Posts tonen met het label muppets. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label muppets. Alle posts tonen

woensdag 15 januari 2014

Today's Double News: Marco Polo Most Wanted



Another instance of me killing two birds with one stone (an act I can only condone in a figurative sense by the way):

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153071/netflix_produceert_marco_polo_serie

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153030/speciale_golden_globe_promo_voor_muppets_most_wanted

More historical series, epic or otherwise, are always welcome, especially if they involve 'political skullduggery, sexual intrige and spectacular battles'. I can't recall Marco Polo having been done before on the small screen, so this might be as good a time as any to start. There's enough hugely fascinating material to be covered, ranging from Polo's long voyages to the East and the clash of cultures between West and East (but also the mutual learning) the explorer personified, to the major political strife in ancient China. At least there's one Game of Thrones veteran to bring his expertise on television like this along, and the participation of the duo of writer/directors Sandberg and Ronning is also most welcome after their wonderful Kon-Tiki movie that already showed they have an affinity with exploration, even though I know they are quite busy working on Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales simultaneously. In all honesty, I'm not acquainted with showrunner John Fusco's body of work, but judging from his resumé - which includes The Forbidden Kingdom and the upcoming Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon II (don't ask) - the Far East is something he enjoys, and if that's true, he might be properly motivated to make this project work to the best of his abilities, as would befit a showrunner. As for Netflix, I have as yet no need for it in my life, since I prefer to watch television of my choice the oldfashioned way, by slowly but surely - with emphasis on the former it must be admitted - working my merry way through huge piles of DVDs and such. So I guess I'll have to do some serious waiting on this show over the next two years, as I'm also not the downloading type. Oh well, that pile will keep me busy for many more months to come anyway.

And should I get bored regardless I can always go see a movie in theaters, like Muppets Most Wanted for example (not the strongest segue, I'll grant you). This new Golden Globe promo spot is pretty hilarious, though it could easily have been done with other movies too, or for other award shows for that matter. Wouldn't be surprised if the Muppets had something up their sleeve for the Oscars too. Until that time, this fun little teaser is enough to whet our appetite for this 'most sensational, inspirational, celebrational, muppetational' sequel. And it also adequately reminds us to avoid any online message boards that are running rampant with trolls, flame wars and assorted silly people, especially the sort that would entice unsuspecting visitors to make money simply sitting at home.



zondag 2 juni 2013

Today's News: Muppet man off to Wonderland



Here's a Muppet newsflash! Well, not really, but it's the next best thing:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/147579/the_muppets_regisseur_voor_alice_in_wonderland_2

One can question the sanity behind opting for an Alice in Wonderland sequel, but considering the first movie did very well a few years back (it's currently the 14th highest grossing film of all time), it's not surprising Disney feels confident it can squeeze a few more bucks out of us, the audience. Even though most people agreed it wasn't a great movie, desite being a Tim Burton flick. Bobin of course isn't a Burton, but at least he managed to make a really good Muppets film. If he can successfully pull off a film filled with the traditional Muppet zaniness, Wonderland shouldn't prove that much different. He'll just have to get used to trading in the puppets for the pixels. From a story perspective, we shouldn't expect too much. Alice in Wonderland by nature has always proved to lack a true story line, instead having the girl parade from one wacky situation to another. Burton and Woolverton did their best to make a coherent plot for the whole which ended in a fairly stereotypical battle between good and evil. It's likely this will be the formula used for the next installment too, though probably with another evil this time around. And possibly with another Alice as well, since Mia Wasikowska's stock has risen considerably since. The question naturally foremost on everybody's mind is whether Johhny Depp will once again be involved. I shouldn't think so. There's only so much you can do with a character like the Mad Hatter and the first film did it all. Re-introducing him would feel repetitive. Not to mention Burton isn't directing (for sure) so that's another deterrent for Depp's presence. It's most likely for the best, considering Depp's weirdo creations get more obnoxious the more often we seen them pulling off their silly stunts. After all, who isn't starting to get tired of Jack Sparrow's shenanigans by now?

In summation, in my mind there's little cause for Into the Looking Glass other than Hollywood making more money, so we should hope for little. In fact, I'm much more interested in The Muppets...Again! After all, their first movie (the reboot, that is) was much more fun than Burton's Alice in Wonderland, plus it at least has the benefit of the original director returning for more. It's time to play the music, it's time to light the lights. There's enough wonder left in the Muppets to make us forget all about Alice.

zondag 26 februari 2012

Phenomenon!

The Muppets: ****/*****

I had this really bad day at work last Friday. Any Friday is bad, but this one was particularly nasty. I planned to see Hugo afterwards, but I really needed something less complex (and shorter) to take my mind of my misery. So in an almost spontaneous burst of 'whateverism' I went to see The Muppets instead. Oh my, am I glad I did... I left the theatre happy and in a positive mood (which according to my colleagues is a rarity these days).

