier, Magneto and Mystique. Considering the high profile actors, if not outright Hollywood stars, playing these parts, it's not likely these hugely popular characters will make an appearance, unless recasting is in order (which won't sit well with many fans no doubt). To me, Xavier is the only true must-have, as he's the guy responsible for all the X-ing about. Other than that, there's plenty of personas, protagonists and antagonists alike, to pick from. You just need to convince the audience quickly of the quality of the show and the characters involved before they start to miss those X-characters they've come to love. Of course, if the TV-show is running alongside the movies, things are different, and probably only more difficult to pull off in terms of making the show stand on its own instead of being a mere appendix of the movies. As you can see, there's many elements to take into consideration in creating this show, which is undoubtedly why Fox hasn't greenlighted anything yet. I think it's harder to make a TV-show based off a film series work than the other way around. But then, if Fox had started the franchise on television instead of on the big screen in 2000, it's unlikely the superhero movie (especially those carrying the Marvel brand) would have been as popular as it is today.




As for Magneto, I highly doubt we'll see either Sir Ian McKellen or Michael Fassbender in that role on telly. We will be seeing Fassbender in other capacities though, most notably as the popular titular assassin from Assassin's Creed, in the upcoming big budget movie adaptation of the video game. The project will reunite him with director Justin Kurzel, with whom he recently worked on an adaptation of that Scottish play, MacBeth. Considering Fassbender is also producing Assassin's Creed, he'll probably have had a hand in hiring his director. Such loyalty is a good sign the relationship between star and director is strong and effective and will likely spawn positive results for Assassin's Creed. Good thing too, as expectations for this video game movie are no doubt high considering its success on the game market and its recognizable name. Even though the "curse" on video game adaptations has softened somewhat over recent years, it sure as hell hasn't been lifted wholly, and any movie based on a game is still met with quite a lot of initial scepticism accordingly. At least the movie will star a solid actor we know can play any part including this one easily.


donderdag 5 december 2013

Today's Mini-Review: The Counselor





The Counselor: ***/*****, or 6/10

According to Cormac McCarthy, acclaimed author of novels such as No Country for Old Men and The Road (and thus indirectly also responsible for two great cinematic adaptations of said works), hell hath no fury like a woman hungry. In his screenwriting debut, The Counselor, we learn a thing or two about women for sure. They can be the most scheming, conniving, ruthlessly intelligent and sexually uninhibited creatures imaginable, or they can be loving, charming wives-to-be instead, though the former eats the latter for lunch if left to her shady devices. McCarthy also means to inform his audience on a diverse range of other assorted topics with this film, including the make-up of diamonds, the dangers of speeding (which can lead to both incarceration and decapitation), the sexually stimulating nature of fast cars and the machinations of a deadly device called a bolito (which we will end up seeing in working order in much more detail than we would like to have seen before the film is over) but the exact workings of the film's main topic, a drug deal gone horribly awry, remain rather elusive by comparison. McCarthy proves he's as consistent in his job as a screen writer as he is a novelist, as he keeps dabbling in the cynical realm associated with man's darker, greedier nature, but coherency unfortunately is not his strong suit as evidenced here.

