vrijdag 31 januari 2014
Today's News: Winter Soldier is still coming
We're not rid of the star spangled Avenger just yet, like it or not:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153459/nieuwe_posters_captain_america_the_winter_soldier
Seems like the second Captain America's promotional campaign is releasing new pics and posters every other day now. Considering its rival at the boxoffice, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (a Sony release despite being a Marvel superhero too) is doing the same, there's a precedent for this. It's basically ensuring people are aware of your movie whether they care to be or not by going all-out releasing new materila in a high frequency: to put it brief, a sort of overkill. Still not particularly popular outside the US of A, Cap could sure use the help of some glorious new posters like these. Too bad his own is rather dull and overly sombre, not a particularly neat piece of visual imagery that sticks to mind. However, Black Widow's fabulously sexy poster, formidably appropriating all of Scarlett Johansson's wonderful physical attributes, certainly makes up for it (not to mention she can act too). That poster is bound to attract some audiences all by itself. Call me a sexist if you much, but please remember I didn't make the poster, I only spread the word about it by posting it online. It reminds us Cap has something Spidey does not have (yet): a superpowered (well, sort of) female sidekick riding along into battle with him, instead of cheering him on from the sidelines like Emma Stone's all too human Gwen Stacy sticks to (so Sony better introduce the Black Cat or Silver Sable into the rebooted Spider-Man franchise soon to keep up!). People who want to see a heroine kick butt as well as any hero, if not more so, will surely get what they want in this film. Nor will the movie feel the need to have its protagonists from both sexes engage in typical romance with each other, as these characters have a strictly professional relationship. So whatever personal demons continue to haunt Steve Rogers in the 21st century, Agent Romanoff will be there to make sure the threat to world peace (but mostly America) is subdued with extreme prejudice. And otherwise there's still their mutual boss to contend with. As if anybody could beat Samuel L. Jackson in whatever regard. Except for impressive feminine looks of course.
And guess what? On the heels of these new posters and set photos, Marvel released yet another new Cap 2 poster. Why do I even bother to keep up... Because that's what I signed up for is why! And in all honesty, that stunning Black Widow is not a poster I would want to have missed. I'll be sure to keep an eye out at work for that one! Hopefully not while covering me other eye with an eye patch and doing Nick Fury imitations. That would be a little too nerdy even for me.
donderdag 30 januari 2014
Jurassic Park Chaos Effect: Ian Malcolm
Year
of release: 1998
Accessories:
-Dino
Mech Armor Claw
-Body
armour
-Tyrannosaurus
hatchling
Description:
this highly unusual Ian Malcolm figure has black hair, as well as
black eyes and eyebrows, but that's where every similarity with
previous Malcolm figures ends. His trademark sunglasses (even though
they weren't used in the Lost World movie) are absent. Instead, he
wears a yellow jumpsuit, covered in various brown straps as well as
patches (on both knees and the right shoulder). He also wears a brown
belt around his waist and sports black gloves on both hands and black
arm bands around both upper arms. His legs are covered in black boot
like garments, which end right at the upper legs instead of under the
knees. On his left lower leg, a black knife is attached to his boot.
His left hand is closed into a fist, so he can only hold stuff with
his right hand. Otherwise he stands in a fairly neutral pose, though
his left arm is also raised upward to a small extent. The brown strap
that runs over the left part of his chest sports a yellow JP Site B
logo patch. Malcolm comes with a separate piece of body armour,
coloured metallic grey, that fits around his torso, offering him
front protection against the ferocious Chaos Effect predators (though
his back remains unprotected).
Malcolm's
offensive action is supplied by his Dino Mech Armor Claw, a huge
metallic grey device that fits over his right arm (and only his right
arm), and is equipped with two long thin claws (both of them painted
light green), ending in small “teeth” which fit together like
jigsaw puzzle pieces, thus capable of fully closing these claws,
preferably around a target. On the back of the Armor Claw a long
green button is found: pushing this makes the claws open, ready to
grab any prey in its path by releasing the button. The claw piece of
this weapon can be used separately from the arm piece, so it doesn't
have to be attached to figures to use it.
This
set is completed by a T-Rex hatchling, not much unlike other Rex
hatchlings, except it has a smoother, less detailed skin surface, as
well as overly big feet. This hatchling stands in a walking posture,
left leg posed forward and right leg back, while its right arm is
raised and his left arm lowered. It sports a two way paint job: the
underside of the figure (lower jaw, throat, belly, arms, most of the
flanks and legs and lower part of the tail) is coloured bright
orange, while its upper body parts (upper jaw, neck, back and upper
part of the tail) sport a dark red colour, which partially runs over
the upper legs and flanks in triangular stripes. It has white teeth
and eyes (no pupils), and carries a black JP Site B logo on its right
upper leg.
Analysis:
this latest Malcolm incarnation has the distinction of being one of
the most unusual human figures ever produced, though not so much by
Chaos Effect standards (since this whole toy line is basically
unusual, making this Malcolm fit right in. In fact, compared to the
Chaos Effect Roland Tembo figure, this Malcolm looks quite
realistic!). His outfit looks very futuristic, and certainly not like
something you'd see him wearing in the movies since it has a much
more 'cartoonish' feel to it (not surprisingly, since a Chaos Effect
cartoon was once on the drawing boards). The paint job is quite
colourful, though not nearly as imaginative as some of the paint
schemes seen on the dinosaur figures of this toy line. The most
interesting part of his gear is his removable body armour, which
isn't an unlikely tool in a dinosaur invested environment. In fact,
it's surprising a tool like this wasn't seen on earlier JP figures
(JPS2 Bola Alan Grant got pretty close, though his armour was not
removable). The armour can be used by various other Kenner figures,
but it obviously fits best around this Malcolm's body, since it was
designed for this figure specifically. This figure is overall pretty
decent if you can swallow the Chaos Effect premise. For those who
can't, this Malcolm is definitely a hideous Jurassic Park figure.
Malcolm's
Dino Mech Armor Claw is an interesting piece of equipment. Capture
claws have been featured before in earlier toy lines, but never as a
separate piece a human figure could hold: they were always missile
like weapons that could be fired at dinosaurs. This is a more close
range type of capture claw, designed to subdue a creature storming
right at you (preferably a smaller animal, since it has little effect
on bigger beasts). Though when attached to the arm piece the claw can
only be used by Malcolm (since it's incompatible with other human
figures as such), it fortunately can also be used separately. Still,
its effect is limited: though the gripping mechanism is surprisingly
strong for such a small claw, the arms themselves are too thin and
the 'teeth' are too blunt to really grab a hold and restrain most
dinosaur figures, even hatchlings. Even on the Rex hatchling that
comes with this set it doesn't really work, since that figure has
much too smooth a skin surface so it slips loose easily. This weapon
could have used better and stronger claws to make it really work (and
this toy line delivered some on its Land S.A.B.R.E. and Trike Dozer
vehicles), but it's a nice concept regardless (and it certainly beats
the lousy capture claw Hasbro designed for the JP III Alan Grant
figure).
The
Rex hatchling is a cute figure and given its smooth skin and huge
feet it's easily recognizable as a Chaos Effect dinosaur, though its
paint job isn't as elaborate as on most other dinosaurs of this toy
line. It's actually a rather decent paint job, though it's a shame
the big claws on its feet aren't painted and the Rex lacks pupils in
its eyes. Given the abundance of orange on this figure, it's not too
dissimilar a paint job to the big Omega T-Rex's paint scheme, adding
some much needed consistency to this toy line. A nice little
hatchling, but nothing too special.
Playability:
decent enough. Malcolm provides the usual range of poseable body
parts (arms, legs and head). His body armour is a fun gadget and can
be used to some extent by other human figures (though it usually
looks out of place on others). The Capture Claw may not be fully
effective, it's a fun weapon to use and thankfully can also be used
separately from the arm piece, adding some playability to it. The
baby Rex has no poseability of any kind.
Realism:
this is not a very applicable factor for any Chaos Effect figure and
it's certainly not for this Ian Malcolm. It looks like something out
of a science fiction Saturday morning cartoon instead of a Jurassic
Park toy. It also has little similarity to Jeff Goldblum (who
portrayed Ian Malcolm in both the first and second Jurassic Park
movie), sporting a much younger and muscular look. The capture claw
is also not something likely to be used in the movies, though body
armour wouldn't have been such a bad idea. The Rex hatchling is
recognizable as a T-Rex (or close relative) by its shape, but its
paint job doesn't resemble the colour scheme of the Rexes seen in the
movies, or that of most other Rex figures except for the Omega T-Rex
of this toy line, which featured a truly bizarre colour scheme.
Repaint:
no, this figure is all new and so are its accessories and hatchling.
None of the parts in this set would be repainted for later toy lines.
Overall
rating: 6/10. It's not the best of human figures (by far!) , but not as totally
weird as some other Chaos Effect figures either. It comes with a
decent and fun weapon and useful body armour, as well as a
good enough hatchling, but overall this set is nothing really
special. It's one of the more common Chaos Effect figures, so if you
feel like you need one and can get it for a decent price you should
get one, but otherwise you needn't bother.
Labels:
action figures,
chaos effect,
dinosaurs,
ian malcolm,
jeff goldblum,
jptoys,
jurassic park,
jurassic park toy reviews,
mutants,
science fiction,
t-rex,
toys,
tyrannosaurus
woensdag 29 januari 2014
Today's Double News: Days of Future Past fully covered
As always I prove to be particularly drawn to posting superhero news on MS, and consequently reposting it here:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153410/marvel_wil_russos_terug_voor_captain_america_3
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153359/empire_onthult_25_covers_x-men_days_of_future_past
25 different magazine covers?! Am I glad I'm not a collector of anything X-Men, saves me a lot of money in this case. I doubt there would be many people - though I know there will definitely be some - crazy enough to collect them all if they can just behold them in Hi-Def glory online. And they certainly are glorious, me thinks. (Be sure to check them out right here to form your own opinion on the subject.) Though there's the usual Photoshop editing to post the various characters overly smoothly in the shot, you can't deny the full panoramic view of all 25 covers in the right order, moving from the Sixties to the (not too distant?) future, is quite an ingenious piece of work. I must admit I didn't even notice the big picture (literally) at first when I only saw the first six covers made available. However, it's the characters, new an old, that take centerstage on both the covers and in fan interest, including my own. We finally get to see decent shots of the much anticipated new characters, as well as the grim future appearances of beloved familiar ones from Singer's own first pair of X-movies. I'm first and foremost glad and thankful virtually all of both time frame's major players have returned, including personal favorites like Sir Ian McKellen, Patrick Stewart, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence and Ellen Page. Say what you will about the rather pretentious and arrogant cover text 'the biggest ever superhero movie', this film certainly has the most impressive cast to date of all Marvel flicks. The greatest fear in this regard is that with so many characters, few of them get a true chance to shine and many will be relegated to minor tidbits of interaction: a feeling not unwarranted since overcrowdedness has already cost Anna Paquin's Rogue her limited screen time, though oddly enough she's still present on these covers regardless. That said, if Singer proved one thing with X-Men and X2, it's that he knows how to handle star studded ensemble pieces, giving each character his or her due. I have faith he hasn't forgotten how to keep large casts worth our while on screen.
The most notable thing about these covers is the excellent new shots they provide of hot new mutant characters, namely Quicksilver (the first, as another will appear next year in the second Avengers film), Warpath, Sunspot, Blink and Bishop. A diverse bunch appropriated from the whole spectrum of the X-universe throughout its long history and hopefully not randomly thrown in the mix. Though Warpath, Blink and Bishop look a lot like their comic book counterparts (except with blacker costumes, to establish a sense of coherency in the bleak future X-look), Sunspot and particularly Quickie have underwent a few stylistic changes, in the latter's case no doubt to make him distinct from the other Quicksilver, which might follow the character's historically drawn dresscode more closely. As for Sunspot, maybe I'm just used to seeing him in full 'spot mode' too much to remember his actual physical regular appearance. What's more surprising than the addition of novel characters is the unexpected return of old ones, i.e. Colonel Stryker (who looks quite different from his counterpart in X-Men Origins: Wolverine, pushing that movie out of the cinematic continuity even further) and Toad (who also bears little similarity to the original as played by Ray Park). I'm guessing Toad will stay limited to playing the henchman as before, but Stryker clearly will have a bigger part to play as the film's secondary human antagonist (next to Peter Dinklage's Bolivar Trask), likely forming a liaison between the American military and Trask Industries as the pair of them engage in constructing mutant hunting Sentinels. As for those, they look spectacular. The past version looks retro and similar enough to the comic book robots to keep the fans satisfied (or me, at least), while the future Sentinel is a whole different beast altogether, which definitely allowed the design team to go all-out. As for the character design, I'm sure there will be ample whining about the black Batmanesque X-costumes, but I have little against them except they make for too uniform a look as opposed to the wildly divergent styles of costumes from the comics. Some characters make it work, like Colossus and Storm who look badass, while on others (Xavier, Shadowcat (here simply referred to by her real name Kitty Pryde)) the choice is less appealing. However, I'm all for substance over style, and as long as these are compelling characters played convincingly by capable actors, I have no qualms about their outfits. Not everyone can look like Mystique, who has found a perfect balance in that respect.
Aside from the background panorama, there's a few other little details to enjoy. I love Blink's teleporting window, revealing Warpath's back, and vice versa. Maybe the covers hint at a romantic relationship or some other personal connection between these newbie characters? Also of note is the difference between Wolverine's claws in both eras, the past showing the bone claws he originally was born with as illustrated in X-Men Origins: Wolverine (welcome back to the continuity!), the future witnessing him equipped with his well known adamantium claws instead. Since it was established Logan got the rare metal grafted onto his skeleton somewhere in the early Seventies, and the past section of X-Men: Days of Future Past as I understood it takes place in 1963 around the time of JFK's assassination, this fits the timeline neatly. And what's with the military look to Havok and Toad? They undercover or som'thin'? What's up with Quicksilver's utility belt? Why is Rogue all in white unlike the rest of her team members, and what's that spaceship looking thingy above here? These covers provide both answers and new questions, and prove more effective in terms of spawning speculation than the somewhat disappointing first trailer did.
In other news, Marvel is doing with the Russo Brothers what Fox recently did with Matt Reeves on Planet of the Apes, seemingly already hiring them on the basis of great expectations over concrete results for another sequel. I still say this is not the smartest move, but at least in the case of Marvel Studios advance planning of future projects has been shown to be taken much more seriously than is usual. And so far I have no reason to doubt the qualities of the Russos, as I very much liked what I saw of Captain America: The Winter Soldier so far. But who cares about a project at least three or four years in the future when you can drool over them X-covers some more? X-Men: Days of Future Past is only a few months away but thanks to promotional strategies like these the suspense is killing me. Considering the status of the original story line as one of the greatest X-Men classics and the presence of a humongous cast of talented actors, as well as this film's need to also serve as a decent set-up for the sequel X-Men: Apocalypse, the movie certainly has a lot to live up to. I trust Singer realized all of this well in advance. Considering his success on the first X-films, I'm willing to cut him some slack. X-celsior, Bryan!
Labels:
anthony russo,
bryan singer,
Captain America,
captain america 3,
Chris Evans,
covers,
joe russo,
Marvel,
moviescene,
russo brothers,
superheroes,
x-men,
x-men: days of future past
maandag 27 januari 2014
Today's Review: The Wolf of Wall Street
The
Wolf of Wall Street: ****/*****, or 8/10
You
might at first be inclined to ask yourself, 'a three-hour movie about
money, how can that be the least bit interesting?' Don't worry, for
Martin Scorsese's grand 'dramedy' The Wolf of Wall Street is
not a movie about money. In fact, the lead character himself directly
acknowledges this fear early on in the movie by stating that 'we
wouldn't be interested in all that stuff', afterwards largely
avoiding the subject altogether. So don't go in expecting any dreary
financial number crunching, since it's really all about what said
money (lots and lots and lots of it!) does with people. People,
inherently flawed, get progressively flawed – read: fucked up –
as their income increases astronomically. Meanwhile, every sense of
ethics, responsibility or even plain decency goes right out the
window. Scorsese's case in point: Jordan Belfort.
Belfort,
a superb piece of acting by Leonardo DiCaprio, starts out as many a
regular Joe from the middle class: screwed over by a financial crash
and reduced to unemployment, thus unable to provide for his loving
wife. All the more disappointing for him as he had just found a job
at a large Wall Street firm, where his boss (an impeccably loathsome
Matthew McConaughey) saw his potential and advised him not to abstain
of sex and drugs while on this job. Thanks to Belfort's talent for
agressive sales pitching, he quickly recuperates selling worthless
stock at a fifty percent commission rate, and before long he returns
to Wall Street triumphantly with a loyal band of peculiar misfits in
his wake (including Jonah Hill on steroids), all of whom have their
specific place in his grand scheme of taking money from the ignorant
masses that hope to make a quick buck on the stock market. The only
one making easy money are Jordan and his friends though, and before
long they become increasingly desensitized to the plight of their
clients in favor of their own ruthless acquisition of wealth. 'The
Wolf of Wall Street' is born, and despite Jordan's all too human
persona, such a term fits him perfectly, as this alpha male and his
pack of wild dogs scour the land preying on the weak and gullible to
feast upon their cash in a financial frenzy. One that seemingly knows
no bounds, as Belfort continues his practices for years without
sanctions or indictments, despite ongoing FBI scrutiny. Nevertheless,
Belfort needs no help in bringing him down, as he does a fine job at
that on his own.
In
many ways The Wolf of Wall Street is a fairly typical story of
a man gaining the world but losing his soul in the process, as he is
unable to keep his base instincts in check. Arguably, it's not the
plot that makes the movie stand out, it's the way Scorsese tells it
to his audience. Walking a fine line between comedy and drama that
finds both in perfect balance throughout the whole, The Wolf of
Wall Street proves infectiously hilarious at one moment and
effectively poignant the next. As Jordan's novel lifestyle as a
millionaire progressively takes its toll, his personal life spirals
ever more out of control emotionally and physically as his constant
drive for more and more dominates his every move. Fondly remembering
his former boss' advice, Belfort sets out on a course of rampant sex
and drugs without worrying about any consequences, as money will no
doubt solve any obstacles in his path. Small wonder his wife soon
leaves him as she finds him snogging a super model. Marrying said
model doesn't increase the happiness in his family life, children
notwithstanding. Abusing every conceivable illicit substance
imaginable also doesn't work in his favor. Despite the many yachts,
limousines, prostitutes and drugs, Scorsese makes it amply clear that
this is not a life to be envied as Belfort's once decent personality
is replaced by a greedy, amoral and self-annihilating character that
can only get the better of him, sooner if not later. Having become a
veritable slave of money, Belfort remains miserable, and we wouldn't
have it any other way, as his road to a personal hell is paved with
one outrageously funny messed up situation after another.
