Posts tonen met het label super heroes. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label super heroes. Alle posts tonen
zaterdag 9 november 2013
Today's News: two powerhouses join forces for marvelous consequences
Quite the news flash was posted on MovieScene the other day, thanks to me:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/151502/marvel_en_netflix_bundelen_krachten
So basically, what Marvel did on the big screen is being redone on the small screen. Though the originality has worn off, giving several TV shows the same treatment, simultaneously setting up a larger universe that leads to a new (mini)series is quite a novelty, not to matter risky business. But hey, the same thigng was said about Netflix itself, so it comes as no surprise that particular "network" opted to engage in this joint venture. At the same time, Marvel is still cooperating with a regular television network (ABC) on the currently running Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and a new show which has still to be revealed (but is probably that Agent Carter show which was suggested earlier these past few months). So Marvel is branching out on all platforms, being visibly active in theaters, on home cinemas and online. It's gonna be hard to miss the company it seems.
But will these TV shows be compelling enough for audiences? I foresee a few potential obstacles. First, there is name recognition. Daredevil people may be aware of, most likely through the 2003 Ben Affleck movie, which isn't a good thing since it wasn't a very good movie. But how many people outside the world of comic book readers are familiar with Iron Fist, Jessica Jones and Luke Cage? Getting people to embrace these could prove quite a challenge, so hopefully that Marvel brand alone is enough to pull in an audience for their shows. Secondly, there's the background of the characters, which in all four cases is rather similar. All four series will take place in the New York neighbourhood of Hell's Kitchen, so instead of battling outlandish super villains these heroes will fight more basic everyday evil, like drugs, corruption, organized crime and such. What's more, in terms of powers these characters aren't all that different either. Though there are some noticeable unique abilities, they mostly feature superhuman strength, speed and reflexes. At least their origins are rather different, but otherwise four shows dealing with the same subject matter seems somewhat redundant. Of course, the final Defenders climax could herald the end of one or more of these shows to balance things out more neatly, but so far it remains to be seen just how far Marvel and Netflix plan to take these shows. Each character gets 13 episodes, after that we'll have to wait and see where they go from there.
Though story and power diversity may not be as strong, at least the characters are fairly different in make-up, which could appeal to a broader audience. You have your heroine to appeal to a female demographic, a black character and a character dabbling in Asian mysticism (but who's not actually Asian!) to get racial minorities interested and a blind guy to engage disabled folk (okay, that last one may be highly debatable, but you never know). In this regard, The Defenders would be far different from The Avengers, which is basically all white males. True, there's Black Widow as a female role model, but she still hasn't gotten a movie of her own, while Samuel L. Jackson's black Nick Fury is only a supporting character that isn't on the Avengers roster proper but mostly overseeing stuff and letting the white people do all the real work (kind of an reverse Black Pete, for Dutch people). The core members with their own films, Iron Man, Thor, Hulk and Captain America, are all white. Except for the Hulk occasionally, but there's no actual green people to be represented as far as I'm aware. In this light, the four Defenders can make quite a difference, even though they're otherwise not so different. Nice metaphor for humanity me thinks.
And if it doesn't work, Marvel can simply change the Defenders' roster and introduce new characters as they like. After all, the team went through quite a few iterations over the years, just like the Avengers did. As you can see on the picture above, none of the four Defenders you'll see on Netflix appeared in the original first issue. However, the Hulk did, so there's you first potential Defenders/Avengers crossover (even though using the Hulk as a character would probably be too expensive in terms of FX). And then there's the Sub-Mariner and Doctor Strange, both of which have been rumoured to get their own movies. Introducing them in these shows could be explained as testing the waters for a potential movie, or yet another TV series or miniseries. So many characters, so many possibilities and opportunities. One thing's for sure: whether on TV, in theaters or online, the future is gonna be marvelous.
