Posts tonen met het label graphic novel. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label graphic novel. Alle posts tonen

maandag 31 maart 2014

Today's Review: 300: Rise of an Empire





300: Rise of an Empire: ***/*****, or 6/10

The visually unusual action-on-steroid flick 300 proved to be quite the unexpected box office success back in 2006. It took a while before the army of pixel pushing programmers got reassembled for a second chance at glory, which many blamed on Frank Miller, the writer/artist of the original graphic novel of the same name. Considering Miller isn't even done publishing his follow-up Xerxes yet and the current sequel 300: Rise of an Empire hardly follows that particular story, such critique is quite unfounded. This second installment could have been shot years ago, and it would probably have been for the better, since the distinguished visual style that characterizes both this movie and its predecessor has been copied almost as often as the signature quote 'This is Sparta!' has since been enthusiastically and overly loudly uttered in fanboy circles. But what becomes quite clear early on upon watching Rise of an Empire, is that 'this' is not Sparta anymore.

Rise of an Empire, from a narrative viewpoint, serves as both a prequel and a sequel to 300, and even has some of the newly depicted events take place simultaneously with its illustrious forebear. The result is a rather uncomfortable mix of separate story elements all cramped together in one movie that feels the need to both explain the motives behind the ruthless conquest of the antagonist, the Persian king Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro), and explore the political intrigue between the various Greek city-states that must unite against him to keep Greece Greek. The movie flashes back to Xerxes' past as easily as it does to the outcome of the battle of Thermopylae, which makes for an overall chaotic feel that was lacking in the original 300, whose narrative structure proved less distracting and more coherent. The movie starts with the history of how Xerxes became king of Persia after the death of his father at the hands of the Athenian Themistokles, and his rise to power afterwards guided by delusions of divinity. A supernatural element provided by some fluorescent pool in a cave which supposedly made him a god is all too easily discarded by the spectator from its inception, as he/she has already seen the scar Leonidas gave him in the previous film, which effectively stripped him of his godlike status. And as soon as the movie is done demystifying the giant despot, who we find out basically grew from a whimpy princeling's grief over his father, the title of the film makes progressively little sense, as we're only ten minutes into the movie. It took that long for the titular 'empire' to 'rise', now the remaining 90 minutes will be spend on bringing about its decline.



More poignant to the title's failure is the fact Xerxes is merely a supporting character to the overall story, as the movie is based around the personal battle between Themistokles (Sullivan Stapleton) and his Persian counterpart, Artemisia (Eva Green), the vengeful admiral of Xerxes' navy. Artemisia is a sly, seductive and manipulative woman who pressured her king into going to war with Greece, despite the advice of his dying father against participating in such a costly, doomed exercise. As a horribly abused former child slave of Greek descent, she has some personal issues with the Greeks to conclude, which brings her head-on with the Athenian statesman. Green portrays this strong woman with visible delight and ensures the enemy's side is not devoid of the necessary charisma, which would have played well off Gerard Butler's equally commanding Leonidas. Unfortunately, she has to make do with Stapleton's rather bland Themistokles instead, who proves to lack the gravitas one would expect from such a renowned politician. Equipped with largely the same ideological motivations as Leonidas, Themistokles keeps droning on about the magnificence of Greek freedom as opposed to Persian tyranny, which he deems so grand and noble it's worth risking every soldier's life to uphold it. Problem is, because of Artemisia's distressing background of pain and suffering such lines are somewhat rendered moot, as we know the limits of Greek freedom, while Leonidas at least did a much catchier job at delivering them and inspiring his troops to kick Persian ass. We'd be inclined to pick Artemisia's side, were it not for her routine of viciously despatching her bumbling commanders in disturbing ways.

