Posts tonen met het label Alexander Skarsgard. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Alexander Skarsgard. Alle posts tonen
dinsdag 9 september 2014
Today's Column: True Blood has died the True Death
Overdue by a few days (by no fault of mine, I upheld my deadline as always), but here's my latest online column:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/157062/column_de_ware_dood_van_true_blood
Boy, am I glad that is over and done with. And not because it was so dismally bad as some would have you believe, though the finale did leave a lot to be desired. But so did the rest of the season, so at least there is some inner consistency. There's a lot to be said against this last season in terms of story, but there were still several plot lines and especially characters I continued to enjoy and appreciate. And in that case, True Blood at least can boast a genuine ending, unlike most other shows that suffer increasing deteriorating ratings and heavy fan critique. The greatest thing about this finale is that it does indeed feel quite final and the show was permitted a decent send-off in that regard, rather than face cancellation and leave us all in the dark as happened to so many shows (and a lot of them deserved better). We can now all close the Sookie Stackhouse chapter of our lives peacefully, as to my mind any show should be ended. Of course, there were a few story threads that didn't feel wholly resolved and more of those that I felt should have been handled entirely different, but there's few shows that even get to this point without screwing a thing or two up. Only two recent examples of shows that were granted a final farewell sprung to mind, Breaking Bad and Spartacus. Admittedly, both of those ended on a superior note, but they were much more coherent in their quality throughout their run, while True Blood from the get-go tended to meander between well executed plot threads and those less so, featuring both wonderfully charismatic characters and their barely watchable counterparts. We'll have to make do without both, from now on. No more Maenad orgies, conniving witch covens and endless droning about who Sookie will jump into bed with this time, but also no more shrewd vampire politics, stupendously supernatural situations and Eric Northman. Not every blood type variety of Tru-Blood proved as delectable, but I still regret having to return to strictly human beverages again after seven years.
donderdag 13 februari 2014
Today's Triple News: Scar-Jo transcends Tarzan
Three news flashes today, I've been busy!:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153735/harry_potter_regisseur_neemt_herverfilming_tarzan_op_zich
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153733/nieuwe_trailer_en_poster_transcendence
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/153709/eerste_trailer_en_poster_voor_under_the_skin
Not much 'news' among all this news. Tarzan is one of those literary characters that has been made all the more iconic because of the movies, and has been remade, revamped, and reimagined over and over again, giving us a new take on the character every five years or so. In fact, the last version, a German produced animated 3D movie, only debuted this Christmas. But it's been a while since Hollywood did a live-action remake of the Lord of the Apes, and now is as good a time as any. Then again, the last Edgar Rice Burroughs character that got himself a major blockbuster film didn't do so well: remember John Carter? I loved it, but unfortunately most other people couldn't care less (bastards!). That said, this was JC's first movie (and sadly, quite probably his last...), while Tarzan has proved himself an enduring screen legend many times over, putting him into the same category as those other big instantly recognizable big name movie franchises that keep coming back, the likes of Godzilla, Sherlock Holmes, Dracula and King Kong. David Yates seems like the right man for the job, having directed four huge box office hits for Warner already (all Potter, so kind of a one-note big budget career, but still). The hunky Swedish vampire Alexander Skarsgard is set to star, no doubt the tallest and blondest actor to have played the character thus far. I hope Jane won't mistake him for a tree as she seeks a vine to swing with. And no doubt Tarzan's gorilla posse will be digital. In the wake of the success of the rebooted Planet of the Apes saga, more on-screen apes should have been expected.
Not exactly remakes, but still suspiciously familiar to movie buffs, is the subject material of both Under the Skin and Transcendence. The former introduces a hot woman looking for men to have sex with, actually being a succubus alien abusing mankind for her own sinister schemes. That screams Species, a lot. And the "plot twist" that she starts to understand and love humanity hearkens back to Species 2, where the former antagonist underwent a 180 degree objective shift and become loveable. Nevertheless, this looks much more esoteric and dreamy than those films, arguably executed to be the arthouse version of that story. Or something else entirely, as a lot of plot material for this film is still left vague. Maybe the trailer only reminds us of Species, while the actual film turns out a whole different animal entirely. No matter. Any film that gets Scarlett Johansson stark naked doing the nasty throughout sounds like it's worth a film nerd's while. And before you accuse me of being a pervert, let me remind you I'm only watching the stuff she chose to act in. I didn't make it.