donderdag 20 juni 2013
Today's News: first Lego Movie trailer assembled
Here's what I had to say about the new Lego Movie trailer at MovieScene:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/148012/eerste_trailer_the_lego_movie
It's a bizarre project, really. It's based on a hugely popular, iconic line of toys, but at the same time it joins together various other franchises that under normal circumstances (i.e., non-plastic) would never have gotten together. There's Batman and Wonder Woman, there's Raphael from the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, there's a historical Raphael, there's mermaids, astronauts and scores of other figures that are solely Lego's invention. You wonder how they pulled this one off in terms of copyright. Successfully it seems, though I wouldn't be surprised if this particular aspect of the film might bite them in the bottom down the road, especially if the movie becomes a smash hit (which is always the right time to start legal battles). After all, this film features so many DC comics characters (but no Marvel, even though Lego makes figures of that company's franchises too!) it might as well render the upcoming Justice League movie useless.
Will it be a success? I think it sure will, in terms of box-office at least. You got toys every kid in the world plays with (or should!) on an almost daily basis, in fact toys kids have been playing with for decades, so it's more easy for the kids to convince their parents to come along. Of course you can argue it's more fun to play with Lego than to watch someone else do it, but the same goes for football and there's a bigger number of people watching that than there is playing it. It's all in the brand name, and Lego is a big brand, well known and commonly appreciated. Much more so than Hasbro's Transformers and G.I. Joe action figures, which are more limited in terms of the demographics they appeal to, yet look at how well their films - unjustifiably - did. I wonder if Lego got the rights to its own movie... it would be odd to see Hasbro making its Lego ripoff KRE-O doing Lego Movie merchandise!
But does the trailer look good? I'm (moderately) pleasantly surprised by it. Yes, the story is derivative to the extreme, almost done to death in fact. Regular guy gets thrown in an epic quest to save the world along with a group of heroic characters that teach him the values in himself. Yawn. But this is done with Lego figures. In stop motion. And even in 3D. Waaaah... Okay, some of the shots in the trailer look a little crude, but hey, that's what Lego is. And it seems the jokes make up for it. In fact, I laughed a few times, which happens less and less in trailers I watch. It's clear the directors of the zany but wonderful animated flick Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs had a hand in building this world (pun intended of course; duh!). Their affinity and talent for odd situations and goofy gags, both visual and in dialogue, appealing to young and old alike, seems omnipresent. Hopefully the trailer for once is an accurate synopsis of the content of the actual film (though I would also like it if it is better than the trailer suggests). We'll have to wait until next year to find out, but hey, for nerds like me there's still various upcoming Lego Lord of the Rings, Hobbit and Star Wars sets to look forward to until then. Lego couldn't resist reminding my wallet of that fact. Shrewd maneuvring, Lego... at least the parents will know what to expect financially if they take their kids to see this film.
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/148012/eerste_trailer_the_lego_movie
It's a bizarre project, really. It's based on a hugely popular, iconic line of toys, but at the same time it joins together various other franchises that under normal circumstances (i.e., non-plastic) would never have gotten together. There's Batman and Wonder Woman, there's Raphael from the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, there's a historical Raphael, there's mermaids, astronauts and scores of other figures that are solely Lego's invention. You wonder how they pulled this one off in terms of copyright. Successfully it seems, though I wouldn't be surprised if this particular aspect of the film might bite them in the bottom down the road, especially if the movie becomes a smash hit (which is always the right time to start legal battles). After all, this film features so many DC comics characters (but no Marvel, even though Lego makes figures of that company's franchises too!) it might as well render the upcoming Justice League movie useless.
Will it be a success? I think it sure will, in terms of box-office at least. You got toys every kid in the world plays with (or should!) on an almost daily basis, in fact toys kids have been playing with for decades, so it's more easy for the kids to convince their parents to come along. Of course you can argue it's more fun to play with Lego than to watch someone else do it, but the same goes for football and there's a bigger number of people watching that than there is playing it. It's all in the brand name, and Lego is a big brand, well known and commonly appreciated. Much more so than Hasbro's Transformers and G.I. Joe action figures, which are more limited in terms of the demographics they appeal to, yet look at how well their films - unjustifiably - did. I wonder if Lego got the rights to its own movie... it would be odd to see Hasbro making its Lego ripoff KRE-O doing Lego Movie merchandise!
But does the trailer look good? I'm (moderately) pleasantly surprised by it. Yes, the story is derivative to the extreme, almost done to death in fact. Regular guy gets thrown in an epic quest to save the world along with a group of heroic characters that teach him the values in himself. Yawn. But this is done with Lego figures. In stop motion. And even in 3D. Waaaah... Okay, some of the shots in the trailer look a little crude, but hey, that's what Lego is. And it seems the jokes make up for it. In fact, I laughed a few times, which happens less and less in trailers I watch. It's clear the directors of the zany but wonderful animated flick Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs had a hand in building this world (pun intended of course; duh!). Their affinity and talent for odd situations and goofy gags, both visual and in dialogue, appealing to young and old alike, seems omnipresent. Hopefully the trailer for once is an accurate synopsis of the content of the actual film (though I would also like it if it is better than the trailer suggests). We'll have to wait until next year to find out, but hey, for nerds like me there's still various upcoming Lego Lord of the Rings, Hobbit and Star Wars sets to look forward to until then. Lego couldn't resist reminding my wallet of that fact. Shrewd maneuvring, Lego... at least the parents will know what to expect financially if they take their kids to see this film.
Labels:
batman,
DC,
lego,
lego movie,
moviescene,
super heroes,
toys
donderdag 4 april 2013
Today's News: Marvel's Phase 2 sneak peek
Here's a news flash for ya:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/145974/eerste_beelden_marvel_phase_2
As a comic book lover, I'm obviously very excited about these, though my enthusiasm for Guardians of the Galaxy remains restrained, considering I never really got into that cosmic stuff and none of these characters honestly appeal to me (especially Rocket Raccoon, which I think is just a lame JarJarBinksian concept). Plus, it just seems so out of whack with the rest of the current Marvel Cinematic Universe. It's good to see Marvel isn't afraid to explore other avenues from its 70+ years of comic books run than just the regular superhero stuff though, but I have yet to be convinced.
Thor: The Dark World looks pretty decent, as I expected it to be after Thor's first foray onto the big screen which turned out so well. Nice to know Natalie Portman is still onboard despite her near falling out with the studio over the departure of the original (female) director. Little vexation regarding Captain America: The Winter Soldier either, even though I understand this overly patriottic super soldier isn't everybody's cup of tea. I'm not all that high on the Falcon being a participant, though considering his long history with Cap (the pair shared a comic book series for a long time) his presence is far from surprising. His look is pretty slick (definitely Ultimate Universe inspired, which I can appreciate), but he remains a guy with metal wings on his back, which isn't a really fancy ability to say the last. Plus, his appearance in this particular Marvel movie might spell doom for an eventual (and quite often foretold) presence of the Vulture in a future Spider-Man movie. In the latter's case, again, not much of a loss for moviegoers.
Ant-Man: now that's something I look forward to! A tough nut to crack, considering his rather awkward powers: getting small, growing tall and communicating with ants. However, also a deeply flawed though brilliant personality (depending on which particular Ant-Man they will use, since there have been multiple over the years) with a plethora of human traits making him that much more identifiable. Wife beating, voyeurist activities, having people eaten by army ants: all in a day's work for the not quite so heroic Ant-Man! Coupled with capable, witty and stylistically intriguing director Edgar Wright (of Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and Scott Pilgrim v.s. the World fame), this might very well turn out to be the most delectable and off-beat character of the bunch. It could also suck bug balls big time of course, but let's keep a little optimism here, Wright certainly deserves it.
Make Mine Marvel Phase 2! Iron Man 3 gets to kick it off in three weeks, The Avengers 2 will finish it in a few more years (2015 probably).
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/145974/eerste_beelden_marvel_phase_2
As a comic book lover, I'm obviously very excited about these, though my enthusiasm for Guardians of the Galaxy remains restrained, considering I never really got into that cosmic stuff and none of these characters honestly appeal to me (especially Rocket Raccoon, which I think is just a lame JarJarBinksian concept). Plus, it just seems so out of whack with the rest of the current Marvel Cinematic Universe. It's good to see Marvel isn't afraid to explore other avenues from its 70+ years of comic books run than just the regular superhero stuff though, but I have yet to be convinced.
