Posts tonen met het label Iron Man. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Iron Man. Alle posts tonen
maandag 16 februari 2015
Today's Column: will Spider-Man be our new Iron Man?
Told you I'd write that column? Well, here it is:
Wordt Spider-Man de nieuwe Iron Man?
What, another column in only two weeks, you may ask? Well, I had the time available to pen one and there was an opening because the guy who was supposed to deliver one this week didn't do so (for shame!). Plus, my editor recognized this as a current topic that needed to be posted before the news felt too far in the past. So, good for me.
As you might be able to discern from this overly long piece, I don't believe Spider-Man joining the ranks of Marvel Studios is a bad thing at all. I just know there's a lot of factors to take into account to make it work properly, without getting the feeling the webhead is hogging all the glory from his fellow superheroes (something Robert Downey Jr's Iron Man felt to be doing at times). And I have faith that Marvel will consider all possible angles, while my gut tells me they had it all worked out already, as they're champions in planning their universe thoroughly ahead. That said, I do believe re-introducing the audience to the beloved webslinger in the next Captain America movie is not the smartest move. It feels too much like 'oh, Spider-Man played a pivotal role in the Civil War comics, so let's use him in that screen adaptation to stick closer to the source material and earn points with the fan base' or a similar thought along that line. But this is not necessarily the Spider-Man we've come to know. It won't be Andrew Garfield. It's a new guy, which - unfortunately - does require a bit of an origin story to make it flow seamlessly. And such a story is better suited in his own film, rather than in somebody else's. Even though I recognize audiences have grown tired of Spidey's origin story, which has been retold a little too often in recent years. But you still gotta have it if you're talking about a new Spider-Man. A younger Spider-Man. Might they even consider going a vastly different route and eliminating Peter Parker for the new webhead on the block Miles Morales altogether? Now that's an interesting thought. Though definitely one that would polarize the fan community and make for quite some heavy flame wars all over the web. Whose side are you on? That's inspiration for another column right there.
zondag 12 oktober 2014
Today's News: still behind schedule
It's gonna take me a while longer to get back on track in regard to commenting on the bits of news I posted. As usual, time is against me:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/157503/nieuwe_character_posters_hobbit_3
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/157522/meer_characters_posters_hobbit_3
Wow, those are some bland posters. Just the faces of some of the protagonists, that's all we have to work with. Rather disappointing, as this is the last Hobbit movie, if not the final Middle-Earth movie (ever?), so you would think they'd go out with as much of a bang as the movie itself (though I may be assuming a little too much here, I doubt this trilogy will end on a boring note). We already know what the characters look like, so we would have liked to have seen a bit more of the environment they inhabit. A grand and elaborate banner (think the Bayeux Tapestry, but its Tolkien equivalent) was released last month that did a far better job of promoting the movie, capturing our imagination and firing our desire to see this film than this dull posters would ever do. The advertising art for both predecessors too looked much more appealing by comparison. Guess the promotional execs think it's all a matter of the little things. Assumptions from the characters' facial expressions are all we are left with, which is a pointless guessing game for those who have read the book. Why does Gandalf look so disheveled? What's up with Galadriel's determined gaze? And is Bilbo finally going to go berserk with that little sword of his? We'll have to watch the movie to find out. But then, we were planning to do so anyway, and these posters at the very least won't discourage us from doing so.
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/157443/eerste_teaser_pixars_inside_out
Finally, a new Pixar movie that's not a sequel! I'm not entirely sold on the concept though. It's intriguing, but hardly novel. However, Pixar usually tends to make such outlandish premises work just fine, and I'm hoping post-Brave Pixar won't do any different. You won't get any clear indication of the story just from watching this teaser, which only hints at the overall story (not that much info on that has been released so far, anyway). Not to mention it does a solid but sentimental job referencing all the Pixar greats - and some less great, too - we remember oh so fondly. This teaser is playing mostly on the past emotions of pleasure we experienced watching all the company's classics, as well as stimulating a strong emotion not characterized in the film: curiosity. But there's also plenty of room left for doubt, make no mistake. Which begs the issue, how come there's only five emotions in the girl's head? What happened to the rest of them? A philosophical debate about the nature of emotions and the way they rule our mind seems to be in short order. Though it's likely Pixar still has some surprises left on Inside Out's plot and the questions this teaser throws in our path about the logic of it all.
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/157465/logo_daredevil_serie_onthuld
Well, at least they got the logo right. That's straight off the comic books' covers, that is. Though the usual subtitle 'The Man Without Fear' is absent, but this works equally well. A return to the comics' greatness (on-again/off-again, honestly) is sure in order after the Ben Affleck version, which showed little of that. Currently, New York Comic-Con is in full swing and so far the Daredevil panel was by far the most fascinating occurrence. The concept art looked pretty neat, the first released pictures gave some pretty sweet glimpses, except maybe for the titular character's costume. Though I have a sense it's not the final piece, but more like Daredevil's initial stab at a costume (á la Spider-Man's ludicrous wrestling attire in Sam Raimi's first movie). It would be a bit of a downer if this series' superhero ran around with a black handkerchief for a mask for the whole show. I guess Marvel has to find ways to cut the budget somewhere...