300: Rise of an Empire proves to be a telling case of 'girl power' over the political machinations of the men who assume command. The film reintroduces the character of Queen Gorgo (Lena Headey), who also serves as the film's narrator. It's not the endless quasi-poetic lines the script supplies her, it's her ability to stand up to Themistokles and voice her displeasure with his approach to fight “his” war, coupled with her own desire to right the wrong that was done to her and Sparta, that make her more compelling to watch and listen to than her Athenian rival. Gorgo proves at least as tough a female presence as Artemisia and the two are almost kindred spirits if they hadn't been fighting on opposing sides. Unfortunately they do not grace the screen together but are both limited to interacting with the boring Themistokles. A showdown between both female characters would have been preferable, but sadly we are denied. Too bad, it's not like these movies care the least bit for historical accuracy.



Though narratively and emotionally this semi-sequel turns out to be a mixed bag, it's the action and visual flair characteristic of the established 300 style that should make the film. In that regard the movie leaves little room for disappointment. However, because of 300's then-originality and the numerous copycats that followed it, there's little novelty to discern here. If you expected excessively muscled men beating their adversaries in all manner of gruesome, bloody ways, usually shown in extreme slow-motion shots against obviously digital backdrops, that's what you'll receive. Athenian muscles are not as outrageous as their Spartan counterparts, which is probably a good thing as it ought to cause less physical insecurity amongst the audience's male demographic (though the same may not be said of Artemisia's ample bosom dimensions for female viewers). Since most of the movie revolves around the naval battles between the Greek and Persian fleets, the movie differs in tone with its predecessor mostly in that regard, trading in the earthy red colour pattern for a blue maritime quality. The bombastic hardrock style soundtrack remains to great effect though. Epic shots of ships ramming into each other and the various tactics applied by both naval commanders to do as much damage as possible serve the majority of the film's action sequences, but it cannot be helped that these start to feel tedious as the movie progresses. Battles on boats simply do not provide the same opportunity for colourful combat diversity as land battles do due to their limiting nature. Don't expect to see any monstrous men, elephants or rhinos fighting in Artemisia's war. The script apparently acknowledged this lack of fantasy by adding a strange dream sequence in which a drowning Themistokles envisions giant marine reptiles picking off his men as they lie dying in the water. As any expensive blockbuster sequel of today, this movie is billed a 3D-experience, but little effective use is made of that technology. There's the occasional arrow or spear in your face, but otherwise the film offers little remarkable in this regard.

300: Rise of an Empire is a fairly decent follow-up to its predecessor that proves largely devoid of surprise or inspiration and arrives a little late to the battlefield, but does what people expect it to do. It packs quite a punch in the female acting department, but its male stars and their motives are simply not as interesting to keep your attention from drifting on the waves of its maritime action scenes. Though it serves its obligatory bit of gory battle scenes, it stylistically can't stand up to its predecessor and feels like little more than a compendium piece in terms of story. It will definitely not rank as high on a popcultural level, absent absurdly cocky but highly quotable lines that proved 300's trademark and are sorely missed here. Truth is, Athenians are just a lot less fun to go to battle with than those delightfully over-the-top-and-then-some Spartans with their constant flow of witty reprisal.





donderdag 6 maart 2014

Today's Double News: dinosaur robots and neo-noir strip routines



I got some more stuff up on MovieScene yesterday and managed to post it here today, as ought to be the natural routine I have increasingly less time to adhere to, alas.

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/154236/nieuwe_fotos_sin_city_a_dame_to_kill_for

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/154235/eerste_trailer_transformers_age_of_extinction