Thor: The Dark World looks pretty decent, as I expected it to be after Thor's first foray onto the big screen which turned out so well. Nice to know Natalie Portman is still onboard despite her near falling out with the studio over the departure of the original (female) director. Little vexation regarding Captain America: The Winter Soldier either, even though I understand this overly patriottic super soldier isn't everybody's cup of tea. I'm not all that high on the Falcon being a participant, though considering his long history with Cap (the pair shared a comic book series for a long time) his presence is far from surprising. His look is pretty slick (definitely Ultimate Universe inspired, which I can appreciate), but he remains a guy with metal wings on his back, which isn't a really fancy ability to say the last. Plus, his appearance in this particular Marvel movie might spell doom for an eventual (and quite often foretold) presence of the Vulture in a future Spider-Man movie. In the latter's case, again, not much of a loss for moviegoers.
Ant-Man: now that's something I look forward to! A tough nut to crack, considering his rather awkward powers: getting small, growing tall and communicating with ants. However, also a deeply flawed though brilliant personality (depending on which particular Ant-Man they will use, since there have been multiple over the years) with a plethora of human traits making him that much more identifiable. Wife beating, voyeurist activities, having people eaten by army ants: all in a day's work for the not quite so heroic Ant-Man! Coupled with capable, witty and stylistically intriguing director Edgar Wright (of Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and Scott Pilgrim v.s. the World fame), this might very well turn out to be the most delectable and off-beat character of the bunch. It could also suck bug balls big time of course, but let's keep a little optimism here, Wright certainly deserves it.
Make Mine Marvel Phase 2! Iron Man 3 gets to kick it off in three weeks, The Avengers 2 will finish it in a few more years (2015 probably).
maandag 16 april 2012
Captain America: The First Avenger
Rating:
****/*****, or 8/10
The last
of the single Avengers films, though ironically the 'Living
Legend' is the oldest Marvel comic book character of the bunch.
Applying a delicious comic-y retro visual style to the Second World
War and the introduction of the super soldier, the adventures of the
'First Avenger' resemble their drawn counterparts the most, making
for a very fun action film. Eager to sign up with the armed forces
during WW II, brave but physically feeble Steve Rogers (Chris Evans,
who previously played another Marvel character, the Human Torch, in
Fox's Fantastic Four) continues to be rejected for service.
However, his strength of will and general boldness eventually make
him a good candidate for a secret super soldier project, which turns
him into an almost superhuman character, physical and sensory
abilities all functioning at peak efficiency. Dubbed Captain America,
Steve is initially used only for propaganda performances, but after
pulling off a heroic rescue mission deemed near suicide, allied
command realizes he's of most use at the front lines, where he soon
gets on the radar of the Red Skull (another great villain on Hugo
Weaving's resumé), the leader
of a covert Nazi organization called Hydra, which dabbles both in the
scientific and the supernatural. Meanwhile, Steve also has a hard
time finding time for romance with feisty army dame Peggy Carter
(Hayley Atwell). If you overlook the blatantly patriotic American
overtones and you don't mind the fact Captain America's battles look
nothing like the actual WW II due to their use of near steam punk
levels of science (partially courtesy of the Thor influence,
continuing to successfully set up a larger, shared Marvel cinematic
universe) and the presence of the somewhat silly, overly politically
correct, ethnically diverse Howling Commandos (Wah-Hooo!), you're in
for one awesome rollercoaster of a semi-superhero action flick. Plus
impressive visual effects, including making a tall, muscular man look
short and skinny (yes, those were actually Chris Evans' real muscles,
but he never looked like that whimpy little guy).
Starring:
Chris Evans, Hugo Weaving, Hayley Atwell
Directed
by Joe Johnston
USA:
Paramount Pictures, 2011
woensdag 7 maart 2012
Superheroes without a movie
2012 will undoubtedly be branded as a(nother) great year for
superhero movies with The Avengers, The Amazing Spider-Man
and The Dark Knight Rises slinging into action on movie
screens in the upcoming months. However, none of these heroes are new
to the movies, as we've seen all of them in the cinema before.