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/157499/toch_een_iron_man_4
And one reason the studio has to do just that involves the exorbitant pay cheques demanded by its star performers these days. Robert Downey Jr. is by far the most expensive of the lot of them, as his salary for Iron Man 3 amounted to no less than 50 million (!) dollars, reportedly. So small wonder Marvel is looking for way to dodge such excessive costs on future projects. One way to get rid of Downey Jr. would be to quit making Iron Man films. The man is still contractually obliged to assume the character's mantle for two more Avengers flicks, but they could end it there by using those films to find a narrative way to replace him with another character to fill his iron shoes. It's not like that sort of thing isn't constantly happening in the source material. Remember Thor is currently a female in the comics? Which would only entice audiences more strongly to find out what the heck is going on. Of course, that would mean spectators will have to get used to an Iron Man without Tony Stark (no way they are gonna recast that character, considering how beloved Downey Jr.'s take on him is). I have no qualms with that. The Marvel Universe is so much larger than just one popular guy, and the movies have still barely scratched the surface. I'm all for a new Iron Character if it saves Marvel from bankruptcy so they can keep on making highly enjoyable superhero movies. I doubt we're going to see an Iron Man 4 with Robert Downey Jr. in the starring role again (and he himself apparently doubts it very much as well, considering his conflicted reponses to the 50 million dollar question), and if that be the case, I don't mind. There's various ways to deal with that in compelling storytelling (in fact, the matter has already been explored in both Iron Man 2 and 3), and I have confidence that the House of Ideas will pull it off once more. Iron Woman sounds like a wonderful notion, so bring it on!
woensdag 30 oktober 2013
Today's News: will the real Mandarin please stand up?
Remember the MovieScene news I posted here earlier about that secret Marvel project Sir Ben Kingsley was working on? You better, since I only posted it last week. Seems the beans have been spilled over this one earlier than anticipated, as it has now become apparent what exactly the project involves:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/151265/ben_kingsleys_marvel-project_onthuld
Way to respond to controversy, Marvel. You finally realized you screwed up a classic bad guy - something the fans had to tell you themselves - so now you feel like making amends. Too late, the damage has been done: Iron Man 3 was a hugely disappointing movie. You could have saved face if you had attached this one-shot as an epilogue to that film, instead of making it available on the BD-release of an upcoming Marvel flick (which will then also be soured by this heavily polarizing topic). Now it just appears as if you are capitalizing on the misery of your loyal followers by offering them an alternative to your own failure. Nevertheless, I am gratified Iron Man 3 wasn't the end for the Mandarin, since it never even included a proper beginning for this powerful and popular member of the Golden Avenger's rogue gallery. It was a farce, plain and simple. And maybe, jusy maybe from the ashes of this farce a new villain shall rise to claim his revenge (which might include killing Ben Kingsley's character, which would be fine by me). Considering the number of equally ticked-off Marvelites that want their Mandarin hot and bothered, this sort of conflict marketing might work in the studio's favour in the longer run. But for now, it seems like a clear sell-out to please as many people as possible.
But who will play the genuine Mandarin article? It could be Ben Kingsley himself, which would both be ironic and repugnant, considering the complete waste of his talents involved in his previous excursion into the Marvel Cinematic Universe which would continually be brought to mind. Another grand actor seems more likely. Perhaps even an actual Chinaman. Though if he must be of oriental origine, the studio will no doubt turn to Ken Watanabe as he's the go-to-Asian for Hollywood. It matters not, as long as this fake Mandarin will soon be forgotten. Who cares about actual incorrect social and racial casting if fictional characters' legacies are harmed?
zaterdag 27 juli 2013
Today's Mini-Reviews: downfall of the rich and powerful
Iron
Man 3: **/*****, or 5/10
Most
disappointing of the Marvel Studios movies so far. Shane Black (Kiss
Kiss Bang Bang) took over the director's chair from Jon Favreau
who did the first two installments. Maybe it's Black's tendency to go
over the top a bit too far, maybe the writers and producers just got
terribly lazy in the creative process after the sucess of the
predecessors, but Iron Man 3 proves a dud. Tony Stark finally
has found a decent equilibrium between his eccentric playboy life and
his public role as the armored superhero Iron Man, but soon his world
is turned upside down after he deliberately picks a fight with the
vicious terrorist leader Mandarin (“played by Sir Ben Kingsley”) who
wounded his former bodyguard Happy (still performed by Favreau himself at
least). The Mandarin comes down hard on Tony, destroying his mansion
and seemingly obliterating his various armors. With only his wit, his
engineering skills, his insufferable character flaws – he was never
more irritating than he is here – and the aid of some kid in a
shack, he soon turns the tables and confronts his new nemesis and his
silly army of exploding people, only to find out the situation is not
what it appeared to be, as the Mandarin is just a fraud (way to ruin
a classic bad guy, Marvel!). Another adversary, A.I.M. leader
Aldrich Killian (Guy Pearce) is behind it all, out to revenge himself
on Stark, literally for making him cry ten years earlier (now that's
what I call a solid motivation for aiming to conquer the world!).