This is so typical. I loathed the previous threesome of Transformers flicks, yet I still keep looking forward to the next installment even though I know it's gonna suck robots balls (and that these robots even have genitals is something unfortunately established in the second movie). I should know better by now. Maybe it's because this time there's dinosaurs involved too? Yeah, like that makes a difference for the overall (lack of) quality as long as Michael Bay is still directing! If I didn't care for supposedly paleontologically correct dinosaurs in the recent Walking with Dinosaurs 3D flick, robot dinosaurs also doesn't exactly sound like stuff right up my alley. I guess I've become too picky as I've grown old and sour. Trading in Shia LaBeouf for Mark Wahlberg is also less than a stellar improvement, but an improvement nonetheless. As was the case with the previous Tranny films, there's some good actors around, but this is not the type of films that revolves around acting. These are eye candy movies for immature audiences, where half the movie consists of overly loud, endless action scenes with explosions every other minute and the rest of the time is filled with hot chicks bending over socially sexualized vehicles while utterly cringe worthy poop jokes are produced. Inbetween there is something of a story line to discern but it makes little sense and is otherwise completely forgotten when the credits end rolling. There are visual FX driven movies that provide a singularly memorable, thoroughly absorbing viewing experience, like Gravity, and there is its exact opposite: Transformers 1 through 3. Fourth time is the charm? I don't think so. Yet I will still end up torturing myself as I go and see it (for free, obviously: torturing yourself and paying for it is just too much pain). It will probably be another bad film, but at the very least robots morphing into dinosaurs can't be worse than robots shapeshifting into cars. It just can't, I refuse to believe it...

And then there's the type of VFX movie where the effects form the setting, dominating the visual style but not driving the story per se, as that is still up to the actors. Like Sin City. And its sequel, A Dame to Kill For. In the case of such films, acting is a quintessential ingredient, and the actors find their capabilities tested to their absolute limits acting against nothing but blue (or green, it varies) all around them. Some actors don't do so well in this scenario, as Rosario Dawson and Jessica Alba showed in the previous adventure taking place in the City of Sins. Hopefully they've grown and prove more up to the task in the sequel, as both of them are back for more. As are characters like Hartigan (Bruce Willis) and Marv (Mickey Rourke), despite both of them kicking the bucket before. As this movie takes place before the events of the first film, that ought not be an issue. In fact, this film will answer questions raised by its predecessor. For one thing, why did Dwight have to change his facial appearance (from Sin 2's Josh Brolin to Sin's Clive Owen)? With exactly the same people both in front and behind of the camera, I have full faith in this project, though I agree it doesn't score points in terms of originality. If the quality of the movie gets anywhere near the level of the first installment - still a much appreciated entry in my personal Top-29 of 10/10 rated movies - you won't hear me complaining. Even if Alba once again takes out her no-nudity clause and keeps her clothes on while playing the stripper, despite the graphic novel the movie so faithfully reproduces for the big screen revealing quite a lot more black&white skin.






zaterdag 14 december 2013

Today's News: a dame to kill for teases us



Another poster I posted on MS the other day:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/152398/eerste_poster_sin_city_a_dame_to_kill_for

This is about as teasery as a teaser poster can get. You got all the basics you need to titillate the audience about your movie, but next to nothing on what the film itself is about except for those few clues the title provides. There's a captivating visual image to raise the spectator's curiosity, in this case a stylized pair of red lips with cigarette smoke emanating from them against a bleak, dark rainy background. Then there's a title, a long list of cast names (both big shot names and some of less established actors, as well as returning actors and new additions in this sequel's case), a director's credit, or two in this movie's case, and a release date so audiences know when to expect this film to arrive in theaters (subject to change of course: as this movie saw its fair share of pre-production delays, this current release date may also not be wholly safe just yet). What will this movie be about, a viewer not familiar with the previous installment may wonder? Though an ominous lady will be present in a shady town where hardboiled men will fall under her dangrous spell, there's nothing more to go on except for the mental imagery of sin, lust, passion, death and betrayal this particular picture evokes. And since those were more or less the exact ingredients of the first film, this teaser poster seems to have gotten it all right.

zaterdag 19 oktober 2013

Today's Double News: Brolin's life turns Jurassic, Vaughn's life is cancelled



Another double dip of news posted by yours truly on MovieScene:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/150987/josh_brolin_mogelijk_in_jurassic_world

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/150986/vince_vaughns_term_life_gecancelled

This is the way of things in the industry: for every project that gets greenlit (even after twelve years of friggin' pre-production hell! Heartless dino-hating bastards!), several more get turned down, sometimes even while already well underway, though such a situation is more exceptional since copious amounts of money have already been spent and publicity has covered the project in question so there is some general awareness around. Let's explore what might have went wrong with Term Life.