Aside
from DiCaprio's top performance, Scorsese gets the very best out of
his cast and crew in conveying this tale of human deterioration at
the hands of boundless greed, which often borders on the
unbelievable. Exploding planes, savage storms at sea, goldfish
eating, dwarf tossing and the generally lavish parties of debauchery
at the office heralding the weekend are among the many elements of
The Wolf of Wall Street that are so absurd, they can only be
true. In terms of comedy, nothing beats the delayed kicking-in of
exceptionally rare drugs that causes a most unwelcome physical
reaction at an hour of crisis at which the need to get home fast
results in one of the most humorous car scenes ever on the big
screen. Despite all the controversy, the many scenes of nudity and
excessive swearing feel rightfully placed, and credit must be given
to both the director and his brave cast to stick with such daring
material instead of catering to a general sense of good public taste,
something Belfort severely lacked. The fast paced, witty dialogue
written by Terence Winter proves to be in excellent hands of the
assembled cast of seasoned actors, including the likes of Jean
Dujardin, Rob Reiner, Jon Favreau, Kyle Chandler and Joanna Lumley.
Stylistically there's little to comment against the picture as the
ingenious editing, wonderful cinematography and delightful score,
featuring many a successful callback to the period in question, are
found to be in perfect sync to make for a superior cinematic
experience. But The Wolf of Wall Street at its heart remains
another intimate collaboration between the grandmaster Scorsese and
his personal muse DiCaprio, their fifth and finest thus far. The duo
makes damn sure you care enough about Belfort to run along with him
for three hours, but never are you really allowed to sympathize with
him, given his deplorable nature.
With
The Wolf of Wall Street, Scorsese has directed a modern
classic warning audiences of the destructive dangers of endless
self-enrichment, a film that is easily matched to any already
existing films on the topic. Belfort claimed to be inspired in his
professional shenanigans by the despicably greedy character of Gordon
Gekko (Michael Douglas) in Oliver Stone's Wall Street. Despite
Scorsese's upsetting picture of the life and times of Belfort in his
own Wall Street film, history has proven that there's always people
present who just don't get the picture as they consider the wildest
possible life of sex and drugs that money can buy the highest
achievable goal to strive for. With DiCaprio's sublime performance,
it stands to reason, like it or not, that in another three decades
we'll be watching movies about similarly morally bankrupt characters
based on actual personalities that will claim to have been inspired
by Jordan Belfort in 'that classic Scorsese film'. Not something to
look forward to, but a sad reality of what money hath ever wrought.
zondag 26 januari 2014
Today's News: are we ready to see this now?
Today for a bit of more recent news:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153322/eerste_poster_fifty_shades_of_grey
No Nymphomaniac type of shenanigans here. No suggestive imagery, orgiastic mug shots or full fledged revealing sexual material as in the case of that erotic movie's (excessively titillating) marketing campaign. Just a simple, respectable teaser of Christian Grey's respectably dressed backside. The only thing causing arousal here is what spectators bring to it themselves based on their own expectations, or for those who have read the infamous novel, experiences. For those familiar with the original writings, the poster may exude the promise of financial wealth - not everyone can afford such a splendid Seattle cityscape view after all - in the service of a handsome (?) young billionaire who owns a major company. There's quite a lot of potential for steamy sex right there, considering men with money are generally huge turn-ons. But if you don't know about the novel's (and thus the movie's) premise, this poster simply looks bland and not particularly exciting. 'Mr. Grey will see you now', the tagline states. But are we willing to see Mr. Grey?
Isn't the whole hype surrounding Fifty Shades of Grey since its very cinematic inception (which already is quite a while ago by now, considering all the casting troubles) causing us to spawn expectations that this film simply won't be able to live up to? Considering the recent news that the movie will contain less sex scenes that the book, for fear of overdoing it and thus making the movie feel like its droning on, I don't think this movie is gonna be especially arousing. Those who have read the book will no doubt complain about the lack of steamy sexy material, while those that are new to the franchise will wonder what all the talk was about. Or maybe it's a fact this movie, like is often said about the book, has a target audience that is simply limited to 'housewives': mature women dreaming about sexual escapades with younger men and experiencing them by proxy via this novel, which most other audiences would consider a dull read. If that's true, the movie has found its perfect director in 46-year old Sam Taylor-Johnson, who stopped just thinking about having sex with younger men and fullfilled that fantasy by dating and eventually marrying young Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kick-Ass, Nowhere Boy), less than half her age. Oh well, as long as they're happy who are we to judge... Whether Taylor-Johnson will satisfy viewers equally with her direction of Fifty Shades of Grey remains to be seen, and this poster is certainly not at all indicative of the film's eventual success or failure at the boxoffice. Fans will either get wet because of this piece of promotioanl imagery or consider it a boring start. The rest of us will wonder just who the hell this Mr. Grey is and why we should care in the first place.
zaterdag 25 januari 2014
Today's Triple News: the vice of mocking Triffids
This is what you get if you don't get around to posting your own news for a few days: it just piles up:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153308/potter_regisseur_maakt_remake_triffids
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153285/eerste_poster_hunger_games_mockingjay_part_1
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153241/bruce_willis_speelt_hoofdrol_in_sci-fi_thriller_vice
All fairly predictable news really. The Day of the Triffids is not specifically a commonly known science fiction movie, but has a certain cult following that assured more would be done with the property in the future than to stick to lousy miniseries on TV. It was a given the first Mockingjay poster would continue the trend in showing the bird logo in an altered fashion not so subtly parallelling Katniss Everdeen's rise to rebellion. As for Vice, that is probably the most surprising bit of news, in two ways. First, it's basically a Westworld copy ('synthetic staff of holiday resort abused by visitors strike back in a rage of vengeance' sounds suspiciously familiar, does it not?). Second, Bruce Willis supposedly plays a bad guy (it sure sounds that way judging by the film's plot synopsis), which doesn't happen every day. I'm not saying it's a first; e.g. Planet Terror or Perfect Stranger for example. But Hollywood movie stars of his stature have a tendency to stick to playing the formulaic role of an heroic character, as that's what their agents and studio execs expect the audience wants to see them play. Why change a winning routine that keeps bringing in the big bucks after all? Maybe because these stars themselves get bored doing the same thing over and over again? A change of pace also helps them gain respect as true actors (which some of them really aren't) as they get a chance to reveal their versatility by playing a type of character they usually avoid. I know Willis is talented enough to play a convincingly brutal villain, so that's not what's wrong with Vice in my mind. I just don't care much for an uninspired story like this. Again, judging solely by the synopsis (as nothing else is available yet), which seems clear enough. Especially when there's a Westworld TV series in the making at HBO, which assuredly promises us every vice this movie could come up with, and more.
As for the Triffids remake, it had to happen sooner or later, and the powers-that-be opted for sooner. The last adaptation, a dreadful miniseries of ill repute, debuted less than five years ago, so the name (which doesn't seem mistakable for anything else), may still be fresh on some people's minds, but likely not for the better. So undo the damage done by throwing another adaptation our way, overseen by a notable talent. Newell surely is talented enough, having earned his reputation with a diverse range of movies including Four Weddings and a Funeral, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, Donnie Brasco and of course his most famous (and undoubtedly most lucrative) film, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Carnivorous extraterrestrial plants seem like something he could handle between breakfast and tea easily enough. Still, as is the case with Vice, there's a danger of thematic repetition here. Day of the Triffids already sounds similar to the better know Invasion of the Body Snatchers in terms of story (already remade a few year back, also pretty dismal). What's more, the Triffids themselves are largely incidental, as the story is more about human intereaction in times of major crises, specifically man's ability to work together in (a lack of) harmony when society collapses. This theme, though still one that has the power to attract viewers easily, has been done a bazillion times already by now. In this regard, there's actually little narrative difference between Day of the Triffids and, say, The Walking Dead, except the latter already has succeeded in getting the audience's attention and respect as a serious (well, mostly) piece of audiovisual entertainment. A zombie Apocalypse is one thing, but the whole notion of an invasion by man devouring vegetables generally sounds ludicrous to most people, so if Newell wants his audience to take it seriously - which decidedly was the intention of the original novel at the least - he'll have to work hard to make us get over our initial negative expectations that would work against the film's favour. Thankfully he has also done Great Expectations, that might help.
As for expectations and thematic repetition (segue!), there's the new Hunger Games poster. This was one bit of repetition most people expected. As such, it's far from original, but given the rise of quality in the movies in question, no less welcome to inflame our hopes for an even more compelling finale (despite being cut in half to allow the studio to scrape every bit of milk out of Jennifer Lawrence's teats, pardon my expression). The movie isn't very subtle in terms of symbolism, and it's easy to deduce the shit has now hit the fan from comparing this poster to its predecessors, which showed a more obsequious jay, despite the constant appearance of flames indicating there's a lot of bottled-up anger involved. This time the repression has failed to keep the rage at bay and the mockingjay is finally spreading its wings in aggressive pride, its head held high as a symbol of defiance. It makes for a striking image, nevermind the little variation as opposed to earlier promotional artwork. Considering the number of different posters released for Catching Fire, I'm sure more inspired artwork will follow soon. This is only a tease after all. Plus, as the same piece of imagery concluded the second movie it isn't even wholly novel stuff to begin with. As such, you could also consider it a cheat. However, it certainly will succeed in drawing attention in theaters (probably just because it looks so familiar, causing an instant shock of recognition from "hungry" fans), and as such it's certainly a successful piece of work. The fact it saves money in terms of design costs is just a bonus for the studio, and a welcome one no doubt, as it's a given Mockingjay Parts 1 and 2 will cost a fair amount of cash to produce. Not the least of which will go to Jennifer Lawrence's bank account, as a raise in salary seems inevitable for such a "hot" (pun? You decide!) actress people can't seem to get enough of.
Labels:
alien invasion,
Bruce Willis,
day of the triffids,
mike newell,
mockingjay,
moviescene,
plants,
poster,
robots,
science fiction,
the hunger games,
the hungergames: mockingjay,
triffids,
vice
donderdag 23 januari 2014
The Lost World: Exclusive Utahraptor
Year
of release: 1997
Accessories:
-Dino
Tracker figure
-Three
pieces of capture gear
-Capture
Trap with backpack piece
-Flash
light
Description:
this big carnivore is bipedal, equipped with long arms with sharp
claws, as well as a big sickle shaped claw on each foot (both of them
poseable). This Utahraptor is much bigger than any other Raptor
figures (since it's not the same species as the well known
Velociraptor from the JP movies): it's a rather bulky figure with a
big fat belly (and a glued-over battery cover which reveals this
figure once had electronics inside), as well as huge feet. These are
rather pointless since the Raptor is not able to stand on them
because it lacks proper balance; it can only stand on all fours, not
on two legs. It does stand in a fully neutral posture though.
Utahraptor is equipped with a 'kick-slash' action: pulling both legs
back and pressing the button underneath the base of its tail (the
anal region) makes both legs give a powerful kick simultaneously, and
also causes the head to move and the jaws to open to a minor extent.
This
dinosaur figure has a beige underside (on the lower jaw, throat,
belly, underside of the tail, inner parts of the arms and legs and
underside of the feet) while it features yellowish brown colouring on
its flanks and sides of the tail, as well as on parts of the head. It
also has brown colouring on the arms and legs, but darker, mostly
because of the hard plastic those body parts are made of instead of
the more rubbery material the rest of the body is composed of. Utah
has a big black stripe running from the back of the head all the way
to the end of the tail with smaller big stripes running out from the
main one over the neck, flanks and tail. It has additional black
stripes on the arms, and more black colouring on the head and legs.
The claws on both hands and feet are also black, including the small
ones at the back of the feet, which are usually ignored in the
painting process. This figure has bright green eyes with black pupils
and tiny yellow stripes in it (though barely noticeable). Its tongue
and inside of the mouth are pink, and it has white teeth. Like the
other TLW Exclusive dinosaur figures (but unlike all other JP
figures), this Utahraptor has no JP logo anywhere on its body.
This
dinosaur comes with three pieces of capture gear. There's a big cuff
like tag, showing a JP logo on top, which fits well around the
creature's neck. It also comes with a leg restraint, which can hold
on to both legs simultaneously, but is a bit too long to properly fit
between the figure's legs. Lastly, there is a big muzzle which can go
around the figure's jaws, effectively disabling them, while also
covering the eyes, so the Raptor can't see what's going on around
him. All three pieces are coloured in the same metallic grey paint
job.
The
Dino Tracker stands in a fairly neutral pose, though the way he holds
his arms makes him look like a cowboy reaching for his guns in a main
street shoot-out. His facial expression is quite grim: he doesn't
look healthy anyway, since his skin tone is much bleaker than on most
other human figures. He has black hair, eyes and eyebrows. He sports
a dark green baseball cap with the classic T-Rex logo on it. He wears
a green shirt with pockets on his chest and has beige shoulder
patches on with a sort of armour look to them. Additionally, he
sports brown pants with similar patches of the same beige colour on
his lower legs. He also wears dark green boots and a black belt
around his waist.
The
Tracker's main accessory is the so called hair trigger capture trap,
which is like a bear trap except a few sizes bigger. It consists of a
boxy apparatus with two large rectangular “jaws” on each side and
a big black pedal between them. When the trap is opened, pressing the
pedal causes the jaws to close, trapping anything caught between
them. Except for the pedal and a small black antenna at the back
(which can be turned inwards), the trap is coloured entirely in a
shiny metallic grey colour. Though the trap has a small handle on
each side so the Dino Tracker can hold it with his hands, it also
comes with a black backpack (for lack of a better term) that can be
attached to the back of the trap so the Tracker can carry it on his
back. It fits perfectly over this figure's back, but can be carried
by various other human figures too. As an extra gadget, this set
comes with a large black flash light with a handle on top so figures
can hold it, and a flat underside so it can stand stable on the
ground.
Analysis:
of the three TLW Exclusive sets, this one is the biggest and comes
with the nastiest creature, a huge Raptor armed with big lethal claws
on hands and feet, ready to slaughter anything that crosses its path,
and no doubt inclined to attack bigger predators too. This is not a
new figure though, but a repainted JPS2 Utahraptor. It is also
retooled, having a harder skin (still softer than the regular hard
plastic, but not as soft as the original 'real feel dino skin'), and
lacking the electronics its predecessor was equipped with, so no
terrifying screech for this Utahraptor. Why exactly they got rid of
these electronics is anyone's guess, but it is a damn shame. It still
has the other original action features though.
The
most obvious one is the leg kick action. The kicking mechanism works
well: you can pull both legs back until they set themselves in the
right position, then push the button (invisible under its skin). Both
legs will plunge forward violently, knocking over anything directly
in front of them, including bigger dinosaur figures or small
vehicles. However, it's better to raise the arms somewhat, otherwise
they get in the way of the action. A great extra detail is that
pushing the button also causes the head and jaws to move (though less
enthusiastically than on the original figure, probably also a result
of the harder skin), so the beastie isn't just giving a kick, it's
also taking a bite at the same time. A really cool little detail is
the poseability of the big claws on the feet. They can move in at
least a 100 degree circle, and can trap unfortunate prey between
them. A real shame no other dinosaur figures with large claws have a
similar feature.
Despite
these nice positive sides, this figure does have some negative ones
as well. The most aggravating is the interdependency of the legs, so
they can't be posed separately, as well as the fragility of the leg
kick system, which gets broken all too easily (in fact, it seems even
more fragile than it was before, so that's not much of an
improvement). Other points of irritation are the overly big feet and
bulky squarish torso, which make this otherwise butch figure seem
silly, especially because it is not able to stand on its two legs
because the front part of the sculpt is much heavier than the back
part (which consists of its tail only). Also, because of the softer
material the skin is composed of, this figure's paint job is more
susceptible to paint wear.
Like
the original JPS2 Utahraptor, this creature comes with a set of
capture gear, including the tag that a lot of dinosaur figures come
with. It's quite big so less easily lost, and actually has a purpose
since it's the only part of this dinosaur showing it's a JP figure,
given the lack of a JP logo on the figure itself. The leg piece is
certainly of use in this monster's case, but a bit hard to apply
because of the small amount of space between the legs. The leg piece
actually is too big for this figure's legs. Also, it doesn't stop the
Utahraptor from kicking. The head piece does a better job, and
subdues the jaws as well as the eyes. There's no restraints for the
arms however, so the Raptor can still use those: it may even be able
to use its arms to pull off the head piece. This figure could have
used a better thought out set of capture gear in this regard.
Like
the other TLW exclusives, this set comes with a Dino Tracker and his
accessories. This guy sports a simple but effective set of clothes,
with some “armour” like highlights on his suit, but limited
enough to give him the necessary mobility to scout for dinosaurs
while still offering some protection in case things get rough. He
seems like a very serious man, given his emotionless face. But then,
trapping dinosaurs isn't an occupation you should take for fun, since
such a view might cost you your life on a dinosaur infested island.
His flash light is just an extra gadget and has no action features of
its own.
His
dinosaur trap however is an interesting piece of equipment, though
it's a bit bulky in size. It works quite well: pushing the pedal
closes the jaws with enough force to sufficiently trap anything that
comes between them. It looks best when it's used like regular traps
sporting this mechanism, lying on the ground (preferably camouflaged,
though that's unlikely with a trap this size), waiting for prey to
pass along. However, the Tracker can also carry it on his back (in
both opened and closed states), making for an excellent defence
mechanism in case some sneaky carnivore decides to attack him from
behind. But considering the size and weight of this weapon, he is
hardly able to stand up straight when carrying it on his back; it
certainly hinders his mobility as a Tracker. Also, it just looks
plain silly when he's carrying it around (the thing is almost as big
as himself), but at least this trap has some options. The trap is
capable of trapping almost any dinosaur, though it seems most suited
for big figures: after all, smaller figures would be severely injured
when they got stuck between this weapon's teeth (even though it's not
very sharp material), while hatchlings would just be cut in half
altogether. However, the Utahraptor may be a bit oversized for this
trap, especially its huge feet which can be caught by the trap, but
are so big the impact force is quite diminished. Also, it takes more
than just this trap to stop something as lethal as this predator.
Some extra weaponry would have been useful here, but this is all the
Tracker's got as his disposal.
Playability:
pretty good, especially because this set comes with both a dinosaur
and a human figure (and their respective accessories), so there's
more interaction options in this set alone. The Utahraptor has
moveable arms and legs, and even the big claws on its feet can be
posed, which is a feature not seen on any other dinosaur figures. The
poseability of the legs is hindered by their connection to the leg
kick action though, which also makes them incapable of being used
separately from one another. The leg kick action works well and will
knock over any human figures and most dinosaur figures too, but it's
a very close range attack option, and the arms have a tendency to get
in the way. The head and mouth motion is a neat little touch which
adds some playability to this toy, and the mouth is also big enough
to grab and hold human figures (though barely). The capture gear does
what it's supposed to do, but adds little to this dinosaur otherwise.