The Counselor features all the ingredients of a strong, effective film, including an intriguing premise, a top-notch director in the person of Sir Ridley Scott and a solid cast to match. The counselor in question is an otherwise nameless man (Michael Fassbender) who leads a seemingly happy life with his fiancé Laura (Penelope Cruz), but aspires to gain much more by better playing his card of being in a position of influence, which leads him to the decision of getting involved in a lucrative but risky drug deal. His associates, the flamboyant bon-vivant Reiner (Javier Bardem) and the cautionary Westray (Brad Pitt) tell him of the dangers of such deals in juicy details (most of which we will see come to bloody fruition in a grand case of cinematic parallelism), but the counselor accepts the job nonetheless. You know this charming man is gonna regret his choice well before he actually makes it, but you'll find him sympathetic enough to root for him to be successful in this venture. When the trafficker loses his head, someone at the top of the game loses a lot of money, patience and general goodwill towards man, which leads to everybody's necessity to bail out immediately or face grave, disturbing consequences. Reiner's girlfriend Malkina (Cameron Diaz), a woman as gorgeous as she is devious and greedy above all else, soon seems to be pulling all the strings and relentlessly hunts the money and those in her way. A killing spree erupts, in which a fair share of people, decent and not so decent alike, lose it all, during which the counselor must come to terms with the very bad call he made, one we always knew from the get-go would come to this conclusion. This film sounds very much like a thriller, which it wants to be, but the amount of thrills it offers comes up short. In fact, the first half of the movie is comprised of endless dialogue, some beautifully written, some less catchy, but much of it quite digressing and ultimately redundant. When the shit finally hits the fan, it does so with a vengeance in a bunch of short, brutal bursts, but by that time many spectators will have seized to care, or worse, failed to understand just what is going on and who is connected to who in the ultimate scheme of things considering the many players and their complicated and underdeveloped interrelations.


Nevertheless, what The Counselor lacks in terms of writing, Sir Ridley often makes up for to some extent in directing, as the film's best moments are largely cinematic in nature, including the drug dealer accidentally shot in the head and immediately robbed by local vagabonds before being devoured by his own cheetahs, as well as the already infamous scene displaying Malkina's inexplicable drive to copulate with a nice car (Cameron certainly goes for it!), an ecstatic moment of absurdity that ruins the ride for its bewildered owner. The Counselor has all the hallmarks of a flawed masterpiece, as everything is necessary to craft a grand, suspenseful film, but none of it is arranged in the correct order and the dominant overall tone of cynicism, McCarthy's overarching theme, makes it hard to behold as it schemes its way towards an unsettling climax.

woensdag 27 november 2013

Today's News: the Days of Future Past go viral in the Sixties



Business is slow of late, but don't blame me, blame business. And blame time for not being available in the quantities one would like to have at his/her disposal. Anyway, here's a bit of news I managed to slip through:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/151963/viral_video_x-men_days_of_future_past_online

I like alternative timelines, I like viral campaigns for movies that make good use of them to get me excited for a movie and I like X-Men, so this is a winner. It may not be the most detailed video (and a bit short really) and it's more of a teaser for the Bent Bullet website (which it itself is a teaser for next year's X-Men: Days of Future Past movie), but it serves as a decent catalyst for public interest. The article on the website looks fascinating too, but unfortunately, as mentioned above, lack of time prohibits me from reading it (probably until the Holidays have come and gone). I glanced through it and already found a minor spoiler for characters that we saw join Magneto's cause in X-Men: First Class, but won't be featured in the sequel because life (or its exact opposite rather) intervened with their goals. So no Jason Flemyng in DoFP apparently, since he's apparently too busy getting cast for Star Wars Episode VII.

You gotta love the eternal 'what if' question. Marvel certainly does, the House of Ideas even made a long running, delightful comic book series entitled What If on the subject, dealing exclusively with alternative plots to regular series, to explore the possibilities had things turned out otherwise. What if Wolverine was a Thirties' gangster? What if Spider-Man's daughter had survived? This viral video really fits right into that same venue. After all, First Class already handled historic happenstances that we know the conclusion of (at least, students of history do), but shed a different light on the situation because of the superpowered individuals native to the X-Universe, who could have influenced such global events for intriguing dramatic purposes. Occurrences that are shrouded into mystery until this day beg a mutant involvement in fiction, so the JFK assassination is a logical topic for an alternate history revisitation. Magneto bending a bullet so it would hit Kennedy is a wonderful notion, as is the thought of Mystique disguising herself as somebody else (in this instance, Lee Harvey Oswald) and taking the shot itself to add to the public confusion and number of question marks surrounding the case. Upon learning the possibility of mutant influence in the matter, the bleak future we'll see in the next movie, where mutants are hunted and slaughtered by the robotic Sentinels to guard the human public, is not such an unlikely thing to happen. I sure hope the viral campaign for Days of Future Past will contain more similarly themed conspiracy virals. I have heard it from reliable sources that such mutant scum was also responsible for the Watergate scandal and the Chernobyl catastrophe, ya know...