It seems an interesting project, sure to find some kind of audience (though probably not as major as the studio had hoped for). It has a fairly solid plot which guarantees an appealing mixture of drama, action and humor. It's a graphic novel/comic book adaptation, which is all the rage these last few years (and that rage hasn't quite yet died down). However, Image Comics, though a well renowned and established company in the world of paper media (responsible for, among others, Todd McFarlane's Spawn, Michael Turner's Witchblade and The Darkness by Ennis & Silvestri), doesn't come with a brand name that screams 'hype', unlike its major competitors Marvel and DC. There's one problem for ya. Here's another: Vince Vaughn. Vaughn has done almost nothing but comedy (and not always good comedy at that) for over a decade. So could he be a compelling enough actor to also take care of the dramatic, emotional side of this story, as well as make a convincing action hero? Though he has dabbled in such elements of acting before in films as diverse as Into the Wild, Psycho (the remake, obviously) and The Lost World: Jurassic Park (which spawned no less than three action figures in his likeness; see my Jurassic Park Toy Review Archive for more details on that), his talents in both department remain limited, while most spectators can only see him as a comedic actor because of the overwhelming portion of said genre in his resumé, which would make it harder for the general - target - audience to accept him in a role like this. It seems the real talent would have been delivered by young actress Hailee Steinfeld, Oscar-nominated for True Grit. In this case the trouble is that film is basically the only stand-out title in her career, promising as it may be, but short as it yet is. True, she will soon be seen in the big budget Sci-Fi action flick Ender's Game, but as that feature has not yet been released it's too soon to pin a studio's hopes on Steinfeld just for that one. Term Life is no True Grit, so Steinfeld's participation also is not a guarantee for success. Nor is the intended direction by Peter Billingsley, whose curriculum vitae in that particular function also is far from impressive. His only feature of note in this regard is Couples Retreat, a comedy starring Vince Vaughn (and not one of his better ones), which brings us full circle to the matter of comedy versus other human emotions present in Term Life.

Overall, there's many variables and risks present in Term Life a new studio executive would not have been comfortable with, sadly making it an easy target for premature cancellation to save a few bucks that can then be spend on sure-to-deliver blockbuster projects. In Universal's case, one of them being... Jurassic World! Josh Brolin's apparent soon-to-be-payed salary has to come from somewhere. And Brolin is an intriguing choice for JW. He has done similar genre projects before to great success in terms of his acting (Planet Terror, Hollow Man), while also having been a star in completely different types of film the likes of No Country for Old Men and Milk. His name brings audience recognition, Oscar-nominated past performances that transcend genre and an acting job that is sure to satiate execs' expectations. Every risk you have in Term Life is absent in his persona. Do I agree with cancelling Term Life? Not per se, but if its "insurance money" is pumped into Jurassic World's undoubtedly stellar budget, I'm all for it. All's fair in Love, War and Jurassic Park. Plus, Vaughn has already been involved in one of those, so now it's Brolin's turn.

zaterdag 17 augustus 2013

Today's Mini-Reviews: oldies packing some punch




The Lone Ranger: ***/*****, or 6/10

Big budget remake of the classic radio play and television series appropriates the success formula formerly applied to the Pirates of the Caribbean films, which is not surprising considering the same people and studio that made those swashbucklers are behind this project. Produced by Jerry Bruckheimer for Disney and directed by Gore Verbinski, The Lone Ranger once again makes ample use of Johnny Depp's uncanny talent for playing weird, seemingly mentally unbalanced outcasts, considered a main audience draw for which Depp as usual received top billing, even though he does not play the titular character (in that regard it's Alice in Wonderland all over again). This time Depp assumes the mantle of the Lone Ranger's iconic Indian sidekick, Tonto, who recalls his adventures with the movie's actual hero at extreme old age, stuck in a sideshow tour as a noble savage. This framing of a tale within a tale is rather annoying as the movie tends to swivel from one version of Tonto to the other at moments where such distraction is not at all warranted and takes the pace out of the piece. Armie Hammer (The Social Network) plays John Reid, an overly morally righteous lawyer who must cope with the fact that the rules of law simply don't apply in the Wild West, especially when those in power make their own law. As a result, his valiant brother is killed and he himself is left for dead, until Tonto “resurrects” him and helps him get in shape as a masked Ranger who fights for justice and protects the weak from those who would corrupt the law for their own nefarious purposes. Enter an unscrupulous railroad tycoon and his sinister henchman with a taste for excessive violence (the ever eerie William Fichtner), who mean to instigate a war with the Indians in order to move in on their territory that contains huge silver deposits. Reid and Tonto, who is also an outcast amongst his own tribe for being a supposed nutcase, must find a way to expose the plot as well as save Reid's sweet sister-in-law and her young son.

This results in the usual action driven plot, moving from setpiece to setpiece through all the old Western locales, including a whorehouse run by Helena Bonham Carter (equipped with an ivory faux leg of large calibre), Native American teepee villages and the indispensable classic Fordian landscapes of canyons and unusual rock formations no Western ought to do without. Except from the climactic train chase, which admittedly is one of the finest and funniest ever put on film, most action scenes cannot escape a sense of staleness. Depp does his usual thing on autopilot, playing Tonto as a psychologically ambiguous character that gets into trouble regularly but always manages to pull himself out, more with luck than through his wits as he stumbles into one Keaton-esque gag after the other, while the naive but handsome Reid follows the predictable path from idealistic city boy to genuine Western hero. As was the case with the Pirates movies, there is a distinct supernatural flavor to the story which both feels confusing and often out of place, though adding to Tonto's mystique but also to his establishment as a totally silly character. And what's the deal with having Fichtner cut out and consume the hearts of his adversaries while he's clearly a stupendously terifying character already? Despite Depp's presence, The Lone Ranger couldn't connect with American audiences and ended up a domestic flop, though at the moment of writing it's too early to tell whether the same is true from an international perspective. For this failure producers and actors, in an odd moment of anger made public, blamed the critics who according to them panned the movie for its numerous production troubles, but that's a wholly nonsensical notion since due to the ever growing advent of opinionated online writing about movies critics just aren't heeded to as they once used to be: also, many movies critics regard as bad continue to do well regardless (Transformers, Scary Movie, etc.). Apparently the people that made this movie just didn't see both the lack of creative quality in their own project – though it's not as bad as some would have you believe, it's definitely not a grand and memorable blockbuster flick either – and the overuse of Disney's formulaic line of thinking that already started to backfire on the Pirates movies. Incidentally, those that follow the current TV-series Hell on Wheels, that largely delves into the same historic and thematic material as this film, will find little in here that that show didn't do before (and better). Except for the train chase of course.