The leg kick action is quite fragile and gets broken rather easily,
so you shouldn't play too rough with it if you want to keep it
intact.
The
Dino Tracker has the usual range of poseable body parts (arms, legs
and head). The capture trap is a nice addition to this set, it works
well and is made mobile because it can be carried on the figure's
back, adding playability options. However, it's not the most
efficient piece of weaponry to combat the Utahraptor with: something
like a big rocket launcher would have been a more likely choice. The
flash light has no particular function but is a nice extra tool
regardless.
Realism:
Utahraptor was newly discovered (in 1991) by the time this figure was
originally designed (for the 1993-1994 JPS2 toy line), and as such
not that much was known about it (like the almost proven fact that
Utahraptor had feathers), so the Kenner designers basically made this
into a very big version of the Velociraptor as seen in the JP movie
(though Utahraptor did not play a part in the film, the Raptors from
the movie are often compared to Utahraptors because they are too big
to be Velociraptors, but a bit undersized to be Utahraptors).
However, they still got some things wrong, mostly the bulkiness of
this figure and the overly short legs and tail, making this figure
seem fat and certainly not like the agile superkiller it's supposed
to be. The proportions of this figure are just off, also because of
the original need for space for the electronics in this figure,
making it bulkier than it should be. Even though they took the
electronics out for this repaint, they didn't bother redesigning it
to make it look better. Of course, the designers did get some basic
things right, like the long slender arms and the sickle shaped claws.
The head is also not bad, though the jaws could have been a bit
longer. The size of this beast in comparison with human figures is
pretty close to the real deal.
The
Dino Tracker is not meant to resemble any actor from either the JP or
TLW movie, but he makes for an excellent Park Ranger or other
employee of Jurassic Park. His Capture Trap basically functions like
real bear traps (though it's fortunately just a toy version and isn't
in any way harmful), but its size makes it an unlikely instrument to
carry on one's back.
Repaint:
yes, this set consists entirely of repaints or reuses. The Utahraptor
is a repaint of the JPS2 Utahraptor, slightly retooled so it isn't
electronic any more and has harder skin. It features the same set of
capture gear as the JPS2 Utahraptor. The Dino Tracker is a repaint of
JPS2 Jaws Jackson, with the same set of accessories that figure
sported (capture trap, trap back piece and flash light), minus the
Dilophosaurus hatchling. The Utahraptor would not get repainted
again, and neither would Jackson (not as a whole at least, though his
head sculpt would be repainted for the human figures from the JP:
Dinosaurs 'Pachycephalosaurus and Dinosaur Trainer' set and the
'Young T-Rex and Dinosaur Adventurer' set).
Overall
rating: 7/10. The Utahraptor is still pretty good, though overly
bulky, and it's a shame they got rid of the electronics, but it got a
better paint job in return. The Dino Tracker is a fine repaint and
makes for an excellent Park Ranger figure, with decent accessories.
This set is quite rare, being a Target Exclusive, only available in
the USA. Both MIB and complete sets fetch high prices, so be sure you
really want this repaint instead of settling for the JPS2 Utahraptor
(which also isn't the easiest figure to find) and JPS2 Jaws Jackson
(pretty common), before spending lots of cash on this set.
woensdag 22 januari 2014
Today's Review: Ender's Game
Went to another press screening for MovieScene last week, and here's the result:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153155/enders_game_-_recensie
This movie was more thought provoking than I anticipated. Training kids' minds in order to manipulate them into becoming master strategists with no moral complexion to annihilate the enemy? Not the stuff you usually see in PG-13 movies. A lot of good actors - half of the child actors too have Oscar nominations already - though a lot of them didn't come off as particularly compelling because their characters were given little opportunity to grow on you. It's Ender's movie after all, and Asa Butterfield did a pretty good job carrying his film. Too bad about the obligatory hopeful and happy Hollywood close, but it doesn't hurt the shocking (though not hugely surprising) climax near the end of the film that shows us just how low Ender has unintentionally sunk due to his commanding officers screwing him over, all for the so-called sake of humanity. For a film that most at first glance would consider to be a generic Sci-Fi action flick, as such it packs a more powerful punch than expected.
dinsdag 21 januari 2014
Today's Double News: Amazon wants Barbarella, we want Game of Thrones
A few more items I collected for MS these past few days:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153167/set_visit_video_game_of_thrones_seizoen_4
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153191/amazon_wil_barbarella_serie
Good television series continue to be made due to ever growing public demand, and so the search for potentially profitable properties also drones on. While Game of Thrones is currently at the height of its popularity - despite its fabulous quality, you know in terms of success it can only go down at a certain point, and I think that's not far off, as there's little new audiences to be reached (except for paying ones instead of them dirty freeloadin' downloaders!) - rival studios won't sit still, looking for that next piece of audiovisual entertainment that grips spectators by the eyeballs and won't let go until the season is over, at which point it has proven so addictive that stopping the show would be nothing less than a crime against humanity. I doubt Barbarella will be that next hit. That is, if they stick to the campy, Sixties' tone of love and permissiveness established by both the original comics and the 1968 movie, which just seems to outdated. It's basically soft-erotic Sci-Fi escapism with a touch of surreal comedy mixed in. There's nothing wrong with that (far from it!), but would audiences be waiting for such fare in these darker, grittier times of crisis and misery, where serious and bloody shows like Game of Thrones reign supreme? Maybe I'm wrong and Barbarella will prove popular amongst mature audiences (certainly won't be a kids' show!) just because it's so cheerful and positive and silly, so it will be a great addition to the existing fantasy shows due to its different style. That is, if they indeed stick to the Barbarella of old instead of needlessly adapting her to the present times, which I hope they won't. With someone like Nicolas Winding Refn, a connoisseur of classic (or less so) movies if ever I saw one, at the helm, I doubt Barbarella will undergo many changes to her promiscuous personality, and I wouldn't have it any other way. Nor would the HBO-saturated audience that expects a fair amount of bare skin these days. But Amazon is not HBO, and would do well not to gratuitously copy HBO. Better the studio develops its own distinct personality, just like Barbarella has. If you want HBO, stick to Game of Thrones. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. I'm as pumped for Season 4 as the next man, and I have already scoured this seductive little video for any new revelations it might insidiously offer. Not much of those, except for a first glimpse at Mace Tyrell, and the continuing promise of a badass Red Viper. Just ten more weeks until Season 4 premieres, sit tight! And HBO, please keep these videos coming to help us get over any signs of withdrawal...
Labels:
amazon,
barbarella,
behind the scenes,
dino de laurentiis,
game of thrones,
HBO,
interviews,
jane fonda,
moviescene,
nicolas winding refn,
set,
television,
tv-series,
video
maandag 20 januari 2014
Today's Mini-Review: Deep Rising
Rating:
****/*****, or 7/10
Starring:
Treat Williams, Famke Janssen, Anthony Heald
Directed
by Stephen Sommers
USA:
Calimari Productions, 1998
Before
Stephen Sommers sank his teeth in remaking The Mummy (and soon
after milking it dry with various unwarranted sequels and spin-offs)
and before going totally overboard with the remaining classic
Universal Horror monsters with the lackluster Van Helsing, he
had already shown his affinity for monsters with this delightful big
budget B-movie. Assembling a diverse cast, including several notable
character actors that would later be seen in more ambitious fare,
Sommers brings us an excellent action chiller set on a luxury ocean
liner on her maiden voyage that has the misfortune of being boarded
by a band of ruthless brigands. Their trouble is something even more
insidious beat them to their target and swiftly proceeds to move
against them as well.
Treat
Williams (a veteran of all kinds of TV and movie work, just not of
the memorable kind) stars as smuggler captain Finnegan, who has taken
on the thankless job of transporting a group of dangerous
testosterone dominated mercenaries (think Aliens, except these
are bad guys) to the Argonautica, a gargantuan cruise ship and
playground for the rich and wealthy, that has just embarked on her
first trip across the South China Sea. Offloading the volatile,
loudmouth band of privateers – among them Djimon Hounsou
(Gladiator, Blood Diamond), Wes Studi (Avatar,
Hell on Wheels) and
Jason Flemyng (Stardust, X-Men: First Class) – should
be all in a day's work, but unfortunately all their plans are shot to
hell when it turns out something far more sinister and deadly already
boarded the boat and ate most of the passengers and crew. Stumbling
upon a few survivors, including sexy con woman Trillian (Famke
Janssen), the gang must soon alter their intentions as they are faced
with ghastly sea monsters that mean to slither their grotesque
tentacles all around their bodies to suck 'em dry. At least the
revelation that the mercs planned on torpedoing the ship after they
got away with the money allows them some firepower to retaliate and
save their skin, provided someone is left alive to blow the boat
sky-high. It's soon a matter of 'no honor among thieves' as it turns
out nobody here can be trusted, not even in the face of getting
devoured by slimey sea serpents, of sorts. Amidst pirates and sleazy
cruise ship managers it's hard to step up as the voice of reason, but
Finnegan attempts to do so anyway and at least succeeds in convincing
Trillian to bail out while they still can, also making for some
semi-romantic tête-a-tête between them that thankfully never gets
in the way of the real fun but actually gives them both the necessary
rogue-ish character. Unfortunately, Finnegan's contractors won't let
them walk away and are set to complete their mission, even all
through the maritime monster infestation that threatens to kill them
all. Working their way through the vessel, Deep Rising's plot
soon develops along the old fashioned 'ten little Indians' line, but
the pleasure to be had proves none the less of it.
Unlike
most of Sommers' monster movies soon to follow, Deep Rising
feels like an actual entry into the horror genre, instead of catering
to the 'PG-13 happy' crowd of Hollywood execs who want to make their
films as accessible to most demographics as they can, which led to
all his subsequent movies merely playing with horror conventions but
instead devolving into typical FX driven blockbuster spectacle.
Nevertheless, Sommers' willingness to throw in CGI where the budget
allows him can already be felt in this film as the creatures often
look overly digital (not surprising, considering digital effects were
still largely new territory around this time) and particularly
towards the climax end up being overused, but still the movie
contains its fair share of suspenseful and gory moments. If you ever
wondered what a half-digested human being looks like, here's an
answer for you and it is kinda disturbing to behold. Despite the
uneasy reliance on digital FX to allow the monsters to do their
horrific killing, in terms of sheer fast paced action interspersed
with moments of aptly timed comedy delivered by a cast that seems to
thoroughly enjoy itself, Deep Rising proves to be about as
entertaining as they come without feeling the need to be more than
just solid popcorn enjoyment. There's a reason the film's finale
comes with an hilarious open ended note – without the usual sequel
pretensions – that underscores that everything that came before
should not have been taken at all seriously, in case that was not
perfectly clear from the onset of the film. In the annals of
'delightful movie pairings', Deep Rising's 'modern pirates
versus sea monsters' deserves to be worthy of some credit.
Ultimately
this effective horror extravaganza failed to attract an audience and
became a typical box office bomb. Rather undeservedly so in my mind,
as I consider this a vastly underrated, hugely entertaining
action/horror flick. If you like dynamic action on the high oceans
and you don't mind a bit of sea monsters slaughtering humans
throughout, this is about as good as it gets. And if out of that
sentence only the 'action' part appeals to you, Deep Rising
definitely doesn't sink in its efforts.
zondag 19 januari 2014
Oscars 2014: My list of predictions
The long and dreary road to this year's Oscars has been put into motion, and no doubt people will want to know what I expect this year's winners to be. Not that I tend to care all that much about the Acadamy Awards or the whole dull press circus in the first few months of the year that accompanies it. It's just one big ritual going through all the usual motions. I much prefer to focus on the quality of these films on their own merits, without the huge buzz that surrounds them. Nevertheless, here's my list of guesses (which honestly is what they are, since you can analyze all you want but the Academy still has a habit of surprising you in the choices it makes, and often not pleasantly). I am not ashamed to say that in many cases I just go with what my gut tells me, something most critics are not prepared to admit.
Best Picture:
First choice: A tough one, as always. I can tell you which movies it won't be for sure, but as to the winner, for me it's a toss-up - as these events usually revolve around two very promising films with the results being about even, just as with the recent Golden Globes - between 12 Years a Slave, American Hustle, while possibly The Wolf of Wall Street has a shot as well. For now, my money is on 12 Years a Slave, which by itself must make up for the lack of other "black" pictures in these nominations, like The Butler and Fruitvale Station, which were lobbying for an award but didn't get very far apparently.
Second Choice: American Hustle.
Best Actor:
First Choice: Chiwetel Ejiofor, 12 Years a Slave. Same reason as above really. Plus, Chiwetel is a damn fine actor and though a first time Oscar nominee, he has already five Golden Globe nominations on his resumé. It's about time he won something.
Second choice: Bruce Dern for Nebraska.
Best Actress:
First Choice: Cate Blanchett for Blue Jasmine. An Oscar favorite that really needs a Lead Actress win, as opposed to a Supporting Actress take a decade ago. All the other female performances are impeccable, but this one just stands out supremely.
Second choice: Any Adams for American Hustle.
Best Supporting Actor:
First Choice: Barkhad Abdi for Captain Phillips. A stellar performance from a first time actor, holding his own opposite a veteran like Tom Hanks. You don't see that every day.
Second choice: Michael Fassbender for 12 Years a Slave.
Best Supporting Actress:
First Choice: No truly safe bets here, so I'll go with Jennifer Lawrence, since everybody likes her and so do I. Yes, that's also how this game sometimes works.
Second choice: Lupita Nyong'o for 12 Years a Slave. Same reason as Barkhad Abdi, except she has done slightly more.
Best Director:
First Choice: Steve McQueen for 12 Years a Slave. Again, same reason as why 12 Years a Slave is on this list of mine most of the times (though also because I haven't yet seen it so I can't underscore my argument in more detail). A black director winning an Oscar, doesn't happen often enough. Call me a racist if you must, but remember the b(l)acklash not so long ago when there weren't so many coloured people even nominated despite their considerable contribution to otherwise hugely nominated movies. Yes, they can!
Second choice: Martin Scorsese for The Wolf of Wall Street. Because it's about friggin' time this man took home another statue, considering how often he gets nominated but leaves empty handed.
Best Original Screenplay:
First Choice: American Hustle.
Second choice: Her.
Best Adapted Screenplay:
First Choice: 12 Years a Slave.
Second choice: The Wolf of Wall Street.
Best Animated Feature:
First Choice: Frozen. Apart from The Wind Rises, the other nominess are nothing remarkable (and poor Pixar simply got ignored this year, which was a long time coming really). However, that film seems too controversial, plus it's foreign material too. Frozen is a safer bet, as it carries all the good traits of a typical Disney movie, but shows the Mouse House is finally flowing with the times a little.
Second choice: The Wind Rises.
Best Foreign Film:
First Choice: La Grande Bellezza. This year's smash hit in arthouse theaters.
Second choice: Jagten. Better late than never, but not in time for a win. This movie is like 18 months old by now!
Best Cinematography:
First Choice: Gravity. The finest, most groundbreaking and impressive camera work I've seen in many years.
Second choice: Inside Llewyn Davis.
Best Editing:
First Choice: Gravity. Cuaron and his team once again make fabulous use of his trademark long takes, and the trick is you don't even notice the cutting.
Second choice: American Hustle.
Best Production Design:
First Choice: The Great Gatsby. Spectacularly lavish, the main reason to watch this film, which leaves something to be desired in terms of story and character. But it looks flawless.
Second choice: Gravity.
Best Costume Design:
First Choice: The Great Gatsby. Like I said, it all looks grand (characters included), it just doesn't feel it.
Second choice: American Hustle.
Best Make-up:
First Choice: already an uproar has commenced due to American Hustle being wrongfully snubbed in this category. Dallas Buyer's Club therefore seems the most eligible choice left.
Second choice: The Lone Ranger.
Best Music:
First Choice: Her. It needs to win something after all.
Second choice: The Book Thief. There's scoring, and there's John Williams.
Best Song:
First Choice: Frozen. Let it go, Academy! Let it gooooohooo!!
Second choice: Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom.
Best Sound Mixing:
First Choice: Gravity.
Second choice: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.
Best Sound Editing:
First Choice: Gravity.
Second choice: All is Lost.
Best Visual Effects:
First Choice: Gravity. I rarely experienced a movie that deserved this honour so badly. If Gravity loses, I call shenanigans on the Academy! Wouldn't be the first time though.
Second choice: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. The dragon looked badass, though I admit some other things in the film didn't appear nearly as stunning.
Best Documentary:
First Choice: The Act of Killing. Very disturbing but equally intriguing. May not be the Academy's cup of tea though.
Second choice: Dirty wars.
The first week of March will tell me how wrong, or maybe how right for a change, I just happen to be.
Best Picture:
First choice: A tough one, as always. I can tell you which movies it won't be for sure, but as to the winner, for me it's a toss-up - as these events usually revolve around two very promising films with the results being about even, just as with the recent Golden Globes - between 12 Years a Slave, American Hustle, while possibly The Wolf of Wall Street has a shot as well. For now, my money is on 12 Years a Slave, which by itself must make up for the lack of other "black" pictures in these nominations, like The Butler and Fruitvale Station, which were lobbying for an award but didn't get very far apparently.
Second Choice: American Hustle.
Best Actor:
First Choice: Chiwetel Ejiofor, 12 Years a Slave. Same reason as above really. Plus, Chiwetel is a damn fine actor and though a first time Oscar nominee, he has already five Golden Globe nominations on his resumé. It's about time he won something.
Second choice: Bruce Dern for Nebraska.
Best Actress:
First Choice: Cate Blanchett for Blue Jasmine. An Oscar favorite that really needs a Lead Actress win, as opposed to a Supporting Actress take a decade ago. All the other female performances are impeccable, but this one just stands out supremely.
Second choice: Any Adams for American Hustle.
Best Supporting Actor:
First Choice: Barkhad Abdi for Captain Phillips. A stellar performance from a first time actor, holding his own opposite a veteran like Tom Hanks. You don't see that every day.
Second choice: Michael Fassbender for 12 Years a Slave.
Best Supporting Actress:
First Choice: No truly safe bets here, so I'll go with Jennifer Lawrence, since everybody likes her and so do I. Yes, that's also how this game sometimes works.
Second choice: Lupita Nyong'o for 12 Years a Slave. Same reason as Barkhad Abdi, except she has done slightly more.
Best Director:
First Choice: Steve McQueen for 12 Years a Slave. Again, same reason as why 12 Years a Slave is on this list of mine most of the times (though also because I haven't yet seen it so I can't underscore my argument in more detail). A black director winning an Oscar, doesn't happen often enough. Call me a racist if you must, but remember the b(l)acklash not so long ago when there weren't so many coloured people even nominated despite their considerable contribution to otherwise hugely nominated movies. Yes, they can!
Second choice: Martin Scorsese for The Wolf of Wall Street. Because it's about friggin' time this man took home another statue, considering how often he gets nominated but leaves empty handed.
Best Original Screenplay:
First Choice: American Hustle.
Second choice: Her.
Best Adapted Screenplay:
First Choice: 12 Years a Slave.
Second choice: The Wolf of Wall Street.
Best Animated Feature:
First Choice: Frozen. Apart from The Wind Rises, the other nominess are nothing remarkable (and poor Pixar simply got ignored this year, which was a long time coming really). However, that film seems too controversial, plus it's foreign material too. Frozen is a safer bet, as it carries all the good traits of a typical Disney movie, but shows the Mouse House is finally flowing with the times a little.
Second choice: The Wind Rises.
Best Foreign Film:
First Choice: La Grande Bellezza. This year's smash hit in arthouse theaters.
Second choice: Jagten. Better late than never, but not in time for a win. This movie is like 18 months old by now!
Best Cinematography:
First Choice: Gravity. The finest, most groundbreaking and impressive camera work I've seen in many years.
Second choice: Inside Llewyn Davis.
Best Editing:
First Choice: Gravity. Cuaron and his team once again make fabulous use of his trademark long takes, and the trick is you don't even notice the cutting.
Second choice: American Hustle.
Best Production Design:
First Choice: The Great Gatsby. Spectacularly lavish, the main reason to watch this film, which leaves something to be desired in terms of story and character. But it looks flawless.
Second choice: Gravity.
Best Costume Design:
First Choice: The Great Gatsby. Like I said, it all looks grand (characters included), it just doesn't feel it.
Second choice: American Hustle.
Best Make-up:
First Choice: already an uproar has commenced due to American Hustle being wrongfully snubbed in this category. Dallas Buyer's Club therefore seems the most eligible choice left.
Second choice: The Lone Ranger.
Best Music:
First Choice: Her. It needs to win something after all.
Second choice: The Book Thief. There's scoring, and there's John Williams.
Best Song:
First Choice: Frozen. Let it go, Academy! Let it gooooohooo!!
Second choice: Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom.
Best Sound Mixing:
First Choice: Gravity.
Second choice: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.
Best Sound Editing:
First Choice: Gravity.
Second choice: All is Lost.
Best Visual Effects:
First Choice: Gravity. I rarely experienced a movie that deserved this honour so badly. If Gravity loses, I call shenanigans on the Academy! Wouldn't be the first time though.
Second choice: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. The dragon looked badass, though I admit some other things in the film didn't appear nearly as stunning.
Best Documentary:
First Choice: The Act of Killing. Very disturbing but equally intriguing. May not be the Academy's cup of tea though.
Second choice: Dirty wars.
The first week of March will tell me how wrong, or maybe how right for a change, I just happen to be.
zaterdag 18 januari 2014
Today's News: a deluge of more Spidey pics and posters
Here's another bunch of Spider-Man images I posted on MS:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153149/meer_nieuwe_posters_en_shots_amazing_spider-man_2
Are you getting tired of Spider-Man yet? I gotta say, this is really an agressive, in-your-face marketing campaign that Amazing Spider-Man 2 is witnessing. It seems there's new material made available every other day. And we still have more than three months to go before the movie hits, so I don't expect it to get any less any time soon, which means the movie's release will be hard to miss. New images is one thing, but what's the point of so many different posters? One possible answer in this case is building up (unconscious) franchise awareness. The 'Enemies will unite' tagline on the Electro one-sheet is a rather overt reference to the recently anounced upcoming Sinister Six spin-off movie, the groundwork for which is being laid right in this film. TAS-M2 introduces three(!) baddies from that notorious team of super villains from Spidey's rogue gallery, and if you count Lizard from the previous installment as another (though that has not yet been confirmed), you only need to spawn two more in TAS-M3 before the Six can have at the webslinger in the fourth film (also alreayd announced) and their own adventure afterwards (an all-bad guy movie would be a new one even for Marvel). As the trailers revealed - subtlety is not one of this franchise's strong suits - the identities of the missing pair have also been established already. But of course, the danger with so many characters is risking a convoluted, overcrowded movie. Remember how well (or not actually) Raimi's Spider-Man 3 fared in that regard, when it also let loose three antagonists on our hero? At least director Marc Webb will have a decent blueprint on how not to do things storywise.
And if a Sinister Six movie wasn't enough, it seems Spidey's archenemy Venom is getting his own solofilm too, though no word yet on how this character is gonna get introduced prior to that happening. The proposed project certainly won't build on Raimi's third Spider-movie (thankfully!). Since Venom needs to be (re)introduced through a Spider-Man film first (otherwise you completely ignore the origin of the character and his motivations), everybody's guess is he will pop up in TAS-M3 too, which means he could possibly replace Lizard as a Sinister Six member. But why then the privilege of a solo film? After all, it seems unfair and overkill if we would see Venom both in his own film and the proposed Sinister Six flick, unless he would be replaced by another villain in the latter, rendering the Sinster Six Venomless but justifying a Venom movie more strongly. As you can see, Sony Pictures' intended development of the Spider-Universe is already rife with questions about the future of characters not yet introduced, and that universe at present still consists of only one film. But a constant stream of images, posters and the occasional new vague comment from the director and execs keeps the fans' discussions and controversies going and ensures it will survive for a few more years. Are you getting tired of Spider-Man yet? If not, you probably will eventually, if those Spider-fans can't shut up about it until solid information is finally released.
Labels:
amazing spider-man,
amazing spider-man 2,
andrew garfield,
jamie foxx,
marc webb,
marketing,
Marvel,
moviescene,
poster,
sinister six,
spider-man,
superhero movie,
superheroes,
Venom
vrijdag 17 januari 2014
Today's Double News: Baron Von Strucker's walk of shame
Two recent newsflashes on MS, courtesy of myself:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153128/eerste_trailer_walk_of_shame
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153094/nieuwe_schurk_avengers_age_of_ultron_gecast
*Sigh* Here I go again, getting al emotionally invested in what appears to be a fairly average American comedy starring all the usual suspects. That means, I admit I laughed at this trailer. Not the 'ROFLMAO' type of laughter, but definitely a mild case of smirky giggling in the private confines of my own home where I could not be judged by others for this short loss of self-control. Walk of Shame has some potential, but then, a lot of similar comedies did these past few years and very few of them did not succumb to poor, predictable endings plagued by re-establishing overly conservative ideological social patterns, despite making us suspect they opted for a different route at the start of the film by suggesting a rebellious attitude (We're The Millers, anyone?). Iwould wager coin on the assumption that after her ordeal is over, Banks gets hitched with James Marsden and chooses a generic romantic entanglement over embarking on the busy, prestigious life of a successful career girl (it's usually one or the other, never both). Surprises don't seem in store for us on this one, but there's no great shame (see what I did there?) in saying the trailer looks to deliver two hours of mindless enjoyment regardless.
What was surprising this week was the revelation that the Avengers will face a second villain in their next joined venture, Age of Ultron. As if the likes of a homicidal robot hellbent on the annihilation of the human race wasn't enough of a threat, Earth's Mightiest Heroes must now also face an all too human (more or less) nemesis with ties to Captain America's past as a WW II hero. Former Nazi officer and current Hydra overlord Baron Wolfgang von Strucker has the dubious honor of playing second fiddle to James Spader's maniacal mechanical man, though how the two relate to one another in the context of the plot - if at all - remains to be seen. Considering their goals and personal drives, an alliance between the pair seems unlikely. Kretschmann's ability to make for a worthy adversary is a given though. The noted German actor with his surprisingly durable and flexible Hollywood career has been one of my favorite actors on the European continent since playing the badass Captain Englehorn in Peter Jackson's King Kong. Maybe he'll succeed in making the good Baron an interesting baddie for a change, since I found him to be a rather dull character in the comics. Who needs another ex-Nazi leading Hydra if you already have the formidable Red Skull for that job? Though I would still pick Hugo Weaving (who played that particular character on Captain America: The First Avenger) over Kretschmann every (other) day, I'm positive the latter actor will cause the Avengers quite some grief for our viewing pleasure.
donderdag 16 januari 2014
The Lost World: Exclusive Young Tyrannosaurus Rex
Year
of release: 1997
Accessories:
-Dino
Tracker figure
-Three
pieces of capture gear
-Dino
Damage wound patch
-Tranq
Bazooka (with two missiles)
-Backpack
Description:
this repainted Young T-Rex figure has not been retooled from its JPS1
counterpart, except it stands reared upwards more than the original
because of the way it is packaged. Asides from this, it stands in a
fully neutral posture, and still features “realistic” dinosaur
skin (though there is no such thing of course, since we’ll never
know for sure what dinosaur skin felt like), made of a more flexible
and softer material than the regular hard plastic. The figure’s
arms, lower legs and inside of the mouth are not composed of this
rubbery material. On its right flank a piece of skin can be removed,
revealing a dino damage wound underneath, showing white ribs and pink
muscle tissue. The wound patch itself is largely symmetrical in
shape. The Rex’s small two fingered arms are the only poseable body
parts. The jaws of this Rex, which can be opened by squeezing the
creature’s neck, provide the main attack option, revealing a very
bright pink tongue and inside of the mouth, and clean white teeth.
Apart
from the noticeable pinkness in this creature's mouth, this Young Rex
sports an otherwise dark paint job. At first glance it might as well
be entirely black. However, on closer examination, this figure's
paint job is made up of dark green with dark brown tones randomly
mixed in all over its body, most notably on the tail and upper legs.
Its underside (belly, throat, lower jaw, lower part of the tail) is
of a lighter green than the rest of its body, but still very dark.
