Posts tonen met het label Sylvester Stallone. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Sylvester Stallone. Alle posts tonen

zaterdag 3 januari 2015

Today's News: 2015, first catch



Happy New Year everybody! Let's just pick off where we left off, I'd say. So here's the first few bits of news for 2015.

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/158505/blomkamp_onthult_concept_art_alien_film

This is some mouthwatering concept art. Clearly the product of someone who harbours great love for the Alien movies, especially the first (and finest) few installments. However, it's obvious this is more of a fanboy having a ball for his own pleasure than a workable first attempt at another Xenomorph infested film. It clearly has designs to directly follow Aliens, considering the presence of Michael Biehn (who ingloriously died in the first few minutes of its successor, Alien 3). The fact that the mythos has since been watered down by two more sequels, a prequel and two spin-offs, plus taking into account the age of both Biehn and Sigourney Weaver (not to mention the likely possibility both actors would not really be interested in doing another one), doesn't make for good chances of making a movie out of these doodles, no matter their fabulous look. A graphic novel of course is not an impossible option, so who knows what the future holds? Probably nothing in this regard, as Blomkamp has stated he did this mostly for fun and has since moved on working on real projects. Too bad, but maybe it's for the good. Let's face(hug) it: this imagery mostly hearkens back to the success of the first two films by applying iconic imagery and actors from those films. But applying them to what? No story is presented, nor even a medium in which it might otherwise be told. These images are completely empty of context, except for the love Blomkamp and us Alien fans bring to it ourselves. The first teaser for Star Wars: The Force Awakens comes to mind, which uses an all too similar tactic without delivering the necessary context of a narrative. At least in this Alien case, we'll never have to lament the fact that such great artistry was used for such a disappointing final product, which I continue to consider a very likely scenario for that upcoming Star Wars flick. Yet still, if there's ever gonna be another Alien movie (and I mean an Alien movie proper, not the upcoming Prometheus 2), Blomkamp would be my first choice for the directing chair.



http://www.moviescene.nl/p/158499/stallone_onthult_aankomende_films

As for directing, Sly Stallone is doing that in 2015. And acting. And writing and producing too. He sure is keeping himself busy. Too bad there's so little original projects involved, it's mostly him building on his past glories of Rocky and Rambo. At least with Creed, he's acknowledging his age by playing a mentor figure rather than an actual price fighter. Not so with the fifth Rambo movie, which is basically Stallone blowing off steam on camera and making money at the same time. To show he's keeping things up to date, this time he'll singlehandedly wipe out a whole Mexican drug cartel. If only that sort of thing would happen in the real world. The only one out of these three projects currently in the works that gets me the least bit excited is the one that seems to be most original. Then again, there's ample biopics about mobster bosses already, so it's hardly a unique concept. I doubt Scarpa could ever turn out as memorable as the likes of The Untouchables, Scarface or American Gangster. Doesn't really matter if it doesn't though. You just do your thing, Sly.


http://www.moviescene.nl/p/158507/cast_foto_serie_powers_onthuld

Also not a wholly original concept is a team of detectives investigating crimes that involve superpowered individuals. Remember The 4400 for example? Heck, even Agents of S.H.IE.L.D. often dabbles in that particular premise. Of course, the notion of setting it in a world where superhumans are a fairly everyday occurrence is more innovative, as is introducing an ex-superhuman as a cop character. That does make for some interesting novel story possibilites, and I hope Powers will utilize them to maximum effect. The cast sure helps, too. Casting Sharlto Copley is like striking gold, and I'm also happy to see Noah Taylor again. However, it's Michelle Forbes in a silly, sexy superheroine outfit that gets me most excited (in dual fashion, I must admit). The new TV division of the PlayStation Network seems to have a solid first show on their hands. Hopefully they didn't opt for this project simply because it's based on a comic book series about superpeople and those are currently hot. That sort of thinking is currently killing their mother company Sony's Spider-Man franchise, because they don't know how to proceed handling the character but because of his strong brand name they exploit him all the same. You need something more than just a popular character to win the audience over, preferably including a good story that keeps spectators hungry for more. Powers could have that in spades, and might very well deliver proof that there is still talent to be found amongst Sony's ranks where comic book adaptations and superhumans are involved. Or so we can only hope at this point.