donderdag 5 juli 2012

David Cronenberg's new frame of mind


Yesterday I worked my first shift as a volunteer running the film projector at the local arthouse theater Provadja, something I will now do each Wednesday evening. I had an easy start, playing only one film, whereas for the next two months it will be three a night. The film in question was David Cronenberg's second to most recent film, A Dangerous Method, a movie I had wanted to see in regular theaters upon its initial release in March, but I never got around to do so. That's the good thing about this new job, I get another chance to see arthouse, or generally good quality, films I missed the first time (I don't think I'll get another shot at Piranha 3DD though, which has now left movie theaters much to my chagrin), since Provadja gets a lot of these as their weekly movie a few months down the road. Projecting the film was a real piece of cake, thanks to the advantages of digital projection (that same progress got me kicked out of the operator's booth at Pathé though, so it's not all fun and laughs), and I had a fair sized audience of no less than fourteen people (the room the movie played at can hold about 45). If you're lucky, you can watch the whole film from the projector's booth, but sadly, I needed to occasionally focus on other chores, so I missed about 15 minutes, which included a few important scenes here and there. Having missed those, I can't honestly write a full review of this film (that would be a rather dangerous method for any critic), so I'll have to make due with some more general observations: after all, despite not having seen it in its entirety, I still have an opinion on the bits I did get to see, which lead me to believe that A Dangerous Method would be rated by me as about ****/*****, 7or 8 out of 10.



It's fascinating to see how much David Cronenberg has shifted towards other genres. He's still best known as the director of usually extremely graphic horror films, the foremost expert on 'bodily horror', i.e. playing with, deforming or metamorphizing the human body to often shocking effects, having created various grotesque body transformations in films such as The Fly (1986) – Jeff Goldblum's DNA mixed with that of a fly, thus making him devolve into a bizarre human/insect hybrid – or the even more disconcerting Videodrome (1983) – James Woods equipped with a huge orifice, quite explicitly resembling a female's naughty bits, in his abdomen so he can insert and “play” videotapes in his body – which for a long time was really Cronenberg's signature: if you saw the shit he pulled, you immediately realized beyond doubt you were watching a Cronenberg flick! However, in recent years he mellowed quite a bit, increasingly shying away from such gory effects. Though in his suspense thriller A History of Violence (2005) he still applied a few brief moments of universal disgust (hence the 'violence'), it otherwise hardly felt like a Cronenberg film. Eastern Promises (2007), a film in the same genre, even less so. With A Dangerous Method, a film containing virtually no gore at all, Cronenberg seems to have definitively broken with his status as a director once considered an auteur of horror. In fact, the body no longer seems to interest him, as he sets his sights completely on the human mind this time: though not exactly new to this subject matter – for example, Spider (2002) – compared to the wonders of the body it's still largely terra incognita for him. And what better place to start than with the founding fathers of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung?

In examining these two noted historical characters, Cronenberg not only treads on different subject matter, but also explores a genre he has not worked in before, the period drama piece. This is his first motion picture set in past times, but you would hardly notice his inexperience since he proves all too capable of compellingly and accurately portraying the pre-WW I era of Vienna and ZĂĽrich, including excellent costume work and the occasional temporal signifiers as beautiful early cars and horse carriages. Of course, it's not all that impressive, since A Dangerous Method is hardly a full-on historical epic and focuses on characters much more than on their settings, but it's a good sign Cronenberg has no trouble expanding his existing oeuvre to include genres he's as yet unaccustomed to. A good start, and hopefully he won't be afraid to turn his scope on the past more often, now that we know he can pull it off seemingly without effort.