During the film's climactic showdown, Tony can fortunately count on
his girlfriend Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) to save his ass, plus
he had another 40 armors inexplicably hidden up his sleeve. Iron
Man 3 pretentiously delves into semi-philosophical territory when
it keeps asking whether the suit makes the man or vice versa, but the
fact is we simply don't care. All we knew was that Robert Downey Jr.
made Iron Man and now sloppy writing has allowed him to be unmade,
for which Downey reportedly received the sum of 50 million (!)
dollars, probably for looking the other way as it happened. At least Stark is basically still the same after four films,
as it was clear what audiences wanted and expected from the get-go.
The same can't be said for the Mandarin, whose presence was alluded
to in the prevous two Iron Man films, but all of a sudden
proves to be someone else entirely halfway through the film. Don't trust the trailers for this
film that insinuated that we were in for a major epic villain played
by Kingsley, since that's all a lie and you'll end up disappointed. Blame it on the Chinese
involvement, as Iron Man 3 was co-produced with Chinese
studios to cut costs (Downey's salary had to come from somewhere
after all). And in such a case, you simply can't afford to have a
Chinese villain claiming to be after the destruction of western
civilization. Interestingly enough, the Chinese market received a
slightly different cut of the film including scenes not seen in the
regular version, to make it even more attractive for Chinese
audiences. Iron Man 3 bodes ill for the rest of Marvel's Phase
2, but there's gotta be better upcoming movies to make up for this
huge letdown. Ant-Man maybe?
The
Great Gatsby: ***/*****, or 7/10
Another
visual feast by Baz Lurhmann (Moulin Rouge, Australia).
The fifth version of the classic book by F. Scott Fitzgerald, and
definitely the most extravagant, as we would have expected from
Luhrmann, who always tends to lavishly overstylize his films. This is
his first foray into the realm of 3D, and fortunately it's a
successful one at that. From a narrative viewpoint, the movie
predictably feels less intriguing. In the early Roaring Twenties, war
veteran Nick Carraway (a rather dull Tobey Maguire, as is the norm)
moves to Long Island, next door to a giant mansion belonging to the
seemingly incredibly wealthy but enigmatic Jay Gatsby (Leonardo
DiCaprio, another one of his hugely rich and influential but
emotionally tormented big screen souls). Drawn to the unreal world of
fabulous upperclass decadence, Carraway soon gets his taste of high
society as he attends one of Gatsby's unbelievably amazing parties.
Gatsby soon purposefully reveals himself to Nick and recruits him to
arrange a meeting between himself and Nick's attractive cousin Daisy
(Carey Mulligan), a long lost love of Gatsby from before the Great
War whom he lost contact with and who has since gone on to marry a
rich but quite dislikeable land owner (Joel Edgerton). Hoping to
respark their love thanks to Nick's involvement bridging their past,
Gatsby and Daisy soon reunite and haphazardly start an affair that
can only end in tragedy. But despite his attempts to basically bang a
married girl, you hope Gatsby succeeds as he is a sympathetic
character, once a boy who came from nothing but worked himself up to
incredulous heights, while still favoring the lower class folks who
live decent lives worth living, instead of engaging in the monotony
of endless partying. Gatsby appears to make a stand for the poor,
hard working labourers with his understanding attitude and actions,
which can only lead to his downfall from the rich ruling classes and
their corrupting power over everything and everyone. But what a
downfall it is, shot with such dynamic vibrancy and wild colour
schemes, presented in three jaw-droppingly beautiful dimensions!
Nevertheless the blatant melodrama at the core is hard to be
effectively sugarcoated, even in Luhrmann's elaborate ways. The
Great Gatsby emulates its titular character, in the sense that
it's packed with bombastic bravoura and laced with visual flair
throughout, detracting you from the lack of a refined, satisfactory
plot, which is notably absent if you care to see beneath the mask of
its sensational appearance. Beneath the surface it's all fairly
hollow, but not without a certain charm. This movie is a feast to
behold as much as the parties it depicts would no doubt be a thrill
to attend, but ultimately, it proves a fairly forgetful experience in
the long run. And so Hollywood can keep remaking Fitzgerald's novel
once every few decades to ever more spectacular results.
Labels:
baz lurhmann,
gwyneth paltrow,
Iron Man,
iron man 3,
leonardo dicaprio,
Marvel,
parties,
roaring twenties,
Robert Downey Jr.,
shane black,
superhero movie,
superheroes,
terrorism,
the great gatsby,
Tobey Maguire
donderdag 4 april 2013
Today's News: Marvel's Phase 2 sneak peek
Here's a news flash for ya:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/145974/eerste_beelden_marvel_phase_2
As a comic book lover, I'm obviously very excited about these, though my enthusiasm for Guardians of the Galaxy remains restrained, considering I never really got into that cosmic stuff and none of these characters honestly appeal to me (especially Rocket Raccoon, which I think is just a lame JarJarBinksian concept). Plus, it just seems so out of whack with the rest of the current Marvel Cinematic Universe. It's good to see Marvel isn't afraid to explore other avenues from its 70+ years of comic books run than just the regular superhero stuff though, but I have yet to be convinced.
Thor: The Dark World looks pretty decent, as I expected it to be after Thor's first foray onto the big screen which turned out so well. Nice to know Natalie Portman is still onboard despite her near falling out with the studio over the departure of the original (female) director. Little vexation regarding Captain America: The Winter Soldier either, even though I understand this overly patriottic super soldier isn't everybody's cup of tea. I'm not all that high on the Falcon being a participant, though considering his long history with Cap (the pair shared a comic book series for a long time) his presence is far from surprising. His look is pretty slick (definitely Ultimate Universe inspired, which I can appreciate), but he remains a guy with metal wings on his back, which isn't a really fancy ability to say the last. Plus, his appearance in this particular Marvel movie might spell doom for an eventual (and quite often foretold) presence of the Vulture in a future Spider-Man movie. In the latter's case, again, not much of a loss for moviegoers.
Ant-Man: now that's something I look forward to! A tough nut to crack, considering his rather awkward powers: getting small, growing tall and communicating with ants. However, also a deeply flawed though brilliant personality (depending on which particular Ant-Man they will use, since there have been multiple over the years) with a plethora of human traits making him that much more identifiable. Wife beating, voyeurist activities, having people eaten by army ants: all in a day's work for the not quite so heroic Ant-Man! Coupled with capable, witty and stylistically intriguing director Edgar Wright (of Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and Scott Pilgrim v.s. the World fame), this might very well turn out to be the most delectable and off-beat character of the bunch. It could also suck bug balls big time of course, but let's keep a little optimism here, Wright certainly deserves it.
Make Mine Marvel Phase 2! Iron Man 3 gets to kick it off in three weeks, The Avengers 2 will finish it in a few more years (2015 probably).
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/145974/eerste_beelden_marvel_phase_2
As a comic book lover, I'm obviously very excited about these, though my enthusiasm for Guardians of the Galaxy remains restrained, considering I never really got into that cosmic stuff and none of these characters honestly appeal to me (especially Rocket Raccoon, which I think is just a lame JarJarBinksian concept). Plus, it just seems so out of whack with the rest of the current Marvel Cinematic Universe. It's good to see Marvel isn't afraid to explore other avenues from its 70+ years of comic books run than just the regular superhero stuff though, but I have yet to be convinced.
Thor: The Dark World looks pretty decent, as I expected it to be after Thor's first foray onto the big screen which turned out so well. Nice to know Natalie Portman is still onboard despite her near falling out with the studio over the departure of the original (female) director. Little vexation regarding Captain America: The Winter Soldier either, even though I understand this overly patriottic super soldier isn't everybody's cup of tea. I'm not all that high on the Falcon being a participant, though considering his long history with Cap (the pair shared a comic book series for a long time) his presence is far from surprising. His look is pretty slick (definitely Ultimate Universe inspired, which I can appreciate), but he remains a guy with metal wings on his back, which isn't a really fancy ability to say the last. Plus, his appearance in this particular Marvel movie might spell doom for an eventual (and quite often foretold) presence of the Vulture in a future Spider-Man movie. In the latter's case, again, not much of a loss for moviegoers.
Ant-Man: now that's something I look forward to! A tough nut to crack, considering his rather awkward powers: getting small, growing tall and communicating with ants. However, also a deeply flawed though brilliant personality (depending on which particular Ant-Man they will use, since there have been multiple over the years) with a plethora of human traits making him that much more identifiable. Wife beating, voyeurist activities, having people eaten by army ants: all in a day's work for the not quite so heroic Ant-Man! Coupled with capable, witty and stylistically intriguing director Edgar Wright (of Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and Scott Pilgrim v.s. the World fame), this might very well turn out to be the most delectable and off-beat character of the bunch. It could also suck bug balls big time of course, but let's keep a little optimism here, Wright certainly deserves it.
Make Mine Marvel Phase 2! Iron Man 3 gets to kick it off in three weeks, The Avengers 2 will finish it in a few more years (2015 probably).
donderdag 28 februari 2013
Today's News: final Iron Man 3 poster
No new movie list today, hope to get back to that in the weekend. But I posted this on MovieScene the other day, so as usual I just have to post it here as well:
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/144976/nieuwe_poster_iron_man_3
I don't have much to add to what I already said about the subject in the actual news flash, other than the fact I'm increasingly excited about the project. It's got the old characters we've come to love (Stark, Pepper, Rhodey, etc.) plus several new ones played by top actors like Guy Pearce and Sir Ben Kingsley. Whether the Mandarin, played by the latter and already hinted at in the first film, is gonna be an intriguing villain remains to be seen but at least there's a solid actor behind the part, which is never a bad thing (then again, Kingsley did play Thunderbirds adversary the Hood in the 2004 Hollywood adaptation, and that wasn't a particularly good thing...). This new poster certainly looks appealing, making it clear Iron Man isn't gonna go down without a decent fight despite the previous poster portraying him in a death defying skyfall (while on fire), making a good outcome on his part unlikely. Also visible on the new one-sheet is the Iron Legion, which is an element from the Marvel Universe I'm surprisingly unfamiliar with. I suspect Rhodey is involved with them, as it has been made clear he will be featured again as Iron Man's military counterpart War Machine, but other than that I have no clue. I don't mind, I can stand to be surprised for once.