Therefore, I thought I'd take the time to produce a short list of
superheroes (sort of, in some cases) that haven't been given a
theatrical exercise yet. Most of them we can't expect to ever see in
any audiovisual shape whatsoever, but their concept remains pretty
sweet regardless.
Moon Knight
Moon Knight could be described as Marvel's take on Batman, another
caped crusader, but more of a White Knight considering his colourless
outfit. The similarities are uncanny (rich guy fighting injustice
with his personal arsenal of gadgets and tailor made vehicles), but
so are the differences (he got his life calling thanks to an ancient
Egyptian god called Konshu, after living a violent life style as a
mercenary: in his Ultimate Universe incarnation he even possesses the
power of self-resurrection). His alter ego Marc Spector may not be as
appealing a playboy as Bruce Wayne, but he fights crime with a
vengeance at least as effectively as the Dark Knight thanks to his
prowess in the martial arts, in a team if necessary – he is a
reserve member of the Avengers – but preferably on his own so
nobody can bitch about his sometimes ruthless methods. As he once put
it himself:
'Someone has to do this. The
other guys, the world savers, they got their own jobs to do. A giant
monster pops out of the ground in the financial district? Call the
Fantastic Four. Magneto trying to wipe out the human race? X-Men on
the job. Invasion of alien vessels? That's what the Avengers are for.
That leaves this. Spidey? He's got his hands full with all of the
B-list super-villains. So someone has to do this. Someone has to do
the fun stuff.' Cue Mooney violently intervening in a
bloody gang fight, along with many many many rounds of gunfire and a
bunch of neat-o explosions. Such a level of gratuitous violence, plus
the distinct feel of copying Batman, is why we will probably never
see a Moon Knight movie.
The Darkness
The Darkness might not have made the list because calling him a
superhero is like calling Mongolian Death Worm the greatest
cinematic masterpiece of the 21st century (it isn't, you
know), but considering he's not fully evil and does occasionally save
lives, he's not a complete villain either. Call him an anti-hero if
you must. He certainly would himself. Jackie Estacado is raised in a
mob milieu by his crimelord uncle, so he's not the nicest guy around
anyway, but on his 21st birthday he turns out to be the
carrier of the ancient Darkness force, a sort of living weapon that
bonds to a singular human host and follows his commands only, with
the full intention of being an agent of evil. Jackie himself turns
out not to be totally beyond redemption and tries do keep his
humanity intact before the Darkness completely overwhelms him, using
his new power to protect the few people he loves, while on the run
from sinister religious societies, both those working for the Church
as the ones backing the opposition, who would use him for their own
shady purposes. It's a bizarre mess of religious nonsense and the
typical superhero conventions (which is the reason a movie for this
character is undoubtedly a no-go), but it works surprisingly well if
you can face this fantastic combination with an open mind. Plus, it's
supremely well drawn and provides some of the best artwork you'll
ever find in a single comic panel, even if it takes up a whole page.
Sub-Mariner
Namor, the Sub-Mariner, is an odd character. For one thing, he's half
human/half Atlantean, which makes him both aquatic and terrestrial.
For another, he's a mutant, probably one of the oldest around, equipped with two pairs of wings near his feet which enables him to fly. Above
all, he's the monarch of Atlantis, and anybody who wants to contest
his position is in for serious trouble, since he rules his realm
proudly and leaves little room for people questioning this fact.
Being one of Marvel's oldest characters (conceived in 1939), he has a
long and intricate history, sometimes being a villain – though
always with the right motives, usually protecting his kingdom from
mankind's destructiveness or saving the seas from blatant pollution –
but at least as often as a hero, fighting the Nazi's in WWII, or out
saving the planet or even the galaxy together with the Avengers or
the Fantastic Four, though it must be noted he has has plenty of
skirmishes with both teams. His hobbies include stealing married
women away from their husbands, most notably wooing Susan Richards
(the FF's Invisible Woman), much to the chagrin of the rest of her
family (she has a kid for crying out loud!). He's intelligent but
also overly arrogant because of his royal heritage, which makes him
such a fun character to read. However, he works best when playing off
other superhero characters, but because his copyright isn't clearly
established and might not lie with either the FF or the Avengers
franchises, chances of seeing this fish on the screen seem slim. However, rumors of a Sub-Mariner movie have been swirling around for years, so who knows... Hopefully they'll give his a less revealing suit, to avoid something silly like this:
Thunderbolts
One of the hardest things to do in superheroland is introducing a
team of superheroes, each character with his or her own backstories
and motivations, but distributed evenly enough over the whole plot to
make not one team member stand out too much over the others. X-Men
did this very well, though it focused increasingly heavily on
Wolverine at times. The Avengers was set up quite cleverly by
introducing each character separately, thus being able to jump right
into the action that causes the formation of the team in their own
movie. One team for which this would just be too hard to do is the
Thunderbolts, Marvel's most intriguing band of would-be wannabe
superheroes. Formed as a ruse, the original team consisted of super
villains who banded together to play superhero just long enough to
convince the world they were good guys so they could conquer it.
However, most team members were drawn to the status of genuine heroes
and revolted against the mastermind plan, opting to 'come out of the
closet' instead, after which they were allowed to be super heroes
under government supervision. Nowadays, the Thunderbolts team is the
Marvel Universe's prime super villain reform school. But of course,
old habits die hard, and plenty of characters have ulterior motives,
which set them at odds with the true super heroes (some of which they
fought in the past), their team mates and usually themselves at some
point. And this leads to some great story arcs and delicious
character development, as one should expect from such a wonderful and
original premise. But a Thunderbolts movie will never happen, since
there's just too many characters, none of which - of the original team at least, though later incarnations featured several characters used in recent Marvel movies, including the Green Goblin, Venom, Bullseye and Deathstrike - have been featured in
a Marvel movie so far so the general audience isn't really aware of these names, though in the comics all of them have had run-ins with well known superheroes
before. Few people not 'in-the-know' with comic books will have heard of baddies Baron Zemo, Beetle or Moonstone. If each upcoming Marvel movie featured one of
the Thunderbolts' super villains, in the long run this might pay off
(though when they were villains, few Thunderbolts were
ever really interesting characters). Copyright is also an issue here, since the Thunderbolts' respective histories are interconnected with a plethora of Marvel heroes' lives, the movie rights to which lie scattered among many different studios. For now we have to wait and see whether
introducing each Avenger separately before releasing their first
group effort actually pays off before we can dream of another Marvel movie project that deals with setting up characters by themselves before having them join forces. But the question remains, would the average movie-goer want to see a film about a team of virtual no-name ex-scumbags on a quest to clear their names? I would of course...
Dark Claw
If you think this superhero looks suspiciously familiar, you're
right. This is the best character to come out of the Amalgam
Universe, a separate comic realm which consists solely of characters
comprised of various figures from the Marvel and DC Universes. It's
obvious which two characters make up the bones of Dark Claw. His back
story is a mix of both their histories: as a boy, Logan watched his
parents gunned down in front of him. Later in life, he joined the
military and got drafted into a top secret project in which an
adamantium skeleton and claws were surgically grafted into his body.
Afterwards, he decided to use his new strength to secretly fight
crime in Gotham City, with his former friend and co-test subject
Victor Creed becoming his arch enemy Hyena, a giggling maniac with a
beastly appearance, animal senses and big nasty pointy claws. Sounds
too familiar in some respects to general audiences who would
ignorantly call it a rip-off, plus the rights lie with two different
companies who are currently trying to top each other with their big
epic super hero projects in movie theatres (with Marvel winning
easily). So this is one cool character that will never see the light
of day on film. And since the Amalgam Universe was short-lived, his
time of fighting crime at night is also long past. A damn shame... Hyena alone would have made it worthwhile to watch.
So whenever you think there's too many superhero movies being made, remember that for each superhero that gets a film, there's a dozens others that remain sadly forgotten. And whenever you think there's not enough superhero movies being made (like I do), just remember how awesome (most of) the movies we do get are. And go and read more comic books, that certainly helps too.
zaterdag 4 februari 2012
Spider-Man 3
Rating: **/*****, or 5/10
Overdaad
schaadt het webhoofd
Tot
zover ging het goed: Sam Raimi regisseerde in 2002 het uitstekende
Spider-Man, een film die wereldwijd kassa's kraakte en een
drijvende kracht was in de herwonnen populariteit van de
superheldenfilm. Vervolgens herhaalde hij het kunstje met het al even
sterke Spider-Man 2 die het zo mogelijk nog beter deed en
Raimi's status als topregisseur in Hollywood bevestigde. Raimi kan nu
dus doen en laten wat hij wil, wat in het geval van het nieuwste deel
in de reeks, Spider-Man 3, niet positief uitpakt. Hij besloot
zich als schrijver op te stellen, terwijl dat bij de vorige delen aan
meer ervaren scriptschrijvers werd uitbesteed. En het script is nou
juist het grootste probleem van Spider-Man 3: het laat ernstig
te wensen over.
Spider-Man
3 pakt de draad op waar Spider-Man 2 eindigde, en vervolgt
de plotlijnen die in de voorganger achtergelaten werden. Peter Parker
(als vanouds Tobey Maguire, die uitstekend een nerd kan spelen, maar
een minder geslaagde Spidey neerzet) heeft zijn geheime identiteit
onthuld aan het meisje van zijn dromen, Mary Jane (de nog steeds vrij
irritante Kirsten Dunst). Het gaat hem nu eindelijk voor de wind,
omdat hij de balans tussen zijn eigen leven en dat van zijn alter ego
heeft weten te vinden en Spider-Man bovendien steeds populairder
wordt, ondanks de aanhoudende pesterijen van krantenbaas Jameson (de
nog immer schmierende J.K. Simmons die tot komische noot van de
eerste orde is gereduceerd). Peter meent dat het tijd wordt Mary Jane
ten huwelijk te vragen, maar is zo druk met het voor superheld spelen
dat hij niet doorheeft dat zijn vriendin een ernstige dip in haar
carrière doormaakt en Spidey's roem met lede ogen aanziet. Bovendien
heeft hij het nog niet kunnen uitpraten met zijn beste vriend Harry
Osborn (een overtuigend getergde James Franco) die hem verdenkt van
de dood van diens vader, zich nu ook bewust van Peters geheime
identiteit. Met het wapenarsenaal van zijn papa, superschurk Green
Goblin, zint Harry op wraak.
Er
speelt dus al genoeg om zowel Peter als Spider-Man twee uur bezig te
houden, maar blijkbaar vond Raimi het niet voldoende het hier bij te
laten. Daarom komt hij nu op de proppen met maar liefst twee nieuwe
superschurken, beide met hun eigen persoonlijke relaties jegens Peter
Parker. (Waarom elke booswicht zowel een band met Peter als met
Spidey moet hebben is onduidelijk, aangezien dat in de comics
nooit nodig was.) Ten eerste is er Sandman (een ruige maar
eigenlijk goedhartige en wanhopige Thomas Haden Church), een
ontsnapte crimineel die bij een wetenschappelijk experiment per
ongeluk getransformeerd wordt in een uit zand bestaand en daardoor
ongrijpbaar wezen. Het blijkt dat hij verantwoordelijk was voor de
dood van Peters oom, waardoor Spider-Man, gedreven door wraakzucht,
geobsedeerd wordt hem uit te schakelen. Ten tweede voert de film een
buitenaardse klomp slijm op die een symbiotische relatie met Peter
aangaat, wat Spider-Man extra kracht geeft, maar Peter vervreemdt van
zijn naasten. In een poging zich van het creatuur te ontdoen bindt
het zich aan een fotograaf (een compleet verkeerd gekozen Topher
Grace) die vervalste compromitterende foto's van het webhoofd maakte
maar door Peter ontmaskerd werd, wat het monster Venom oplevert, dat
Spider-Man bruut wil vermoorden.