As mentioned above though, it's the characters that drive A Dangerous Method, and as such it's the actors portraying them making or breaking the piece. Cronenberg has often proved to get stellar performances out of the top actors in their field, and continues this trend here, reuniting with his present day muse Viggo Mortensen (their third collaboration in a row), as well as Vincent Cassel (second time working together), while adding Michael Fassbender and Keira Knightley to his already outstanding resumé of phenomenal actors he has directed. The latter pair has the hardest job in carrying the whole picture, but neither fails in this regard. In the case of Fassbender, who portrays Jung, this was to be expected, considering his status as one of the most sought after and popular actors of today. Knightley surprises much more in her role of his patient Sabina Spielrein, a young woman suffering from hysteria, who soon turns into something more than just another case for the good doctor as the two of them embark on a wild sexual affair. Knightley maneuvers shrewdly from an out of control and insane girl at one moment and a calm and perfectly rational woman the next, being both disturbingly repulsive and sexually intriguing at the same time, and thus an irresistable mark for Jung from a professional point of view, and soon after as a secret mistress. Plus, Knightley seems to have the perfect facial bone structure for this role, as demonstrated by the way in which she alarmingly protrudes her lower jaw in her many fits of rage. Fassbender and Knightley show to have ample chemistry in their roles, initially as doctor and patient, and soon after as lovers on more or less equal footing. Whereas Fassbender plays Jung with the necessary decorum and stoic restraint in the former relationship, he's seen as a more emotional and angry character in the latter, being able to blow off some steam in her company over his guilt ridden marriage with his bland wife Emma (Sarah Gadon), who has an awkward fixation over producing male offspring with him, and his ultimately tumultuous relation with his one time mentor Freud. Together, Spielrein and Jung can be themselves, as they don't need to ignore their sexual fantasies, such as Sabina's desire for spanking due to a childhood trauma. We root for them because of their genuine affections for each other, but certainly in Jung's case (he's a married man with kids after all), abhor them for having taken this inappropriate route.


No matter how good Fassbender and Knightley are on screen together, it's Mortensen who delivers the most impressive performance playing Sigmund Freud. Mortensen, by now fully versed in Cronenberg's routine, proves himself a genuine chameleon yet again, hardly resembling anything we've seen him look like before, older and fatter, smoking a huge cigar in every scene as if it's an actual body part. He portrays Freud as an old man emotionally detached from everyone, including his star student Jung, despite their shared beliefs concerning the benefits of psychoanalysis, while also wholesomely inflexible when the latter tries to convince him not everything can be reduced to subconscious sexual desires. At the same time we see a Freud who desperately means to cling to his acclaimed social status and tries to weed out subversive elements among his circle of (almost exclusively Jewish) associates in fear of all their work being undone by his many enemies in science and politics who are just eager for some controversy to take him out. Apart from the cigar and the talk about sex, Mortensen gives us a whole new Freud, refusing any relation with the usual cliché ridden versions of the character we are so often unfairly treated to. Also noteworthy is the fact Mortensen does not repeat his role from his earlier collaborations with Cronenberg, not taking center stage this time in favour of Fassbender. Undoubtedly the director and his favourite actor realize full well they will work together again many times God willing, and instead of pulling off a Burton/Depp on us, they know they should explore different set-ups if their professional relationship is to continue to prosper, instead of sinking into a dreary routine of overly repeating their previous work.

Aside from the acting and the look of A Dangerous Method, as well as its place in Cronenberg's repertoire, I dare not say anything conclusively about the movie, especially about its overall story, considering I missed several sequences that seemed of great importance plot wise. For instance, at one moment Freud and Jung arrived in New York in good spirits, but when I returned five minutes later they were back home and detesting one another vigorously. I have no idea what went on there, but it was obviously a vital scene. Overall I can say for sure that A Dangerous Method covers an intriguing subject from an equally intriguing director who is not afraid to try and reinvent himself, making the film look gorgeous, and squeezing top performances out of his main cast. However, I did get the feeling the film's plot was fairly predictable (and not just because it's historic subject matter) and delivered in an overly straightforward way, thus not the most exciting stuff imaginable or presented to us in a really gripping, thought provoking manner; but hey, psychoanalysis isn't for everybody. At least the fourteen people in the room all responded in a mildly enthusiastic mood. Given the average age of this audience, I'm sure this would not have been the case if I had projected some of Cronenberg's earlier, more “visually rebellious” (to put it mildly!) work.