The latter trailer - of Transcendence, for those readers with short term memory imperfections - features a human intelligence downloading himself into a supercomputer, after which his newfound power gets the best of him and mankind's fate soon hangs in the balance. Also a case of 'been there, done that, keeps being an interesting topic'. Avid Sci-Fi geeks will recognize most of the plot from various episodes of Star Trek, The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits, but first and foremost to my mind came the seminal computer thriller Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970). That film involved a Cold War supercomputer based on the brain patterns of its creator, that linked with its Soviet counterpart and subsequently decided to end all human conflict by imposing its rule upon mankind. As is typical of the gloomy atmosphere of the late Sixties and the early Seventies (gotta love those dark downer endings!), it did not leave room for a happy end as ultimately, the computer triumphed and man basically became his bitch. I don't think Transcendence will have the balls to go that far. Though not devoid of addressing interesting notions on the increasingly fine line between man and machine, its otherwise looks like a standard Hollywood Sci-Fi action flick, complete with love interest (triangle, even?) and no doubt an ending that won't prove so depressing for the general audience that merely seeks diversive entertainment. That said, it looks like a very enjoyable standard Hollywood Sci-Fi action flick, one which I fully intend to see. After all, when movies fail to develop new ideas and resort to recycling those that came before, what else is a movie lover to do?
donderdag 28 november 2013
Today's Mini-Review: What Maisie Knew
What
Maisie Knew: ***/*****, or 6/10
Some
children are blessed with loving parents, while others are stuck with
horribly egocentric folk that just can't get along, to the detriment
of their offspring. Poor Maisie (young newcomer Onata Aprile, only 7
years old at the time of shooting) unfortunately has to contend with
the latter, as her terrible excuses for parents, played by Julianne
Moore and Steve Coogan, simply cannot see eye to eye about anything
and only communicate by shouting at each other and arguing ad
nauseam. Maisie can't remember ever seeing them in another, happier
state of their relationship and has gotten used to their constant
petty bickering, but doesn't let it get her down as she tries to make
the best of it. Of course, the question always on our mind is: does
she understand that the emotionally unhealthy environment she's
growing up in is not the regular way for children to mature? Could
she ever choose between her mother or her father if it came down to
it as they are both lobbying for her unwavering love? Coogan and
Moore certainly excel in playing people you just can't help but hate
for how they're so obviously ruining Maisie's childhood, a fact they
ignore becayse they are more concerned for besting the other in
winning Maisie's love. While we are busy detesting these horrible
guardians for causing her to accept a living condition that is quite
simply unacceptable to behold for anybody with a slightest sense of
reponsibility, hope looms on the horizon as her parents both mix up
with just the right people to turn her life into a more positive
direction. Her father marries her foreign (Scottish) nanny, while her
mother hooks up with a seemingly not so bright, tall guy (Alexander
Skarsgård attempting to shed some of that sinister, scheming vampire
image of his, courtesy of True Blood, by playing a sweet,
easily likeable bartender). Unfortunately the story soon progresses
in the most predictable of directions as these two people, who
actually care more about Maisie as a person than as a means of
annoying the other by acquiring custody of the girl, come to
understand just how easy it is to love this charming child and agree
how much she deserves to be taken care of by decent folks. And
naturally they can't help themselves by also falling in love with
each other when they realize just what a manipulative, sleazy people
Moore and Coogan are, abusing both them and Maisie for their own
purposes as they keep up their disgusting little power play. In terms
of plot development, we soon come to know that What Maisie Knew
has little surprises to offer while delivering its fairly repetitive,
one-sided melodrama. The film makes up for this in the acting
department, where young Aprile stuns the audience with a most
exceptional, truly inspiring and convincing performance; a remarkably
rare occurrence for such a young child, but a solid promise for her
future career in acting should she decide to keep it up (we can only
hope). While the adult actors go through the motions in a more
regular fashion, which isn't devoid of merit but simply not nearly as
mesmerizing, Aprile carries the film as very few other actresses her
age could ever have done, proving just how much truth there is in
that old adage that good casting is doing half the work. What
Maisie Knew is just average in all other regards, but a fabulous
performance like this is well worth checking out, as it is so seldom
witnessed.
woensdag 4 september 2013
Today's News: all blood things must come to an end
Suck on this, fanger!:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/149798/true_blood_stopt_in_2014
It's not like we didn't see this coming. The moment a showrunner quits, you know the end is near. Alan Ball quit after True Blood's fifth season, and season 6 apparently suffered for it. I have yet to see that part of the show so I can't agree or disagree on its quality (nor can I say whether it was "bad" enough to justify ending the show), but the ratings spiralling downwards are an undeniable fact. The show followed a quality pattern as it was, where the odd number seasons were great and the even number seasons proved disappointing (but still watchable) by comparison. Hopefully the last season, number seven, will continue this trend and end the show on a grand note, worthwhile of what passed before. It's commendable HBO has decided to give True Blood a decent farewell run at all instead of just pulling the plug entirely and leaving us with many a cliffhanger to speculate over for all eternity. Imagine how frustrating that must be for someone who's among the living dead!
Oh well, we sure had some 'good times' with this show. Fortunately, we still have some more of Boardwalk Empire and Game of Thrones to look forward to on HBO. Plus, the money for its new Westworld show had to come from somewhere...
Farewell Sookie Stackhouse. And goodbye viking/entrepeneur vampire who always stole the show...
zondag 20 mei 2012
Someone please sink this battleship...
Battleship: Rating **/*****, or
3/10
It seems
the alien invasion subgenre of science fiction is in full decline as
far as quality is concerned, though when it comes to quantity, it's
rarely done better. The last few years numerous alien invasion films
have invaded our movie theatres trying to rule the box-office, but
most of them failed due to humanity's natural resilience against bad
movies. Last year's examples include Skyline, Cowboys &
Aliens, The Darkest Hour and Transformers: Dark of the
Moon, but on the 'badness' scale none of these were a match for
the stupendously dismal World Invasion: Battle Los Angeles,
which chronicled the fight of a rag-tag group of marines against a
vastly superior extraterrestrial intelligence. It was a complete
defiance of logic and a total waste of everybody's time and money,
particularly for the audience – okay, so I can get in for free, but
I'd still like those two hours back...– Now Battleship
comes sailing into the cinemas to pull off the same trick (i.e., bore
the audience some more at the expense of their no doubt hard earned
cash that had better be spend on something more worthwhile), except
it takes the fight to the seas instead of rehashing the land based
routine. And in the process it manages to defile the name of a
classic board game, on which it claims to have been based, though the
connection is hardly ever present, other than in the simple presence
of a battleship.
Apparently
using the concept of one fleet of ships being pitched against another
and taking each other out was either not politically correct in the
current climate, or the studio executives considered it too boring.
So the line of thought seems to have been that if there's no human
adversaries to combat, the threat must come from outer space.
Battleship opens with an expositional scene explaining the
existence of large radio telescopes on Hawaii which are used to send
signals to a distant solar system that might contain an Earth like
planet. Lo and behold, the signals are received and the resident
aliens return our call of hospitality by sending in an invasion force
which crashes into the Pacific – except for one starship which hits
downtown Hong Kong instead, resulting in the typical levels of
destruction à la Armageddon,
spectacular but devoid of emotion – around the same time a
huge international naval exercise is underway in that area, featuring
participants from many countries, and of course led by the good ol'
United States ready to gallantly defend our freedom from foreign
agressors seeking to take it from us (think Independence Day,
except with less impressive results on all fronts).
Naturally,
a face must be put on the heroic side to make the resulting drama
(what little of it there is amidst all the action anyway) feel
compelling, and that face belongs to Taylor Kitsch, in the role of
Lieutenant Alex Hopper. Kitsch recently managed to save Mars from
internal political turmoil by uniting warring factions against a
common enemy in the epic space opera John Carter, so this next
task should prove easy enough for him. Alex is kind of a rebel, a
loudmouth screw-up with problems adhering to authority, who is about
to get kicked out of the navy, much to the chagrin of his more
responsible and successful older brother Stone Hopper (portrayed by
everybody's favorite True Blood vampire actor Alexander
Skarsgard, no fangs) who hoped the navy would provide some much
needed stability for his loose gun kid sibling. To complicate
matters, Alex is madly in love with the daughter of Admiral Shane
(Liam Neeson in a typically commanding performance, something we're
used to in his case), so the admiral holds him in great contempt and
is all too eager to dismiss him from the service. Fortunately for
Alex, aliens conveniently come and provide an opportunity to prove
his worth and set things right, saving his love life and his career.
Warning!