Why turned the experience out to be so uplifting? Because the Muppets are plain simple fun! There's nothing more to them, and nothing less. And this attitude has kept them popular and alive for well over thirty years, despite their notable absence in the last decade. Now that they're back, it's surprising to see how much they've stayed the same, despite the passing of creator Jim Henson and Frank Oz' unwillingness to participate in their latest venture. They're still puppets (and the occasional man in a suit) performed by puppeteers and tireless craftsmen that make them feel fully alive, without the almost obligatory use of CGI which rules Hollywood animation today.


Even in terms of plot nothing much has changed. Bottom line is a variety show needs to be put up and despite the usual setbacks the old team succeeds perfectly. Of course, the necessity for the show is a bit more severe this time, considering the old Muppet studio is being threatened by a deliciously stereotypical greedy oil baron by the name of Tex Richman (played with an abundance of maniacal laughs by Chris Cooper) who plans to tear it all down and drill for oil, while at the same time acquiring the Muppets' name with the intent to exploit it solely for profit, resulting in his creation of the Moopets, a team of 'harsh and cynical Muppets (consisting of minorities and New Jersey type puppets) for a harsh and cynical world'. Of course, you can question the political agenda the film makers had with this villain and his minions, which right wing America – thanks to the Fox channel – certainly has done, outing the Muppets as 'Marxist puppets', but in the end it could have been any type of greedy, sleazy character in his place. How about a wealthy and overly powerful, conservative, Rupert Murdoch type media tycoon next time? The negativity brought by the bad guy is of no consequence, and neither are his sinister goals: it's the cheerful attitude displayed by the good old Muppets that sticks with us for days.

Of course the story has to start with one Muppet, and it's not Kermit this time. Enter Walter, a rather generic Muppet who has grown up with his human brother Gary (a likeable Jason Segel) watching and loving The Muppet Show. (The concept of a Muppet and a human being actually related by blood is a bit uncomfortable and raises intriguing but disturbing questions about Muppet procreation, but we're not supposed to consider this at all, and certainly kids won't. After all, the idea of a pig falling for and even marrying a frog with the full intent to 'raise tadpoles' is equally alienating, but few children would even stop to think about this for more than a few seconds. If adults see this as disgusting, it's their own sense of reading too much into these things that gets the better of them.) Gary has the problem of not being able to choose between maintaining his relationship with Walter, or moving on with his girlfriend Mary (a 'too cute to be true' kind of Amy Adams). Walter is blind for this and only cares about the Muppets, which eventually results in both brothers having to decide where their allegiances lie: are they men or Muppets? This naturally also deslves into the typical 'believe in yourself' and 'follow your heart' type of memes being thrown out all over the place in the second half of the movie, but despite these life lessons being cliché ridden they don't get in the way of the real fun, which is the only thing the movie really strives to be, at which it succeeds wonderfully.

When Walter discovers the old Muppet facilities are in grave danger he seeks out Kermit who, Kermit being Kermit, is immediately willing and able to help. In a string of scenes we see Kermit and Walter getting the old team of our most beloved Muppets together, resulting in a hilarious montage of characters being re-recruited in rapid succession, with the intention of not ruining the pace of the movie. It's clear from such comments the Muppets are as self aware of their being in a movie as ever, which is exactly the way we like them. When the final obstacle, which turns out to be Miss Piggy's obsessive love for Kermit that hasn't made her able to get over her separation with her little green friend, is out of the way, the challenge of putting up a show that brings the Muppets back into the audience's collective conscience is on, resulting in the usual silly sketches and situations, all the while being sabotaged by Richman and his band of nefarious anti-Muppets. But even the bad Muppets eventually take the side of the real Muppets. It would be impossible for anyone not to do so.


Of course the human element has not been forgotten. In fact, on occasion it's awkwardly dominating, especially in the scenes with Gary or Mary singing and dancing with other humans while there's not a Muppet in sight. Fortunately these scenes work well enough to make us care enough about the human actors not to see them as getting in the way of our true heroes, and their respective song and dance numbers are merry enough to make us roll with them. But the film sees its greatest moments of strengths whenever it's just a bunch of Muppets goofing around, preferably mockingly making fun and play of a celebrity in a cameo role, of which there are plenty (the most memorable ones being provided by Jim Parsons, Emily Blunt and Zach Galifianakis).

In their struggle to find network backing, the Muppets come against a cynical network executive who claims the Muppets are 'not relevant anymore' in the modern world. And she's damn right! There's no real point being made by these Muppets (unless you go with the anti-capitalist messages, which the movie doesn't encourage you to do), other than us being provided with uncomplicated merriment. 'Bringing laughter' is the Muppets' grand gift, this movie claims on more than one occasion, and since the film completely entertains both kids and adults alike, it's proven to be right. This is fun in its most basic shape and it never pretends to be more than that. Despite the dreaded move of the Muppet franchise to the Disney corporation (parallels to which can also be attributed to the Richman character), the Muppet phenomenon successfully enters the 21st century by being what it has always been: good spirited entertainment for all. And it's not even in 3-D, because 'the Muppets are as one-dimensional as they've always been' (Waldorf's words, not mine). Thankfully!