And watch the trailer here:


woensdag 13 juni 2012

How to make a Xenomorph


Prometheus: ****/*****, or 8/10

A tall, pale humanoid stands at the top of a towering waterfall and nearly ritualistically drinks a black liquid. Within seconds, his body starts to physically come apart in a most gruesome way, his cells literally unraveling and his physique disintegrating as he plunges himself into the roaring chasm and his DNA mixes with the water. And with this eerie opening the tone is set for Prometheus, the eagerly awaited latest science fiction blockbuster from Sir Ridley Scott, who with this film not only returns to his own roots but also to the roots of the much acclaimed and beloved Alien saga. And herein could lie a problem, since explaining some of the mysteries of his own original Alien film (1979) might hurt the franchise as a whole in terms of narrative continuity. The trick, however, is not minding that it hurts, especially given the fact Sir Ridley delivers a whole set of other intriguing questions in the process, building upon which may very well reinvigorate this franchise which until recently seemed milked dry completely.



-Warning! Here be spoilers!- When scientists and lovebirds Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) in the year 2089 make a connection between the depiction of a tall figure pointing at a set of ever identically proportioned dots on cave paintings and murals of various ancient cultures around the globe and a distant star system, the starship Prometheus is dispatched by the Weyland Corporation to investigate the pair's claims that humanity was spawned by a race of alien beings dubbed 'Engineers' which experimented with our DNA and left said dots as a message to come look for them in space. Upon arrival at the barren world of LV-223, a large artificial structure is found containing endless corridors, a decapitated alien corpse and a room containing a giant stone head and hundreds of odd cylinders containing black liquid. It seems the gods the Prometheus was send to find have died, but they left something behind...

So far the plot seems like a mix between Sir Ridley's own original Alien film, about a spaceship crew send to a deserted planet and encountering an age old lifeform, and the often maligned spin-off Alien VS Predator which revolves around the discovery humanity was kick-started by the extra-terrestrial Predators for their own shady purposes. Of course, Sir Ridley does not mean to copy either, his Prometheus just starts on familiar ground in order to have the plot turn in a whole different direction when we're settled in, at which point it quickly gets quite darker than we have known his work to be for the last few decades. Apparently the black liquid destroys lifeforms it comes into contact with by turning it into a different kind of lifeform: humanity was tricked into believing they would find its creators across the gulf of space and only found its apparent doom instead. And so the crew of the Prometheus must fight for their lives or face total destruction of all mankind. Problem is, the crew is divided into various camps all with their own goals, both selfless and selfish, and all with their own take as to just what the hell is going on. Given the somewhat erratic and hard to follow plot, the audience too must figure out for itself just what to make of things, since Sir Ridley has no intention to just hand us the answers on a platter, but wants us to work for them instead.


It has been a while since a decently philosophical blockbuster sci-fi film tormented the audience by conjuring up sometimes nigh unfathomable questions regarding Life, the Universe and Everything, so Sir Ridley's attempt at provoking the audience to use their brains a bit is certainly worthy of praise, but the plot makes it challenging to comprehend Prometheus' intentions. It's quite likely studio involvement is to blame, as is usually the case with Sir Ridley's films, since studio executives often feel his movies are too difficult to understand for general audiences which leads to them being edited to focus less on the deep issues addressed and more on the action. Already a Director's Cut has been announced that will hopefully make for a better structured narrative, but so far we can only speculate as to the Engineers' actual intentions by creating the black liquid and their apparent loss of interest for humanity's wellbeing.