woensdag 18 juni 2014

Today's News: scary posters and explosive trailers galore




Get ready for a nerdy newsflash:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156193/eerste_poster_dracula_untold

Looks atmospheric enough, particularly the international one (see above). That doesn't guarantee quality though, as plenty of B-movies know how to convey a Gothic mood without ensuring narrative fullfillment or an awarding viewing experience. Naturally this will never be even close to Universal's original horror classics of the Thirties and Fourties, but any movie at least paying hommage to those scores points with me. There's some good actors attached, while Luke 'Bard the Bowman' Evans surely isn't the worst choice for playing the notorious Vlad the Impaler. As for the 'Untold' aspect, it's basically an overt excuse to retell this tale that has been told countless times in countless shapes before. Doesn't matter really. There's certain ever fascinating fictional characters that are so firmly embedded in the human psyche they keep reappearing throughout time in hugely divergent guises to satiate the public's continuing love for them and spawn a meaningful reinterpretation that befits the current zeitgeist. Dracula is very much among those (while the likes of Tarzan, Sherlock Holmes and Godzilla are other noteworthy examples). I doubt there's very much truly novel material Dracula Untold will add to the overall history of the most beloved bloodsucker of them all. But that doesn't stop it from delivering a thrilling rollercoaster of a period horror film per se, if executed properly. And if it isn't, there's bound to be another incarnation that is in the long run, or we can revisit the classic takes on the character instead. No need to yell bloody murder if this one fails to serve us what its title implies.




http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156211/eerste_trailer_the_expendables_3

Now that's more like it. The teasers were positively teasing and hardly showed any of the signature action and witty oneliners we were hoping for. This trailer certainly remedies that previous omittance. This is one hardcore romperstomper of a preview that acknowledges the fact this will be the final Expendables flick (though when lots of cash is involved, you never know) and suggests we may at last be getting that 100 million dollar explosion or excessively epic gunfight-to-end-all-gunfights the previous two installments just didn't provide. A few more expert tough guy actors have been added to make sure stuff gets blown up even bigger and more grandiose than before. The more the merrier, but it's still the duo of Stallone & Statham we love the most, as they also insert something reminiscent of a plot line and emotional attachment into the film (honestly!). And even if that element proves forgetful, there's still plenty of action heroes, throwing knifes and blazing bullets to look forward to.




http://www.moviescene.nl/p/156212/eerste_trailer_penguins_of_madagascar

What is it with the tendency of sidekicks to be awarded their own features? Sure, they're cute and lovable, but they were always intended as characters to play off other, major characters. Plus, they tend to be overused for often cringeworthy purposes of comic relief. Occasionally they do work better by themselves - ultimate case in point: the Smurfs - but more often than not, their spin-offs prove bland fare that never stands up to the material they derived from. Who remembers the Ewoks features compared to Return of the Jedi? Nevertheless, now that most computer animation series have run their course and people start to get bored by them, studios hope to milk these properties by exploring glorified background characters. Puss in Boots is already moving on to his sequel, while next year will witness a Minions movie. And during the winter Holiday season, we'll have the Penguins of Madagascar to look forward too. I didn't think these paramilitary penguins particularly entertaining to begin with, but I was clearly in the minority there. I'm still not convinced after seeing this trailer, sorry. Maybe it also has to do with the fact I'm just fed up with animated talking animals entirely. And I've always found penguins to be overrated. They've been featured in films over the last decade so often now, they're becoming dull. Why not do a movie about Kiwis, or Cassuaries for a change? Now those are some weird birds deserving of animated acknowledgment!

zondag 12 januari 2014

Today's Mini-Review: Death Race 2000



Rating: ***/*****, or 7/10

Starring: Sylvester Stallone, David Carradine, Simone Griffeth
Directed by Paul Bartel
USA: New World Pictures, 1975

Ah, dystopian societies... If they're not engaged in brutalizing their own population, they're exploring new avenues of keeping the crowd in line by trite but true methods of 'panem et circenses', also guaranteeing their own existence is kept in check by ruling through that most potent combination of fear and wonder. Some form of gladiatorial event is ever a popular choice, appealing to the inhabitants of the totalitarian regime (or simply intimidating them) as well as to cinemagoers around the globe who cannot help but be mesmerized by the ruthless spectacle that ever delivers a paradoxical sense of blatant abjection and undeniable attraction. While these days the rage consists of teenagers battling each other to the death in fancy arenas, far more colourful and bizarre forms of contest have been portrayed at the movies in earlier decades. In 1975 Rollerball introduced spectators to the sport of the same name, an odd combination between hockey and boxing, that helped set new standards of onscreen violence. Capitalizing on the advance press publicity for this film, producer Roger Corman wasn't afraid to cannibalize the notion of 'blood sports' in order to produce an exploitation film making use of similar themes, thereby taking advantage of the media interest in the topic and subsequently beating Rollerball's theatrical release by a mere two months. And so a cult hit was born with Death Race 2000.


As the title successfully indicates, the premise of the movie revolves around a lethal race set in the then futuristic sounding year 2000. After the merger of the two major American political parties when the economy collapsed, a dictatorship runs the country and the titular contest is used to keep the populace satiated, bound to their television screens instead of giving them the opportunity to go out and start plotting the government's downfall. Contestants drive across the continent and win the race not only by driving faster than their opponents but also by the number of accidental bystanders they purposefully run down. Throwing out all morality, killing kids and old folk scores you more points than hitting people in their prime, as it's the utter depravity of the kill that determines the number of points awarded. To make matters even more interesting (and weird), each driver has a theme applied to their car, so we witness zany cars in Roman, Western and gangster style designs. Commentary on the race is given by the most obnoxious sportscasters imaginable to enhance the viewer's general sense of 'what-the'f**k'. The most popular participants of the 2000 race are Frankenstein (David Carradine, the world's most (in)famous autoerotic asphyxiation victim) and Machine Gun Joe Viterbo (a pre-Rocky Sylvester Stallone), both very able killer car drivers with little to no compunctions about hitting pedestrians hard. Frankenstein however finds himself caught in a ploy from a resistance movement to sabotage the race and assassinate the president, but he holds his private motives and political convictions (if any) as well. As the deplorable race progresses, Frankenstein must both survive his race rivals and outwit political insurgents who would abuse him as a puppet for their own shady agenda.


As you may have gathered, unlike Rollerball, Death Race 2000 has no pretensions of being a serious film, as it's more occupied with satirizing the social mores and the role of the media than with exploring the changing nature of violence in present day society; a major theme in the Seventies, as movies got increasingly more bloody and gory and actual violent incidents were allegedly inspired by such audiovisual fare, making society fear civilization was rapidly spiralling out of control. Though a fair amount of blood and gore (and nudity to top it off) is present in Death Race 2000, the movie mostly feels like a comedy and wants to do just that, making ample fun of people's projections of the future debasement of political standards and the mental deterioration caused by the media dumbing people down by pushing mindless drivel down their throats. It's easy to read social commentary in this film, even though Corman and the film's director Paul Bartel have no desire to come off as overly political, instead opting only to make a simple fun and ridiculous movie appealing to bored teenagers, appropriating themes and trends of the day just to ensure the movie makes more money than it cost (always a specialty of Corman's). Their intentions are adequately underscored by cheap production design, cheesy oneliners and completely over-the-top performances throughout the picture. With such ingredients and lack of willful message, it's no surprise Death Race 2000 became a smash cult hit, generating quite a profit from its obvious low budget (only around 300,000 bucks). A remake (and two sequels to that) starring Jason Statham would eventually follow, which traded in the good humour for a much grittier and convincing look and cars and stuntsto match that actually delivered the spectacle dystopian society already promised its audience three decades earlier.


zaterdag 21 december 2013

Today's Double News: to tease or not to tease



Trailer season continues, as indicated by these two news flashes I posted on MS the other day:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/152599/nieuwe_trailer_how_to_train_your_dragon_2

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/152562/eerste_teaser_expendables_3