Of course the big question now is; how will the flick, being the first installment in Marvel's eagerly anticipated Phase 2, tie in with other upcoming Marvel movies? It has to hint to The Avengers, that much is undeniable. But will it feature new superheroes we've been hoping to get a break on the silver screen? For that matter, will it feature previously established characters that first appeared in the previous Iron Man films, like Nick Fury or Black Widow? Time will tell, but it's obvious we've still only seen the tip of the iceberg where Marvel's cinematic shared universe is concerned. Make Mine Marvel!
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/144976/nieuwe_poster_iron_man_3
I don't have much to add to what I already said about the subject in the actual news flash, other than the fact I'm increasingly excited about the project. It's got the old characters we've come to love (Stark, Pepper, Rhodey, etc.) plus several new ones played by top actors like Guy Pearce and Sir Ben Kingsley. Whether the Mandarin, played by the latter and already hinted at in the first film, is gonna be an intriguing villain remains to be seen but at least there's a solid actor behind the part, which is never a bad thing (then again, Kingsley did play Thunderbirds adversary the Hood in the 2004 Hollywood adaptation, and that wasn't a particularly good thing...). This new poster certainly looks appealing, making it clear Iron Man isn't gonna go down without a decent fight despite the previous poster portraying him in a death defying skyfall (while on fire), making a good outcome on his part unlikely. Also visible on the new one-sheet is the Iron Legion, which is an element from the Marvel Universe I'm surprisingly unfamiliar with. I suspect Rhodey is involved with them, as it has been made clear he will be featured again as Iron Man's military counterpart War Machine, but other than that I have no clue. I don't mind, I can stand to be surprised for once.
Of course the big question now is; how will the flick, being the first installment in Marvel's eagerly anticipated Phase 2, tie in with other upcoming Marvel movies? It has to hint to The Avengers, that much is undeniable. But will it feature new superheroes we've been hoping to get a break on the silver screen? For that matter, will it feature previously established characters that first appeared in the previous Iron Man films, like Nick Fury or Black Widow? Time will tell, but it's obvious we've still only seen the tip of the iceberg where Marvel's cinematic shared universe is concerned. Make Mine Marvel!
zaterdag 28 april 2012
Assembly complete!
The
Avengers: Rating ****/*****, or 8/10
When
it comes to superhero movies (or just movies in general), Hollywood
is rarely thinking more than a few years forward these days. When a
superhero movie fails in some regard, the general decision is to
either ignore it for a few years or reboot it, so as to give the
franchise a fresh start (which almost always neccessitates to tell
the character's origin story all over again). Recent examples to the
latter include the Spider-Man and X-Men series, which
after a successful initial run went in the opposite direction when
failure – either to make sufficient money or to please the audience
– was somehow involved. 20th Century-Fox studio
executives therefore issued a semi-prequel for X-Men last year
(the surprisingly fun X-Men: First Class) which both retold
and contradicted its predecessors, while Spider-Man will
return in a wholly new form next month after the disappointment that
was Spider-Man 3. The former case showed that sometimes a new
direction can spawn good results, while the latter has still to prove
whether Sony Pictures' decision to simply abandon the former trilogy
completely in favour of a new team of cast and crew retelling an
already often told story was a good choice, when The Amazing
Spider-Man hits theatres in June.
However,
Marvel Studios, formerly in cooperation with Paramount, but now under
control of the Walt Disney Pictures, does things differently, and
shows some impressive long-term thinking for the various superhero
characters they still own the movie rights to. Their strategy was
simple, but effective: introduce various single characters in their
own movies, then put them all together in one giant über-blockbuster
the likes the audience has naught seen before. Of course, this
planning proved cost-effective, since the public's interest in every
character could be tested first with each film, before throwing them
all in the same mix, which also gave the studio the opportunity to
weed out any characters that proved disappointing at the box-office,
as well as keeping open the option for sequels only to the films of
certain superheroes that did prove popular, without pinning the hopes
solely to the results of their group effort. And so in the last few
years, we were treated to various very different superhero flicks:
Iron Man (immediately proving to be the most enduring
character of the bunch), The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2,
Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger. Every one
of these films contained various scenes and hints at the others and
to the final Avengers product, so the studio could slowly but
surely build up momentum, making the audience ever more interested
and hyped for just what was in store for them. And now, after having
waited and been teased for over four years, the Marvel Universe is
fleshed out far more than would ever have been possible without this
careful planning, due to the success of all these movies, resulting
finally in the superhero-spectacle-to-end-all-superhero-spectacles,
The Avengers.
And
story wise, the best bit is we don't have to sit through all the
characters' origin stories again, since that has all been done for us
already, so we can just see the heroes we're already familiar with
teaming up against a common foe. Warning:
spoilers ahead! This foe, logically chosen, is of course
Thor's semi-brother Loki (a wonderfully creepy and vile Tom
Hiddleston), the only one of the characters' enemies to pack enough
of a punch on a large scale to be a true menace to all mankind. After
having fallen from the realm of Asgard, this bad guy disappeared out
of the picture for a while, returning with a vengeance by teaming up
with a mysterious alien race, hellbent on conquering Earth via the
use of the Tesseract (a source of great energy first introduced in
Captain America's private cinematic venture). This device has been in
the hands of the S.H.I.E.L.D. secret service since the Thor
movie, but Loki manages to infiltrate the research base and steal it,
along with the minds of various base personnel, including their super
archery agent Hawkeye (an agitated Jeremy Renner, so far only briefly
spotted in Thor), much to the chagrin of Director Nick Fury
(Samuel L. Jackson, charismatic and ready for combat as always) and
his other top agent Black Widow (beautiful bad girl Scarlett
Johansson, who was previously seen watching Iron Man's ass in Iron
Man 2), who had a personal relationship with Hawkeye. Realizing a
nemesis has appeared that threatens the whole world, Fury re-recruits
the various superhuman characters we've seen before. And thus Dr.
Bruce Banner (newcomer Mark Ruffalo, taking over from Edward Norton
and doing a good job at it, portraying the troubled doctor with both
sympathy and irony) is tracked down in India, both for his knowledge
as a brilliant scientist and his anger managemant problems that
occassionally transform him into a huge green monster on a rampage
called Hulk (never angrier); Steve Rogers is pulled out of his quiet
life in Brooklyn to fight in yet another world war as Captain America,
despite having been trapped in ice since 1945 and still adjusting to
the strange new world of the early 21st century; rich
playboy Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr., once again with his energetic
flair and nonchalance that made him so popular in his previous two
films, but no drinking problems this time) is tempted into joining
the team so his Iron Man armour can be made responsible use of for a
change; and even Thor returns from the realm of the Nordic gods in
search for his brother, who he still cares about, just to find the
guy has gotten bad enough to warrant the wrath of his hammer. With
the players now all on the board, they set out to defeat Loki and
save the planet (and Hawkeye) from enslavement/destruction by the
evil aliens, resulting in many an epic battle scene, each more
grandiose and large scaled than the ones that came before.
Of
course, action alone is not enough these days (eh, Battleship?
Wrath of the Titans?), we need to care for these characters.
It really helps having gotten to know most of them and their various
traits and motivations already in their own entries into cinema, so
little additional exposition is required. But the big question
remained: how well do these characters play together? Do they have
the necessary chemistry? The answer, thankfully, is positive. Despite
the abundance of star power here assembled (how many Academy Award
winners and nominees again?), all the actors are fully into this
large group effort and none of them get in each other's way or
display so much as hints of appropriating the movie for their own
ego. The same can be said for their characters, though the plot does
call for Hawkeye to be underexposed so we still don't know much about
him (but at least we know enough), while the first Hulk
transformation takes place well into the second hour of the film, and
until that time Dr. Banner seems more aound for the techno babble,
something which plays off very well against inventor Tony Stark as a
fellow scientist, as well as to the simple grunt Captain America, who
has no idea what both great minds are talking about.
As
this scene illustrates, the strength of the characters is the way
they complement each other: Tony Stark is the inventor, the loud
mouth with the great ego, Banner the scientist who needs to restrain
his ego, Steve Rogers is the soldier who follows Fury's orders but
does a grand job himself leading the team into battle, Black Widow is
the spy who offers both incredible martial arts prowess and
infiltration techniques plus the obligatory feminine empowerment,
while Thor offers knowledge of a mystical realm beyond comprehension
of any of his team mates but necessary to defeat the villain, plus he
adds the personal drama to the group since this villain happens to be
his (adopted) brother. Iron Man represents technology (and a lot of
money, which can also come in handy), Thor stands for supernatural
power, Black Widow (and to a lesser extent, Hawkeye) offers
intelligence and bodily flexibility, Captain America brings the
leadership and combat experience, while the Hulk supplies the
necessary raw power. And so we watch the team perform in action
together, including great moments like the Captain and Iron Man
fighting back to back, playing off each other's strengths like using
Cap's shield to deflect Iron Man's rays to take out rows of bad guys,
while Thor and the Hulk try to outdo each other in brute strength,
the latter winning, when all enemies have been vanquished, by still
knocking out his friend to show him just who has the bigger set of
muscles.
It's
safe to say it's not the action but the characters that make the
movie work. Which is not surpring considering Joss Whedon has been
placed into the director's chair: if anyone knows about characters,
it's him, which he has proven on the small screen with his excellent
ensemble casts in both Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Firefly,
and was once again shown to be the case in the recent fabulous horror
pastiche The Cabin in the Woods, which he co-wrote. And Whedon
being Whedon, we get his trademark humour thrown in for free. None of
this huge display of comic book power in audiovisual form would do as
well without some much needed levity, telling us we shouldn't take
all of this too seriously, which only increases the film's overall
sense of fun. Moments of great suspense are interwoven seemlessly
with superbly timed jokes, submitted by all characters, even the
antagonists. By mixing humour, action and drama alike, while all the
way making us root for every heroic character, Whedon proves he's
well up to the task of tackling such a monumental undertaking,
despite his limit experience as a motion picture director (the
fantastic Serenity so far was his only foray into cinematic
directorial duty, but already proved just what the guy was capable
of).
Which
is not to say The Avengers is without flaws, but fortunately
they are but few. The role of Loki's alien henchmen and their
specific identity and origins remain underexplained, making them
little more than cannon fodder. Visually they look fine (as does the
whole film) but they lack a soul and clearly exposed motivations
other than being just mere minions. Hawkeye's lack of a character
set-up was already mentioned above, while the same can be said for
Nick Fury, the man who assembles this team of heroes: we've seen him
in almost all of the previous separate films, pulling strings and
initiating the formation of the Avengers ever since the end credits
of Iron Man first ended, but we still know little about the
man himself. Sure, he's in charge of S.H.I.E.L.D. but just who does
this organisation really answer to? This film shows him communicating
with “the council” (whatever that is), a group of poorly lit,
shady, nameless characters on monitors, but just who these people are
and why Fury adheres to their commands remains secretive, so the
audience too isn't sure what to make of Fury himself. This does add
some mystery to this already mysterious man, but also feels like the
writers either didn't really know or didn't care enough to explain it
better. However, we may still get our answers, a Nick Fury film has
already been acknowledged to be produced soon.
Fortunately
for the general public, the good stuff in The Avengers far
outweighs the not so good, and we are treated to 142 minutes of utter
fun as we see great characters (possibly soo to be iconic) teaming up
for equally great action, great comedy and great visuals, the latter
ranging from enormous flying aircraft carriers to a devastated New
York swarming with serpentine alien attack ships being taken down by
Earth's Mightiest Heroes. Marvel Studios can sit back and relax:
their four year gamble has payed off, made them billions of dollars
(this movie alone is gonna break records for sure), garnered much
acclaim from critics and fans alike, and paved the way for many more
entries into this cinematic Marvel Universe, so we can enjoy Iron
Man 3, Thor 2, Captain America 2, and of course The
Avengers 2 in the next couple of years, with other related Marvel
projects also to have been confirmed to tie in to this quickly
expanding canon. After the steadily rising levels of success
witnessed so far, culminating in the world wide nerdgasm that is The
Avengers, we can do nothing but look forward to more Marvels,
hopefully for decades to come. Preferably with Whedon involved, but
we'll take them without if needs be.
And
watch the trailer here:
And
the Avengers' troubles have only just begun... be sure to stick
around for the mid-credits scene to find out why! Or simply watch the
picture below for the identity of their new archenemy.
Labels:
Avengers,
Black Widow,
Captain America,
Chris Evans,
Chris Hemsworth,
Hawkeye,
Hulk,
Iron Man,
Jeremy Renner,
Joss Whedon,
Loki,
Marvel,
Nick Fury,
Robert Downey,
Samuel L. Jackson,
Scarlett Johansson,
Thanos,
Thor
donderdag 2 februari 2012
Iron Man 2
Rating: ***/*****, or 7/10
Marvels
reclamebureau in actie
Voor diegenen die het gemist hebben, de
film Iron Man had nog een
scène na de aftiteling. Hierin was te zien hoe de man achter de
Ijzeren Man, Tony Stark (uitstekend vertolkt door Robert Downey Jr.),
benaderd werd door een schimmig figuur met een ooglapje (Samuel L.
Jackson), die hem wilde rekruteren voor het superhelden-genootschap
genaamd de 'Avengers'. Men had er beter aan gedaan deze scène direct
voor in plaats van direct achter de end
credits te plaatsen, want
het was een veelzeggende eerste stap voor het merendeel van de
superheldenfilms die Marvel Studios de komende jaren voor ons in
petto heeft. Althans, dat wil Marvel ons doen geloven, waardoor het
verwijzen naar andere superhelden in Iron
Man 2 een stuk uitvoeriger
aan bod komt, soms met verwarrende gevolgen.
Desondanks
neemt Marvels uitbundige reclamewerk in de opvolger niet weg dat Iron
Man 2 een prima te verteren superheldenfilm vormt, met de
gebruikelijke aaneenschakeling van onderhoudende actiescènes en
opnieuw prima acteerwerk, vooral van Downey Jr. als de narcistische
en arrogante uitvinder Stark, die zijn voortbestaan als superheld
niet alleen vanuit meerdere hoeken bedreigd ziet, maar ook meer
persoonlijke crises doormaakt. De verrassing is er echter af,
waardoor Iron Man 2 het niveau van de voorganger net niet
haalt, maar het desondanks toch een fijne film vormt.