So far, exploring the background of these Engineers, who we originally came to know as the Space Jockey from the first Alien film, does sadly demystify the awesome introduction of this species in Sir Ridley's breakthrough motion picture, by fleshing them out in more detail than we might have liked, and eventually even reducing them to more typical movie monsters as we watch the last of their kind alive go on a murderous rampage to kill the Prometheus' crew, just to be destroyed by its own lethal creation that was meant to be humanity's undoing instead, but not before duking it out with this monstrosity in a 'monster versus monster' battle of standard Hollywood procedure feeling (again, there's a touch of Alien VS Predator here, and not for the better). Which of course leads to the question that is first and foremost on everybody's mind since they learned this movie is more or less a prequel to Alien: just what is the Xenomorph's deal?


It's in regard to this matter that Prometheus remains the most vague, as if Ridley never really wanted to provide any actual answers. Suffice to say, Xenomorphs appear to be a a bio-weapon after all, which they were always hinted to be used for by the evil Company in the Alien films proper. It definitely seems open for debate (an offer I accepted when travelling home with a friend while returning from watching this film; we spend about an hour trying to wrap our brains around it, with plenty of questions still unanswered, mind you), but it seems to me the black liquid is this film's incarnation of the 'Genesis device', creating life on a barren world by mixing it with water (as the alien “Prometheus” did at the opening scene of the film), or replacing already existing life with such life. It's a complicated process for sure, and apparently it never works the same in this film: while a worm coming into contact with the black goo is turned into a Xenomorph like snake, a Prometheus crewmember that gets a full dose in his face simply turns into a prowling, deformed madman turning on his shipmates and viciously killing them, before being shot at, burned and run down by a truck. Of course the main question foremost on the fans' minds will be, 'is the traditional Xenomorph we've come to love in Prometheus?' Having given a nicely red coloured spoiler warning some paragraphs above, I will simply answer this question positively by stating that it is... sort of... The problem for me is not its appearance (which differs from what we've seen before), but its creation. In answer to the question cleverly hidden in this article's title, here's the recipe Prometheus gives for creating a genuine chestbursting Alien (don't try this at home!):

-Slip a small dose of black liquid into an unsuspecting male victim's drink
-Let the male victim have sex with a woman, even though she's sterile
-After successful (unsafe) love making, the woman will find herself pregnant within ten hours
-Soon afterwards, the squid like creature gestating inside her tummy will burst through her chest (unless she manages to remove it by performing an caesarean section on herself)
-The squid will rapidly grow in size from about 1 ft. long to a whopping 10 ft. long overnight
-Have the now full sized creature penetrate an Engineer's mouth with its ovipositor
-After several hours, a small Xenomorph will spring from the Engineer's chest, killing him in the process (as is Xenomorph tradition)

Say what you will about Prometheus' dubious and overly convoluted Xenomorph origins, it makes for some very effective and affective horror, as the above description makes clear. It's safe to say Sir Ridley hasn't added such overtly gory scenes to any of his films since the original Alien in 1979. Where he sticked to an occasional chestbursting scene and limited the gore to suggestive imagery in that movie, he certainly went all out here, resulting in a plethora of scenes featuring the likes of genetically decomposing, arm snapping, involuntary facial penetration, burning and general dismemberment, not to mention a certain explicit self-operation scene that had even me gasping for breath while firmly grasping my seat. To think the studio ever considered this movie susceptible for a PG-13 rating seems completely unrealistic, since Prometheus is largely the stuff only a hard R rating can do justice. It's good to know Sir Ridley still knows how to shock his audience convincingly, like he did with Alien at the start of his career.