Zoveel
plotlijnen in slechts 133 minuten, dat kon gewoon niet goed gaan...
en ondanks Raimi's kundige regie in de voorgaande delen slaat hij
hier de plank volledig mis, waardoor het een warboel vanjewelste
wordt. Terwijl hij erin slaagt de geschiedenis van de nieuwe
superschurken en hun verhoudingen tegenover ons aller favoriete
muurkruiper begrijpbaar genoeg uit de doeken te doen, toont de film
zijn zwakte vooral in het melodrama tussen Peter en Mary Jane,
waarbij Harry en nieuwe meid Gwen (Bryce Dallas Howard) toegevoegd
worden om een vierhoeksrelatie te vormen die nooit echt emotioneel
meelevend wordt en meer irritatie dan intrigerende
karakterontwikkeling oplevert. Bovendien haalt het relationeel
gezwets dikwijls flink de vaart uit de film, aangezien de
actiescènes, hoe gelikt en visueel prikkelend ook, nogal sporadisch
over de film verdeeld zijn.
Nog
storender is de humor, of beter gezegd, de poging tot humor. Waar
Raimi zowel Spider-Man als Spider-Man 2 overgoot met
een liefdevol, dun sausje humor, wordt Spider-Man 3 er bij
vlagen in gedoopt, doordrenkt en uitgeperst, wat niet alleen
overdadig uitgesponnen flauwe grappen oplevert, maar ook de ernst van
de problemen tussen Peter en zijn vrienden bagatelliseert en sterk
contrasteert met enkele tragische scènes die de film bevat. Het
dieptepunt vormen de scènes waarin Peter, onder invloed van de
buitenaardse symbiont tot stereotypische 'emo' verworden, zijn
vrienden teistert en tussendoor op straat danst wijzend naar alle
leuke meisjes die langslopen. En dat minutenlang. Het had misschien
een paar seconden grappig kunnen zijn, nu is het slechts pijnlijk
beschamend, maar kennelijk dacht Raimi daar anders over.
Gelukkig
weet Raimi nog wel overtuigende actiescènes neer te kunnen zetten.
Ze zijn minder voorhanden dan de lengte van de film doet vermoeden,
en vooral in het midden van Spider-Man 3 dringt de vraag zich
op waar ze toch blijven, maar wanneer ze eenmaal losbarsten doen ze
dat ook goed en blijkt Raimi's talent ze dynamisch en enerverend te
kunnen leveren. Als één van de duurste films ooit gemaakt is het
niet verwonderlijk dat de (digitale) trukendoos hier wagenwijd open
is gezet, wat prima spektakel oplevert dat tenminste tijdelijk de
vele gebreken van Spider-Man 3 weet te compenseren. De lange
eindstrijd, waarin Spidey en Harry op epische wijze de booswichten
bevechten, vormt een heerlijke kers op een verder nogal bedorven
taart.
Aan
alle goede dingen komt een einde, is de eerste gedachte bij het zien
van Spider-Man 3. Hoewel de film gemaakt is met grotendeels
dezelfde spelers, zowel voor als achter de camera, wordt de kwaliteit
van de uitstekende eerste twee delen niet gehaald. Dat is extra
jammer als men bedenkt dat regisseur Sam Raimi tot zover een speelse
stijl hanteerde die sterk deed denken aan de luchtige stijl die ook
de comics kenmerkte, maar die hier steeds te ver wordt
doorgevoerd en zodoende geen doel treft. Het resulteert in een
overdaad aan romantisch melodrama dat flink de vaart uit de film
haalt, flauwe grappen die totaal niet passen in de bij vlagen
ernstige toon van het verhaal, en een rommelig geheel van plotlijnen
omtrent het trio schurken dat wordt opgevoerd om de webslinger het
leven zuur te maken. Er is domweg teveel aan de hand in Spider-Man
3, het zit elkaar maar in de weg waardoor weinig geslaagd uit de
verf komt. Meer is in dit geval absoluut minder.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)