Here be spoilers! During the navy war games, strange objects
are spotted in the ocean, at which point the admiral dispatches three
vessels to investigate, including Alex's. Upon closer inspection, the
objects turn out to be (very digital) alien spaceships which
immediately deploy a huge force field, which envelops the Hawaii
islands, and cuts the fleet off from the three destroyers locked
within, after which a cat and mouse game ensues between the human and
alien warships involving a lot of gunfire and explosions. Why the
aliens can't simply protect themselves with separate force fields
instead of proving to be all too easy to destroy with simple cannon
fire is just one of the many questions the conflict raises over the
next hour and a half. Within ten minutes two out of three navy ships
have been destroyed and all officers including bloodsucker Eric
Northman have been killed off, so Alex gets his chance to shine and
kick some alien ass, accompanied by his distrusting crew who give him
the benefit of the doubt only to find he can do the job after all.
Among the ranks we find the recording artist Rihanna, offering some
female empowerment in her first film role. Don't worry, she doesn't
sing, and neither does she do much acting.
The
aliens' interest in the Hawaii islands, other than their stunning
natural beauty and fantastically sensual beaches of course, is
focused on the presence of the aforementioned telescopes, which the
aliens mean to commandeer so they can call in reinforcements from
their home planet, since their space craft downed in China apparently
was the only ship capable of communicating with home base (yeah, that
makes perfect sense, if you take your audience to consist solely of
morons). The action of Battleship therefore is not limited to
the ocean, but also witnesses a struggle on land between the aliens
and a small group of valiant braves consisting of Alex's girlfriend,
a local telescope scientist and a crippled marine with prosthetic
legs, attempting to foil the evil schemes of the invaders. Of course
the girlfriend is total eye candy, the scientist is a stereotypical
hairy nerd who turns to cowardice (after all, science created this
mess which the navy must now clean up) and the ex-marine feels like
an uncomfortable attempt to give credit to the many battle scarred
troops in the armed forces who might not be compatible with the hard
business of soldiery anymore but can still prove to be useful human
beings when it comes down to it. A noble sentiment, but not the best
time to express it if you want the audience to take things seriously.
The
movie proceeds to press the latter point too much when the plot calls
for a new ship to save the day after the three destroyers have met
the fate their class name suggests they should have done to the
enemy. Only one true battleship remains, the near legendary USS
Missouri, and though it's a museum piece she's still ready for
action, as is the sturdy crew of very old veterans who preserved her
and get called upon for active duty once more. And so the movie
reaches its lowest point when we see these seniors walk down the
decks in excessive slow motion as truly heroic characters, reporting
for duty in order to save the day. Any sense of seriousness this
movie might have offered before this point now gets completely undone
in a single moment of utter camp, while it remains unclear whether
this is what director Peter Berg (also responsible for the not so
funny superhero spoof Hancock) intended.
And so
the final battle for the fate of the planet begins, when the Missouri
squares of against the vile extra-terrestrials all by itself guns
fully blazing. It proves to be as tiresome and overly loud a
confrontation as the rest of them, and all too soon forgotten when
the lights in the theatre go on. In fact, though the action might
deliver some minor entertainment during the course of the movie, none
of it proves memorable, also due to the obvious levels of computer
generated imagery that never makes the invaders, be it the aliens
themselves or their vessels, feel convincingly real. What's worse, in
the heat of battle even the battleships feel overly pixelized at
times. The design of the extra-terrestrial aggressors is also lacking
originality, except for the silly beard like appendages on their face
which makes the threat and thus the film itself that much harder to
take seriously (if the platoon of old folks hadn't ruined it
completely yet). And when you take into consideration that their
motives for attacking humanity are never explained and clearly badly
executed, it's obvious Battleship is yet another pointless
addition to the plethora of lame alien invasion films that have
plagued moviegoers for the last few years. Being based on a much
beloved board game does not excuse studio executives to regurgitate
their recent failures.
The
original Battleship board game was a game of wits and skill,
but the resulting movie employs neither and appears to be nothing but
a haphazard attempt to out-Bay Michael Bay by applying his noisy and
irritating style of action to yet another Hasbro owned toy franchise
(as if the Transformers trilogy wasn't headache inducing
enough), undoubtedly also intended to sell more Hasbro products. The
latter might not be a bad suggestion, since saving the money for two
tickets for this film can buy you the board game instead, which is
guaranteed to make for more fun for two than watching the Battleship
movie could ever hope to achieve.
Oh well,
at least we still have The Avengers to remind us alien
invasion films can still be done right occasionally...
And
watch the trailer here:
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)