Something else this accomplished director succeeds in perfectly is eliciting excellent performances from his cast. In fact, Rapace and Marshall-Green, though they do an adequate job for sure, are outclassed at every turn by their colleagues, with Michael Fassbender delivering the film's standout performance in the role of the android (wouldn't be an Alien film without one, eh?) David, balancing carefully and compellingly between the psychotic and the angelic, between a child asking his parents how and why he came to be and a slave eager to turn on his oppressors at the first opportunity, so you never know what his agenda is and whose side he's one (if anybody's). The film successfully draws parallells between his human masters searching for their supposed creators and David living amidst his own creators who he obviously finds flawed, in several all too short scenes of which we can only hope there's more where those came from on the expected Director's Cut. At the other end of the spectrum there's Charlize Theron in the role of Meredith Vickers, the mission leader whose apparent job it is to make sure the Weyland Corporation gets its money worth out of this excessively expensive space trip, though her plight is far more personal considering she's the actual daughter of Mr. Weyland himself, who preferred David's company over hers, since the android is the closest thing he ever had to a son. Theron plays the role on fire, shrewdly maneuvering between appearing as a coldhearted rich bitch simply out to make money and a wronged daughter aiming for revenge. And then there's the old man himself, being played by Guy Pearce in heavy make-up. Weyland was a secret passenger, like Prometheus was on a secret mission to make contact with the Engineers and ask them for the secret to immortality so the dying old man could yet be saved.

As the movie makes perfectly clear, human immortality is actually far from the Engineers' minds, which results in some solid action scenes, both those involving the Engineers and Xenomorphs as well as those without. Also laudable is the quality of the visual effects, which help remind the audience of the original Alien atmosphere in both human and extra-terrestrial sense, but also being uniquely Prometheus material instead of simply rehashing what was done before. In fact, this sums up the whole of the film, since as a supposed Alien prequel, it certainly stands on its own merits, only hinting at the events in that earlier film without giving the exact explanations as to what happened prior to the events in Alien, so there's still some mystery to enjoy in that regard. It does at time contradict the later entries into the franchise though: the role of the badass Alien Queen which drove much of the later Alien films' plots now seems under serious scrutiny. But considering Sir Ridley's involvement with the franchise ended then right after the first film, it's understandable he favours his own appraoch here above building on the work of others who took over his job in the past.

Overall, Ridley Scott proves he can still distill a good movie out of the dried up franchise he created, the result being both spectacular and thought provoking, but frustratingly feeling incomplete, something he has even gone so far as to admit it simply is. Prometheus is a thinking man's Sci-Fi horror rollercoaster, a rare thing to behold in the post-Avatar days where science fiction feels dumbed down a bit due to the focus on visual and 3-D effects and the lack of exploring philosophical themes as the genre used to do more often. Given the large number of new unsolved questions, a sequel feels both likely and desireable. Sir Ridley could leave it in the hands of a capable young director like he did last time (it was James Cameron then, it shouldn't be now), or he can save everyone three decades and just do it himself, instead of having to do some damage control in another 33 years time. Either way, the Pandora's Box opened by Prometheus certainly won't be closed just yet.

And watch the trailer here:

maandag 16 april 2012

Centurion




Rating: ***/*****, or 7/10


Enjoyable high adrenaline action film set in Roman times. In the Second Century A.D., a Roman legion sets out on a mission in the unconquered north of Britain but walks into an ambush and gets viciously decimated, after which a ragtag group of survivors of various ranks and ethnic backgrounds led by Quintus Dias (Michael Fassbender, just before his definite breakthrough roles in X-Men: First Class and Shame the year after) must run for their lives behind enemy lines to get back to Hadrian's Wall and safety. Unfortunately for them, they're hunted by an elite team of killer Picts led by the mute but scary assassin Etain (Olga Kurylenko). Will any of them make it out alive? And if they do, could they ever go back to the life of Roman soldiery? Neil Marshall (The Descent, Doomsday) does his thing as an accomplished action director and doesn't bother making anything even resembling a Roman epic, but delivers a simple chase flick set in ancient times instead. What the film lacks in its straightforward story it makes up for decently in action and suspense. Ironically enough, the following year The Eagle was released (very similar plot wise but more serious in tone), which in terms of story was almost a direct sequel, though that particular production had no ties to Centurion.


Starring: Michael Fassbender, Olga Kurylenko, Dominic West


Directed by Neil Marshall


UK: Celador Films, 2010


This awesome animated poster was also attached to the film, setting the tone of the movie more effectively than the regular theatrical poster bothered to do: