Great news this week for fans of
classic cinema and specifically for the Jurassic Park
community, of which I am a very very avid member: come July 2013, the
first Jurassic Park movie will finally return to theatres
worldwide! Fully recognizing its 20th anniversary (yes,
it's really been that long ago and we've all gotten really old),
Universal Pictures will re-release it in all its glory, bringing the
rampaging dinosaurs back to the silver screen for older generations
to fondly remember in an orgy of excessive nostalgia and for the
younger generation, which has remaind blatantly ignorant of its
awesome power in theatres, to finally re-discover in the way it looks
best, on the big screen. It seems the small scale re-release in the
UK (lucky bastards!) of late september was indeed, as many JP fans
speculated it was, meant to test the waters for a potential full
scale re-release around the globe. The waters apparently have been
deemed favourable enough, considering JP drew in respectable numbers
for a movie which only ran in a limited number of theatres and was
withheld a basic advertising and marketing campaign of any kind, so
the Brits only knew it was running in their local movie theatres if
they stumbled upon it, or if they'd been perceptive enough online to
know what cinematic gold they were bestowed upon by the studio
executive powers that be. But now the whole world will have a chance
to enjoy these animals again in all their glory of old...
...with one slight addition to the
whole...
…as it will be a much dreaded 3-D
re-release. People who know me will recall I'm not at all in favour
of post-converting movies in 3-D, especially if these movies are
decades old and were fully compelling to begin with and thus not in
need of any extra dimensions. However, in the current movie market,
re-releasing a classic without the added 3-D effect (and thus the
additional admission ticket costs, which studios and theatres crave
so much), is simply 'not done'. So we'll have to sit through JP
watching it with an extra dimension, and hope they did a good enough
job to make it look better, instead of worse. If we take the recent
example of Star Wars Episode I 3-D, it will likely be the
latter. That particular re-release was not improved by the 3-D
effects at all. In fact, the 3-D was hardly noticeable and severely
underwhelming considering all the ruckus with which Lucasfilm had
previously announced it. In the Netherlands, it flopped big time,
despite being Star Wars (because no matter how disappointing
the 3-D turned out to be, seeing Star Wars on the silver
screen again still was throughly enjoyable, even in the case of
Episode I). Jurassic Park will undoubtedly receive a similar
treatment, being a big franchise name which the studio will feel is
appealing enough for the general audience, so it won't have to pull
out all the stops to make the 3-D really worthwhile as spectators
will flock to their theatres anyway, or so the studio hopes. Unless
of course, studio executives got the message Star Wars Episode I
3-D delivered, namely re-releasing a big name franchise film with
lousy 3-D just won't be enough these days. Even though I hate to
compare JP to Episode I, it is the closest example.
Fortunately July 2013 is still a while
away, so Universal has ample time left to decide on a potent strategy
for making this re-release a success, and maybe even have their
effects magicians come up with excellently added 3-D effects after
all (though that seems less likely). Let's see how Titanic 3-D
does first next month. Maybe the Star Wars Episode I 3-D
incident will prove to have been just that, an incident, involving an
already much maligned film adorned with less than stellar 3-D
post-conversion.
For now, I'm thankful Jurassic Park
gets re-released at all (and I sincerely hope it reaches Dutch
theatres, since not all re-releases do). Even if the 3-D turns out to
be utter trash, it will be very hard to ruin this film, considered by
me as the grandest of all motion pictures, for me or my fellow JP
fanatics. After all, I haven't seen it in theatres for nearly 20
years... but fortunately Ian Malcolm turned out to be right: life
has, again, found a way!
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten