Posts tonen met het label visual effects. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label visual effects. Alle posts tonen
zondag 3 november 2013
Today's Column: Resurgence of the 'how do they do that' sensation
This month's column I wrote for MovieScene can now be read here as well:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/151186/column_heropleving_van_het_hoe-doen-ze-dat_gevoel
Needless to say I am not fond of the overabundance of digital effects in the cinema these days. It has caused an 'effects saturated' visual market, as well as raised a spoiled audience that has seen it all. Of course, this does make the consumers more demanding in terms of plot, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Except that they're finding it at home on TV instead of at the movies, which slowly but surely degrades cinema as a medium. I'm not at all against good television of course (quite the opposite in fact!), but I would like to believe the possibility of quality television and quality movies co-existing is reachable. Of course there's still plenty of excellent movies made, but people are having an increasingly hard time catching them in theaters as they're often dropped from regular circulation swiftly or aren't awarded a decent cinematic release at all. Watching them on-demand at home is a solution, but nothing beats seeing them on the big screen as their makers intended (usually, at least). They're often only making money in the long run, as opposed to the big budget spectacles that get all the attention in theaters but are ever more often relying solely on visual sensations that make them ever more interchangeable, bland routines, despite the hype generated for them to lure audiences in. But every once in a while, a visually spectacular blockbuster sees a release and provides something new in terms of technology, transporting the audience to brave new worlds and sights as yet unseen. This year it's Gravity, definitely the most immersive viewing experience since Avatar (which was released four years ago). Alfonso CuarĂ³n's thrilling tale of space peril continues to advance cinematic technology in a tradition of fantastic films over the course of the evolution of the medium that have truly amazed and inspired audiences like few other movies have done. It really makes you wonder how these amazing effects were accomplished, a question most modern audiences find themselves asking less and less. And that's where the angle of my column kicks in.
Another column done, now for next month's piece. Currently I have no clue as to what it will be about. But I'm sure I'll manage, as I've done so far.
zondag 13 oktober 2013
Today's Mini-Review: Gravity
Gravity: ****/*****, or 8/10
It
is rare these days to encounter effects in movies that look so
astounding that they pull the audience in completely and won't let go
until the credits roll. After twenty-odd years of increasing overuse
of CGI, it seemed positive that everything had been done, also owing
to the plethora of home video releases containing behind-the-scenes
footage that reveals in detail the tricks of the trade, thus
enhancing the audience's expertise on what is real and what is not
when watching a film. It has diminished the emotional impact of the
contemporary blockbuster, which often tends to rely heavily on such
big budget effects work, because we spectators think we've seen it
all and know it all by now. But once in a while a movie comes along
that does manage to sweep us off our feet entirely and immerses us
completely into the world its director has envisioned for our viewing
pleasure. In such uncommon cases, the often derogatory term 'effects
film' turns out both wholly justified and incorrect: the effects it
contains do not make a film, but instead engage us into a full
fledged cinematic experience we cannot help but be captivated by so
strongly that all we can do is undergo it until it releases its grip
on us. And then we still sit back in awe for a while longer, with
that most pertinent of questions firmly on our minds: how on Earth
did they do that?! Alfonso Cuaron (Children of Men, Harry
Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban) has crafted just such a
fantastic experience with Gravity, a superior science-fact
feature that adheres to the laws of physics but constructs its own
laws in terms of what you can accomplish cinematographically these
days. From a narrative point of view it's simply the struggle of two
astronauts (George Clooney and Sandra Bullock) to survive in our
planet's orbit after their space shuttle has been devastated by space
debris caused by the demolition of a Russian satellite. In every
other regard, there is nothing simple about Gravity.
It
is most definitely one of the greatest accomplishments in the field
of visual effects and 3-D technology in recent years and an
incredible tour-de-force on the part of both actors whose
capabilities are put to the most extreme test imaginable. In fact,
you are pulled in so deeply you neither have the time nor the
interest to agree the story is pretty bare and the few attempts at
introducing deeper levels of character development – including
Bullock's character still trying to cope with the death of her young
daughter – don't add all that much to the protagonists' plight. We
run with them because we cannot help but feel we are one of them, and
we too must get out of this ordeal in one piece before time (and
oxygen) runs out. Applying his signature use of the 'long take',
Cuaron opens the movie on a quiet, peaceful note as we witness “our
fellow astronauts” working on a telescope, a job that suddenly
turns extremely hazardous as the debris field hits their workplace
hard, cutting them loose, adrift into the endless black ocean of
space: all in a single, apparently uninterrupted shot (though few
will actually consider that fact as we are already engaged fully by
this point). We're slowly introduced to their Zero-G environment, but
soon must deal with intense camera movements as we float around the
shuttle in fast motions at first, and soon almost unchecked as the
mission is spiralling out of control. Their spacecraft lost, our
fellow pair of astronauts must make its way to the ISS before it too
gets hit by the rubble, and before they run out of breathable air, if
they ever hope to get back down to Earth. Unfortunately physics don't
make it easy on them and reaching their goal appears ever more
hopeless. All to our benefit, as we are treated to some of the most
spectacular visual imagery seen on the big screen in years. Gravity
is a prime showcase of what 3-D can add to a film other than a higher
admission price. Not only is the cinematography breathtaking, we feel
part of a three-dimensional environment at all times, surrounded by
pieces of space rubble on every side, or Bullock's sweat and tears
when we are locked in an escape pod with her in very close quarters.
The intricate shots of floating equipment and people going up, over
and around each other adds a layer of depth that is not likely to be
surpassed in film any time soon. Even though the lack of sound in
space deprives us of an auditory experience the likes of Star
Wars, the immersive visuals make us forget all about any lack
where other sense are concerned. Credit is also due to the seasoned
actors, Bullock in particular, that make the whole experience feel
that much more convincing – though the effect the film has on our
stomachs does half their work already – by delivering excellent
performances few of their colleagues could have matched as they play
off against each other and... yes, against what else, exactly? How
much, if anything, of what we seen on screen was there to aid them?
Even for a trained eye, it's nigh impossible to tell where the real
setting ends and the fictional construct begins. Yet we never get the
feeling we are watching visual effects, which is of course exactly
the trick such effects aim to pull off: don't let the audience know
you are only an effect. The result is a staggering, completely
compelling cinematic experience, one best seen on the big screen as
it is doubtful its full physical and emotional impact is done justice
on a home cinema release, though hopefully the latter can tell us
just how Cuaron and his team managed to accomplish this extraordinary
feat. One thing is for sure, Gravity is gravitating towards
well deserved Best Visual Effects and Best Cinematography Oscars.
zaterdag 24 november 2012
Today's Film: The Day After Tomorrow
The
Day After Tomorrow
Rating:
***/*****, or 7/10
Probably
Roland Emmerich's most typical disaster movie, delivering grandiose
spectacle as catastrophe strikes and actors attempt to survive the
many pixels the visual FX departments throw at them accordingly.
Joining on the doomsday bandwagon of both scientists and laymen
alike, Emmerich depicts the coming of a new ice age due to mankind's
arrogant tampering with the planet's environment. Caused by global
warming, ocean currents change and a series of super storms evolve,
hitting the northern hemisphere hard, resulting in giant tornadoes
levelling Los Angeles and tsunamis engulfing New York City. Things
get even worse when temperatures drop rapidly and the latter town
freezes over completely, leaving a boy (Jake Gyllenhaal) and his
friends trapped in the city library, with his father (Dennis Quaid)
setting out on a desperate trek across the frozen wasteland to come
and save him. Though the prospects of global warming (or global
meltdown for that matter) aren't particularly attractive in real life
either, Emmerich goes all-out without really bothering with the laws
of nature for realism's sake. The movie is therefore much maligned
amongst the scientific community for its preposterous display of
dramatic natural effects supposedly caused by global warming, but the
message stands that we had better try to avoid the Earth cooling down
or warming up for our own health anyway. Like any disaster movie, the
true star of the film is the disaster itself which makes for a highly
entertaining watch, while the human drama in-between moments of
thrilling calamities is less compelling, at times even obnoxious for
getting into the way of the action. Most spectacular is the flooding
of New York, despite the overly digital quality of the piece. After
that, the big freeze and a wolf attack upon the protagonists provide
some more thrills but the best bits have come and gone, though all
too brief moments of satire, like Americans crossing their southern
border to get into Mexico illegally, generate a good laugh
occasionally. Emmerich would find even more stuff to demolish in his
disaster flick to-end-all disaster flicks 2012, as the fate of
whole mankind and indeed the entire world lies in the balance: after
all, the southern hemisphere got off too lightly in this film.
Starring:
Jake Gyllenhaal, Dennis Quaid, Emmy Rossum
Directed
by Roland Emmerich
USA: 20th
Century-Fox, 2004
Labels:
dennis quaid,
disaster movie,
flood,
ice age,
jake gyllenhaal,
roland emmerich,
science fiction,
survivors,
the day after tomorrow,
tomorrow,
tornado,
visual effects,
wolves
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)