These two short previews differ enormously in their approach to entice their respective audiences, as illustrated by what they show, or rather, don't show. The vid for The Expendables 3 is as clearly a teaser if ever I saw one, making no use of actual material of the movie proper and telling us nothing about the film's plot. It's sole purpose is to reveal to the public that the movie for which it teases is currently underway, for those who were not aware from online or magazine sources. By now the 'Expendables' brand is itself a perfect indicator for what's in store and the main question on everyone's mind - at least, everyone that is interested in this project - is not so much what to expect but more so who to expect. The teaser acts on this anticipation by bombarding the spectator with names (last names only, since otherwise it would get a little too cramped on the screen): this information will have to suffice for now. In fact, the names are of greater importance than the men visually assembled for our entertainment, since even on the big screen it's hard to recognize them all in a window of only a few seconds. Personally I think the teaser would have benefited from the first names too, to avoid confusion as to which actor will participate in cases where that could be in doubt. For instance, the 'Gibson' here is Mel, not Tyrese. Of course Mel is more wellknown anyway, but Tyrese too has compiled a big enough resumé in action movies over recent years to warrant a place in a movie of this type (maybe for a third sequel then). Rest assured: 'Powell' is not Colin, it's Glen (whom I have never heard of before). Overall, an effective teaser with a cast of names to match. I'm looking forward to the appearance of Ford and Grammer too.



Now, How to Train Your Dragon 2 is another animal entirely. In fact, I daresay it shows too much, instead of the opposite like The Expendables 3 does. Not surprising we get to see more of the story and characters in this preview, considering this film has already passed the teaser stage (and tease it did) and the current Holiday season is perfect for getting people enthusiastic about family films due for release in the next six months. But after seeing this trailer I get the feeling there's little more to the story that what is presented here. I for one would have saved the identity of the mysterious female dragon rider, as well as half of the grandiose dragon shots, for the movie itself rather than taking away such surprises. But then, I haven't even seen the first HtTYD, so what the heck do I know... That said, this preview will certainly succeed adequately in piqueing the target audience's interests, especially since in this franchise's case too popularity has already been established. I hear the first film was quite good, even though the trailers failed to excite me. Maybe the same thing will happen here, since I'm not convinced yet, despite getting the feeling I already know what the movie is about. When a trailer gives you that feeling, you know it hasn't done its job properly, but since this film is geared mostly towards kids, that's not a total loss.

maandag 27 augustus 2012

Shooting people up, Advanced Class


The Expendables 2: ***/*****, or 7/10

Tony Scott may have jumped off a bridge, thus leaving the movie industry with one less capable action director, but fortunately there's still some of those left. Simon West for example. Though generally not as well known, nor as experienced in shooting pure action judged from the number of action films in his repertoire, with movies like Con Air (1997), Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001) and the recent Jason Statham flick The Mechanic (2011), it's far from unreasonable to state the guy has some knowledge of things that go boom. So when Sylvester Stallone decided to stick to writing and acting while letting go of the director's chair that seemed to fit him well enough for his ultimate action movie The Expendables two years ago, hiring West for the job wasn't the most illogical decision. However, judging from the final product, Stallone would have done well to encourage West to get more innovative, considering The Expendables 2 improves little upon its predecessor: a solid action movie is West's contribution to the franchise, but considering the sheer number of renowned action stars participating in Stallone's second ode to the action genre as a whole, the sequel's approach to things feels like a routine is being established instead of new routes being taken. That routine apparently revolves around action stars getting together and shooting people up.


The movie's main focus seems to be the expansion of bit parts of characters from the first film played by screen icons Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bruce Wilis, plus the introduction of several new characters played by muscle movie veterans Jean-Claude Van Damme and Chuck Norris to the already impressive line-up of (near) legendary action stars from the first film, to further support Stallone's hypothesis that old dogs can still pull off worthwhile tricks that manage to draw huge audience numbers. His point was well proven by the success of The Expendables, making The Expendables 2 feel more like an obligatory Hollywood cash-in than a sincere attempt to outdo what was done before for the audience's entertainment. Nevertheless, The Expendables 2 at least succeeds in delivering ample amounts of gun fights and screen violence paired to often successfully timed moments of humor and referencing the action classics the movie means to pay homage to, which is what most spectators will expect, and what they will get.

The movie starts in medias res, as we follow Stallone's pack of mercenaries – and it's really Stallone's, since few people will ever remember the names of the characters after leaving their theaters, considering they are played by so many larger-than-life people – on a job rescuing a wealthy Chinese entrepreneur from the clutches of nameless Nepalese thugs, in a spectacular raid on their heavily fortified facility involving heavy machinery and man sized artillery, opening the film with a huge bang as our heroes shoot down and blow up endless rows of antagonists in an expected and desired orgy of gun violence, followed by an adrenaline rushed jungle river chase (which saw one stunt man dead and another one crippled) ending in a decently sized explosion to round things up. If you were wondering, the movie is rated R where the previous installment was only PG-13, thus allowing the director more freedom to insert appropriate levels of gore and blood into the film, all for the better. At this point the film has only run for about 15 of its 103 minutes, so it takes a moment to re-establish the characters, introduce some new ones and specify their upcoming mission, plus giving the viewers a much needed moment to catch their breath.


Centerpiece of the first half of The Expendables 2 is rookie team member Billy the Kid (played by Liam Hemsworth: despite his role in The Hunger Games, this is really his first action film, making him feel as much out of place in this movie judging from his experience as an actor as his character feels out of place on the team for his young age), protegée to team leader Barney Ross (Stallone, mumbling his lines as unintelligibly as usual), who despite his excellent sniper abilities decides this is not the life for him and tells his mentor he means to retire soon. However, when the band of extremely broad shouldered brothers find themselves with a new assignment, courtesy of shady CIA operative Church (Wilis), who they owe some money after the events of the first film, to retrieve a brief case from a downed plane in Albania, Billy's loyalty compels him to join them. They are also accompanied by Maggie, an expert on Church's payroll: Chinese actress Yu Nan gets the seemingly thankless job of representing girl power amidst the humongous amounts of testosterone going around, but manages to keep up surprisingly well, giving the occasional witty rebuttal when confronted with near sexist remarks from her new team members. The brief case is easily found, but soon lost to the villain of the piece, a bad guy simply named 'Jean Vilain', played enthusiastically by Jean-Claude Van Damme despite his character's feeble screen name: fully in tone with Stallone's straightforward way of thinking, why bother with intricate designations when you can call a spade a spade? Vilain makes it clear he's not to be messed with and lives up to his name when he takes the team's prize and leaves Billy dead, thus setting the stage for the veterans' quest for vengeance.

Revenge alone is too ignoble an objective for such a notable group of exemplary action stars, so the plot raises the stakes by revealing the brief case contained the exact location of a former Soviet depot in Bulgaria that houses five tons of plutonium Vilain intends to sell despite its threat to the world's balance of power. To make him even more of a ruthless bastard, he utilizes slave labor to dig out the plutonium, so the Expendables' mission is to free the slaves, secure the goods and avenge their comrade. In truth it matters little what the exact mission is, so long as the stage is set for a large string of overly loud gun fights, some neat display of martial arts and general fisticuffs and a decent amount of one-liners mixed in, most of them acknowledging the actors' former entries into the action genre (with the most obvious and funniest remarks referring to the Die Hard and Terminator franchises). In a moderately epic, drawn out conflict staged at an air port the team of good guys, now joined by Wilis, Norris and Schwarzenegger, square off against the legion of bad guys, culminating in a vicious mano-a-mano confrontation between Stallone and Van Damme, kicking each other's teeth in like two Roman gladiators. Needless to say who wins the day, since The Expendables 3 has already been widely announced.


In the middle of all the action, the main attractions of The Expendables 2 regrettably also turn out to be its main flaws. Since the success of the first movie was based mostly around the large number of famous action stars getting together for a mother-of-all-action-films flick, The Expendables 2 clearly needed to outdo its predecessor by gathering some more noted heavyweights to join the fun. The full line-up of action stars of the film now consists of Stallone, Van Damme, Wilis, Schwarzenegger, Norris, Dolph Lundgren, Jet Li, Jason Statham, Randy Couture and Terry Crews and with so many vets gracing the screen, it'll come as no surprise not everybody gets an equal chance to shine. Li, an established team member in the first film, exits the movie immediately after the opening mission has been completed, not to be seen or even mentioned again, while Couture, Crews and Norris are left with little to do during the whole piece, and Lundgren largely has been reduced to comic relief (which thankfully he pulls off well). It makes you wonder why the movie needed an action virgin like Hemsworth at all, considering his role could have gone to one of the older and more accomplished actors, thus offering a chance to make the narrative feel more poignant upon the moment of his death. The same can be said for Yu Nan's role (though it's laudable West and Stallone provided the opportunity for her big break on the international market), which could also have gone to one of the other actors in favor of balancing the existing amount of characters properly instead of relegating them to the side line in favor of even more characters joining the stage. Wilis and Schwarzenegger are no longer restricted to playing mere cameos as they were before but are finally offered the chance to get their hands dirty: they do so vigorously, but their status as (former?) A-list superstars is mostly applied to referencing their most memorable movies more often than feels appropriate, at times making their presence feel forced despite generating a few more laughs. At least Van Damme gets the opportunity to explore Vilain's savage villainy in much more detail, making his climactic final fight with Stallone work on the intended levels. As was the case with the predecessor, at the heart of The Expendables 2 still lies the camaraderie between Stallone and Statham, with the pair of them exchanging both witticisms and drama, acknowledging the fact the torch has successfully been passed from Stallone's age of action stars to Statham's more recent generation, with relentless love and understanding for the genre and its conventions clearly driving the both of them. The more things change, the more they stay the same after all, and both sides of the coin are amply represented in West's The Expendables 2 as much as they were in Stallone's own The Expendables.


The Expendables 2 is a double confirmation of the age gold adage that more of a good thing isn't necessarily better. First, it's good to see more familiar faces from past glory again, but if the talent we all know to be underlying said faces remains underused, little has been accomplished. The movie is running for an entertaining 103 minutes, but could have benefited from another 15 or 20 minutes fleshing out the likes of Norris, Couture, Crews, Li and Lundgren some more, especially considering that, second, like the first Expendables film, the movie still feels lacking something in the action department, even though that sounds incredible. Fact is, the first 15 minutes of the film basically say it all, showcasing the Expendables' efficiency as a team to great effect – with each team member getting the opportunity to display his fighting skills more or less equally – in an ever expanding rollercoaster ride of an action sequence, with a big explosion to tie it all up. The rest of the movie simply can't live up to this opening, despite throwing in more stars, more gags and more action, and even more plot (which makes you consider just how much, or how little, of that is needed in a film like this). Though it still entertains tremendously, the audience keeps waiting for a staggeringly huge motherfucking explosion that never comes.

Director West can't be blamed for his film's shortcomings, which simply lie in the movie's changing intentions as it finds itself transformed into a franchise trilogy – which it didn't start out to be – changing from paying homage to past glory, to a series of films revolving around ever greater numbers of action stars joining each other in referencing eachother's oeuvre as they dispatch large scores of bad guys. With The Expendables 3 already in the pipe line, Stallone would do well to take a closer look at the direction the franchise has taken and the effect this has had on both the audience's expectations and the overall coherence of the films proper, before signing on more colleagues the likes of Nicolas Cage and Steven Seagal to further relive the good ol' days. After all, the audience is not expendable, and it's still craving that giant stupendously big-ass explosion...


And watch the trailer here:

donderdag 1 maart 2012

Antz




Rating ****/*****, or 8/10


Delightful early computer animated movie about a lone ant, named Z, who lives in a huge ant colony and tries to get out of the oppressive life style he has endured all his life, while also falling in love with the colony's princess (voiced by Sharon Stone) which gets him on the radar of the society's military leader (performed by Gene Hackman) who is working on a genocidal reform plan to overthrow the colony and make it his. The voice role of the clumsy and neurotic but highly individualistic Z seems tailor made for Woody Allen, who delivers his performance with obvious pleasure. While the animation looks crude by today's standards, it seems appropriate for the film and does in no way detract from the film's enjoyable (though for a family oriented film, somewhat subversive) plot and a number of very funny, witty scenes and gags. It easily beat Pixar's insect film A Bug's Life, suspiciously released almost at the same time, on every level.


Starring: Woody Allen, Gene Hackman, Sharon Stone


Directed by Eric Darnell, Tim Johnson


USA: Dreamworks SKG, 1998