The colouring on the lower legs and arms is much brighter, presumably
because of the different material they're made of. These body parts
are painted in a mixture of brown tones, one dark and one much
lighter, making them stand out more. Especially the hind part of both
legs and the underside of the feet are of a much different, brighter
colour quality than the rest of this figure. Additionally, the
dinosaur has black claws on hands and feet, as well as small white
eyes with black pupils in black eye sockets. As is the case with the
other TLW Exclusive dinosaurs, there's no JP logo found on this
figure.
Three
pieces of capture gear come with this Rex. There's a cuff like tag,
which comes with most dinosaurs featuring capture gear, but is quite
big in this case, and fits well around the creature's neck. It also
comes with a leg restraint, which can hold on to both legs
simultaneously. Lastly, there is a big muzzle which can go around the
figure's jaws, effectively disabling them, while also covering the
eyes, so the Rex can't see what's going on. All three pieces are
coloured in the same metallic grey paint job.
The
muscled Dino Tracker stands in a largely neutral pose, though his
right leg is pointed outwards to some extent, making him look like
he's bracing himself for something. Also, he holds his arms quite
close to his torso, more so than other human figures. He wears short
blue pants adorned with pockets, a belt and a knife at the back, all
in the same colour. He also sports a black vest, revealing a
muscular, bare chest underneath. The vest comes with green and red
detailing and a JP T-Rex logo (black Rex skull and arms in a yellow
circle) on the left part of his chest. Additionally, the Tracker
wears black boots with blue socks sticking out, a black belt around
his waist and a dark green baseball cap (which he wears with the flap
at the back of his head) with a second JP Rex logo on it. His skin
colour is somewhat lighter than on most other human figures. He also
has black hair, a beard with moustache, black eyes and eyebrows, and
a rather stony facial expression.
The
Tracker is equipped with a large bazooka, basically a black tube with
a small box at the end and a big one up front. On top of the gun near
the front end there’s a large red button. When the bazooka is
loaded with either one of the two red missiles it comes with,
pressing the button makes the missile be fired with force, with a
firing range of almost two metres and a good impact force. It’s one
of the more effective and powerful weapons Kenner produced. This set
also features a black backpack with black straps so the Tracker can
carry it on his back. The pack has two holes in it, one for either
missile.
Analysis:
as if two huge Rexes, a hatchling and a Junior Rex weren't enough for
the TLW lines, a repaint of the JPS1 Young T-Rex was issued as an
exclusive set, expanding the Rex family so it incorporates tyrant
king lizards of all ages. None of the TLW Rexes sport the same paint
job however, and this Young Rex is no exception, featuring a rather
dark, Gothic looking colour scheme. It's a rather original paint job,
but looks quite monochromatic on first sight. However, those who take
a closer look will find a very naturalistic and “life like” paint
job, instead of one of the typical 'brown with black stripes' schemes
that have been so overused. However, the arms and legs, and
especially the idiotic pink inside the mouth feel out of place on
this figure because they're so different, like the Rex sports an
unsuccessful mixture of paint styles. But still, the effort to do
something different should be applauded.
Apart
from the paint job, nothing has changed on this figure, which has had
two previous incarnations already. This Rex still comes with two main
action features. The first is the typical dino damage wound patch,
which was found on most larger dinosaur figures of the first JP toy
lines (and is also present on several larger TLWS1 dinosaur figures).
Removing the Rex’s wound patch reveals a nasty wound, which makes
one wonder what creature would dare attack a T-Rex (a larger T-Rex
maybe?). The wound looks gory, but the shape of the wound patch is
too perfect and artificial: it looks like someone just cut an almost
symmetrical hole in this little Rex, instead of him suffering from a
vicious attack by a rival carnivore.
The
second option applied to this figure is a so-called biting action.
However, these biting jaws are a rather cheap action feature, since
it’s only because of the soft material the dinosaur’s skin is
composed of that this biting action is produced. Various other big
carnivore figures come with biting actions, but more work is put in
those by adding inventive biting mechanisms instead, making this
figure's biting jaws pale in comparison. Squeezing the neck does open
its jaws decently though, while it can also be used adequately to
trap unfortunate figures’ body parts between them. It may not look
very appealing, but at least it works to some degree.
This
Young T-Rex comes with the same capture gear as its JPS2 predecessor
It does a very good job subduing Junior Rex, making it unable to
walk, bite or even see. The tag that comes with it actually has a
function here, since it features a JP logo the Rex itself is lacking,
so this dinosaur can be more easily identified as a JP figure. This
tag is also rather large, making its less easy to lose.
Though
it's still a good figure ans hasn't been really altered aside from
the new paint job, there's one slight modification made to this Young
Rex which has nasty consequences. It is packaged in such a way that
it stands up more straight, which can cause damage to the material
that holds together the two halves of this figure (the front part,
which consists of the torso with arms and head, and the hind part,
which covers the tail and legs). It's not unusual to see Young Rexes
that have a big split in the middle, as if someone took a knife and
tried to cut the figure in half but stopped halfway through the
process. Therefore, if you don't want this to happen to your TLW
Young T-Rex, be careful and don't play too rough with it. (This
warning also applies to the JPD1 Young T-Rex repaint which often
shows the same issue, but not to the JPS1/2 Young T-Rexes, both of
which rarely feature this disability because they were packaged
differently.)
This
set comes with a nameless Dino Tracker figure, sporting less clothing
than most other human figures have, which is obviously useful in warm
jungle environments where ferocious dinosaurs have to be fought. It's
a good new paint job on this figure (which is also a repaint), but
the abundance of black doesn't balance well with the rather bleak
skin colour on this figure, making him look somewhat sickly. This is
especially true of his head, which sports a big black beard and
moustache that look like they're fake. However, apart from this minor
complaint (and feel free to disagree) this is not at all a bad
figure, all the more so because he comes with an excellent weapon.
The bazooka, which remains unchanged in paint job and design from the
original that came with JPS1 Muldoon, is still a formidable weapon.
It works very well and has a great firing range for such a small
weapon, no doubt making it the weapon of choice for most JP toy fans.
The set also comes with the same backpack to store the missiles in
when unused. Both backpack and bazooka are still painted black, which
does make this set a little monochromatic, since the Tracker himself
sports a largely black outfit as well.
Playability:
for the set as a whole, quite good. Though only the arms of the T-Rex
are really moveable, the flexible material allows for additional
poseability to some extent (including the jaw motion). The dino
damage wound patch is easily removable and can also be put back with
little difficulty, but when applied to the figure it’s stuck strong
enough so it doesn’t fall off on its own accord. Though usually the
figure stands well balanced, more worn out Rexes occasionally have
trouble standing up straight and tend to stand in a tripod pose with
the tail on the ground. Since this figure is easily damaged, it's
better not to play too rough with it, also given its rarity. In fact,
if you want to play with this sculpt, it's better to play with its
JPS1 version instead of risking damage to this figure. The Tracker
has the usual range of poseable body parts (head, legs and arms). The
bazooka is one of the most effective and playable weapons of all
human figures. It has a great range and strong impact force, comes
with two different missiles for variety and the backpack provides
storage space for both of them, be it loose or on the Tracker's back.
The bazooka may not be strong enough to knock the Rex over, but it's
always a challenge to try and shoot the dino damage patch off the
dinosaur (in which case you need to loosen it a bit, otherwise it
won't let go). A bit violent for kids maybe, but fun nonetheless.
Realism:
though no Young T-Rex was seen in the movie, a juvenile Rex much like
this one played a minor role in Michael Crichton’s original novel.
This figure seems to be originally based off the book instead of the
movie. Of course, that doesn't matter in this repaint's case, for
which its medium size in comparison to the other TLW Rex figures
might have been the main reason to re-release it. Its paint job is
very different from the other Rexes of the various JP toy lines, and
doesn't resemble the paint scheme of the T-Rexes in the movies at
all. The Dino Tracker isn't supposed to look like anybody, being an
invention on Kenner's part. The bazooka wasn’t featured in the
movie, though it’s a more likely weapon compared to some of the
other pieces of weaponry Kenner came up with for the TLW lines.
Repaint:
yes, this set consists only of repaints. The Rex itself is a
repainted JPS1/2 Young T-Rex, with the same set of capture gear as
the JPS2 Young T-Rex featured. The Dino Tracker is a repaint of JPS2
Harpoon Harrison. His accessories originally came with JPS1/2 Robert
Muldoon, and these have not been altered in any way. The Young Rex
would be repainted (and retooled) again for the first JP: Dinosaurs
line, along with its capture gear. The Dino Tracker would be
repainted a second time for the JP III Exclusive Dino Tracking Set,
but with different accessories. The bazooka, including backpack and
missiles, would be repainted again (and retooled as well) for the
TLWS2 Eddie Carr figure.
Overall
rating: 7/10. On close inspection, this Rex has a very original and
realistic new paint job, but it hardly holds up from more than a yard
away. Other than that it's still a good figure, though the dino
damage provides the only real action. The Tracker himself is a fine
repaint, though the beard looks a bit silly. The bazooka is still one
of the best weapons ever produced for a JP toy. This set is worth
getting if you happen to find it for a good price, but since it's
very rare (it was only released at Toys'R'Us in the USA) and usually
fetches high prices, you might as well settle for a regular JPS2
Harpoon Harrison, Muldoon's bazooka and JPS1 Young T-Rex otherwise.
Labels:
action figures,
capture gear,
dino damage,
dinosaurs,
exclusive,
jptoys,
jurassic park,
jurassic park toy reviews,
Steven Spielberg,
the lost world,
toys,
tyrannosaurus,
young t-rex
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)