Zes
maanden na de gebeurtenissen in de eerste film moet Tony Stark zich
meten met een Senaatscommissie die het hightech stalen harnas van hem
af wil nemen, want burgers horen niet met dergelijke wapens rond te
lopen. Collega-industrieel Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell, met haast
dezelfde hoeveelheid hufterige flair en charisma als Downey Jr.)
staat al handenwrijvend klaar om Starks militaire contract over te
nemen en zijn concurrent zodoende uit te rangeren. Voorts kampt Stark
met toenemende bloedvergiftiging door zijn gebruik van het
mechanische kostuum, waardoor hij zich immer meer labiel en asociaal
gaat gedragen en van zijn naasten vervreemd: vooral zijn relatie met
secretaresse annex love interest Pepper Potts (de wederom
schattige Gwyneth Paltrow) lijdt hier zwaar onder. Alsof dat nog niet
genoeg is duikt er een Russische schurk, genaamd Ivan Vanko (prima
rol voor zwaargewicht Mickey Rourke), op, die nog een persoonlijk
appeltje te schillen heeft met Stark wegens het onrecht dat diens
vader door Tony's vader is aangedaan, en hem gewapend met een met
zwepen getooid gevechtspak te lijf gaat, alvorens een geheim
monsterverbond met Hammer te vormen en voor hem een legertje
kwaadaardige gevechtsrobots te bouwen. Tenslotte heeft Stark ook nog
zijn eigen vader-zooncomplex op te lossen. Het zal niemand verbazen
als blijkt dat het nu verhaaltechnische overvolle Iron Man 2
meer plotlijnen moet afhandelen dan eigenlijk nodig was, waardoor
niet alles even goed uit de verf komt.
Regisseur Jon Favreau manoeuvreert
zich met de nodige humor en vaart door de meeste verhaallijnen heen,
wat in het voordeel werkte van de ook door hem geregisseerde
voorganger, en in het geval van dit tweede deel tenminste zorgt voor
een onderhoudend geheel. Downey laat hierbij duidelijk merken zich
opnieuw uitstekend te vermaken in zijn rol als de instabiele
superheld, wat wederom een op alle fronten geslaagde acteerprestatie
van zijn kant oplevert. Ook met de minder luchtige kanten van het
verhaal kan hij goed uit de voeten, wat zorgt voor een geloofwaardig
verloop van de persoonlijke narigheid die Stark doormaakt. Het is in
dit opzicht het script dat tegenzit, en voor een afhandeling van
zaken zorgt die hoofdzakelijk vraagtekens oplevert. Hoe het
bijvoorbeeld nou precies zit met Starks vader, die zijn zoon postuum
de blauwdrukken geeft voor een nieuw element blijft een raadsel,
evenals de reden dat dit Tony's gezondheidsproblemen tegelijkertijd
oplost.
Het scenario maakt zich er op sommige
punten te gemakzuchtig vanaf, maar dat mag de pret niet drukken. De
actie blijft subliem, zowel qua vormgeving als uitvoering, en dus
bekommeren we ons niet om het gerommel met Starks bloedvergiftiging
als hij samen met zijn nieuwe collega blikken man War Machine (Don
Cheadle) een aanval van kwaadwillende metalen monsters doorstaat. Ook
het gehalte aan humor is behouden gebleven en zorgt voor de nodige
glimlach, want ondanks de hoeveelheid aan serieuze thema's die de
film aankaart moeten we het geheel ook weer niet al te serieus nemen.
En tussen alle relationele crises en
uitbundig wapengekletter zet Marvels reclamecampagne zich voort.
Samuel L. Jackson heeft dit keer een grotere rol als de geheimzinnige
Nick Fury die de zelfdestructieve Tony Stark in toom probeert te
houden zodat Iron Man zich bij de Avengers kan aansluiten. Wie de
slotscène van de eerste film gemist heeft zal zich slechts afvragen
wie die man met dat ooglapje in vredesnaam is. Ook de rol die diens
agente Natasha Romanoff (een overdreven harde Scarlett Johansson)
precies speelt terwijl ze infiltreert als Starks nieuwe secretaresse,
blijft goeddeels onduidelijk. Naast het zorgvuldig toewerken naar The
Avengers (verwacht in 2012) bevat Iron Man 2 een
hoeveelheid knipogen naar onder andere Captain America en
Thor, die volgend jaar de bioscoop (on)veilig zullen maken.
Iron Man 2 biedt gastoptredens van onder andere War Machine,
Black Widow, Nick Fury en Whiplash, maar het grootste deel van het
publiek heeft geen idee wie deze lui mogen zijn.
De Marvel-fans onder ons zullen
zodoende meer uit de voeten kunnen met bepaalde personages en namen
dan de leken, die juist de nodige vraagtekens zullen plaatsen.
Echter, beide groepen treffen in Iron Man 2 een geslaagde
actiefilm met de juiste mix van humor en vaart, aangevuld met enkele
zwaardere thema's die, hoewel niet allen even netjes afgehandeld, de
film toch een meerwaarde geven over doorsnee superheldenfilms. Hoe
dat nou precies zit met die Avengers zien we in 2012 wel.
En laat deel één
een les voor U zijn: blijf dit keer wel zitten tot de
aftiteling voorbij is...
Labels:
Black Widow,
Iron Man,
iron man 2,
John Favreau,
Marvel,
Robert Downey,
Robert Downey Jr.,
Scarlett Johansson,
science fiction,
super hero movie,
superheroes,
war machine,
whiplash
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)