Red 2: ***/*****, or 7/10

Sequel to Red (2010) (Retired: Extremely Dangerous), based on the graphic novels by Warren Ellis, continues the simple tradition its predecessor so successfully kicked off, delightfully combining well respected grand actors with dynamic action sequences and any number of nifty explosions. Bruce Willis, John Malkovich and Helen Mirren reunite as a band of retired government agents, all still extremely accomplished killers nevertheless. Morgan Freeman has been traded in for Anthony Hopkins and David Thewlis, which is not the worst deal imaginable though Freeman's charming character is still sorely missed (but even in an over-the-top action franchise like this, dead is dead). Living a quiet, everyday life with his new girlfriend Sarah (Mary-Louise Parker), ex-CIA operative Frank Moses (Willis) has no intention of getting mixed up with gunfights and conspiracies again, but such things tend to find him regardless. When his paranoid, mentally unhinged pal Marvin resorts to faking his own death, Moses finds himself sucked into another plot revolving around a portable nuclear bomb hidden in the Kremlin, something he is rumoured to be involved in. As was the case in the previous film, it's necessary for him and his friends to travel around the globe in order to piece together the puzzle, which brings them to exotic (or close to), luxurious locales including Moscow and Paris, a staple of spy films but delivered with ample fervour not to get noticed. Thrown in the mix are Hopkins as an unbalanced inventor of weapons of mass destruction who has spend 20 years in a looney bin, Thewlis as a shady information dealer who much prefers the good things in life (like hideously expensive rare wines) over gunplay and gratuitous violence, Catherine Zeta-Jones as a foxy agent sharing a history with Moses and out to seduce him once more, and, as before, Brian Cox as a former Russian KGB-officer and hopeless romantic who appreciates the sight of his beloved Helen Mirren offing people over all else. As the merry band of aging killers shoots and bombs its way through the plot, Moses must also come to terms with his younger and inexperienced girlfriend, who now considers this sort of bloody adventure a neat holiday trip and bonding experience, and takes as much points as she can in the art of mayhem, much to his chagrin (and a far cry from the not quite so enthusiastic Sarah from the first film). Suffice to say, if you're not a fan of guns and other assorted weaponry, this movie is definitely not recommended to you. However, like the first Red, this successor is nothing but a highly entertaining action flick that appropriates the huge talents of the renowned actors it has brought together to great effect, clearly enabling the ensemble to have a blast itself. Though the movie is otherwise devoid of narrative surprises, the high levels of good fun and a decent number of high paced action scenes make for a decent way to spend your two hours.


donderdag 11 juli 2013

Today's News: LXG getting the TV treatment



Here's another bit of news I posted on MovieScene:

http://www.moviescene.nl/p/148484/tv-serie_the_league_of_extraordinary_gentlemen_in_de_planning

A TV show based off a graphic novel series, what will Fox think of next?! Just as is the case with their rivalry with Marvel Studios, Fox continues to be one step behind the more innovative and imaginative production companies. After all, shows adapted from comics have already been pioneered by others, most notably The Walking Dead, with Marvel now following suit with their S.H.I.E.L.D. series due this fall. Oh well, if there's quality involved, I will not complain about Fox being late to the game. But will there be? After all, Fox has already adapted The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (commonly referred to in brief as LXG) before for the big screen, exactly ten years ago to this week. Apparently it didn't prove a very faithful adaptation. I honestly wouldn't know, since I have yet to read the original LXG by Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neill (I can't read everything you know, and I'm currently still working my way, slowly but surely, through A Song of Ice and Fire). I must say, I enjoyed the movie for its fabulous look, its dynamic action scenes and its intriguing cast of characters, many of them played by notable character actors (Tony Curran, Stuart Townsend, Naseeruddin Shah, Jason Flemyng), but I agree a movie that changes the make-up of its story and characters and even adds one or two for its own purposes isn't very loyal to its source material. Hopefully Fox will do better in that regard this time around, though I fear that won't be the case, knowing it's penned and overseen by someone who wrote that hideous Green Lantern flick a few years back. It's not a good sign when a show based on a graphic novel is run by someone who hasn't shown to do justice to comic books when adapting them to an audiovisual medium before. However, let's not get too desperate before we know how the pilot has been received. That will still take a while, and in the meantime there's still plenty of good television, comic book based or not, to behold on the small screen. Too much good TV shows in fact these days, and only so little time! Can you blame me for not getting around to reading graphic novels anymore...?

zondag 7 april 2013

Today's mini-reviews

Though my posting of news and reviews originally meant for MovieScene continues to advance my blog in terms of content, the posting of mini-reviews of recently seen movies is still somewhat lagging behind. I hope to catch up on it soon, so here's another batch of short critiques to fill that gap. There isn't that much more of these to come at the moment, but since I still watch new films every week, that might change if I don't get them all up faster. So no time to lose!




De Wederopstanding van een Klootzak: ****/*****, or 7/10

Probably one of the most originally titled Dutch films (official English title: The Resurrection of a Bastard), this cinematic adaptation of the graphic novel of the same name by original author Guido van Driel is both a visual feast and a character study of a small time crime boss (Yorick van Wageningen in one of his best roles yet) whose life is changed after a failed assassination attempt. Van Wageningen does an excellent job at playing both sides of Ronnie B., but the vile, 'bastard' side sticks with you the most. As violent and despicable as Ronnie used to be before – aspects of his character of which we get to see our fair share in flashbacks; we'll never forget the disturbing connection between eye balls and vacuum cleaners... – afterwards he's a peaceful, caring man, and has even seemed to be given the ability to see danger coming when he saves someone else's life. Tracking down his would-be killer (either for forgiveness or retribution, the movie doesn't provide a clear answer on that) to Dokkum, his destiny soon becomes intertwined with the locals, including an elderly couple who was once wronged by him and an African immigrant who means to make something of his life against all odds. As befits a graphic novel adaptation, Van Driel does not ignore the visual aspect, resulting in surprisingly impressive vistas of Friesland and Dokkum, as well as poetic shots of semi-sacred trees that play an integral part in the plot and the history of the town. Another good Dutch movie in the same year as De Ontmaagding van Eva van End, who would have guessed there is still so much talent in the Dutch film industry?




Lincoln: ****/*****, or 7/10

Another one of Steven Spielberg's historical dramas regarding American history, this time centered around the person of Abraham Lincoln at the time of the last year of the American Civil War, as he attempts to have the Thirteenth Amendment, which would mean the abolition of slavery, passed. Focusing less on the war and more on the battleground that is politics, Lincoln is not at all portrayed in the same saint like quality we have come to expect from Hollywood, but more as an insidiously pragmatic politician who's not afraid to engage in less cleaner tactics to achieve his goals. Wheeling and dealing his way through the House of Representatives to secure enough votes to make this historic change to the Consitution possible, the audience has to stay sharp to follow all the political intrigue and squabbling, which tends to dominate the picture a little too much at times. Though not the centrepiece of the film, the tragedy of the Civil War is not neglected, as we witness various dramatic scenes of carnage and human suffering on both sides. The problem Lincoln faces is whether to end this onslaught on his terms, freeing all the slaves simultaneously, or accepting the Confederate terms instead which would not reach that goal but would make for an easier restoration of the country. Going to enormous lengths to hide the Confederate offer, Lincoln and his closest advisors have to race against the clock to get the Amendment passed and persuade (or in some cases downright bribe) enough political adversaries to join their cause. At the same time, Abe has to contend with problems at home, as his son (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) rebels against him in an attempt to join the army, much to his mother's (Sally Field) dismay. An excellent cast through and through: even the less noteworthy parts seem to be occupied by notable character actors only, but of course Daniel Day-Lewis utterly dominates the film in his all too human portrayal of the ill-fated American president. It got him another Oscar, well deserved as always, but not much of a surprise to anyone. Of the total of twelve Academy Award nominations, the film only took home one more statue for Best Production design: also very much earned, considering the fabulous, but raw and gritty, look of 1865 Washington and its political arena.




Last Stand, The: ***/*****, or 7/10

After playing small parts in The Expendables (2010) and its sequel, The Last Stand finally marks the definitive return of the Austrian Oak in a starring role – his first since 2003's Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines – to the genre he helped define in prior decades. Sherrif Owens leads a quiet life in the small backward town of Sommerton Junction near the Mexican border, where not much ever happens except for the mayor parking his car in all the wrong places. Unfortunately for both the sherrif and his town, this peaceful situation is about to change drastically when a ruthless drug lord (delightfully wicked Eduardo Noriega) escapes police custody after a carefully planned and elaborately staged bust-out, racing to the Mexican border with a hostage with only Owens and his small staff of inexperienced deputies (some only present for poorly executed comic relief unfortunately) standing is his path. As we have come to expect from Schwarzenegger in whatever role, he doesn't take this kind of shit from anyone and prepares a warm welcome for the gangster boss and his band of merciless minions, who are armed to the teeth in an outrageous fashion and led by the maniacal Peter Stormare. He has little choice, considering the bumbling FBI agents (led by Forest Whitaker) are ever one step behind in catching up with the crook, so Arnie might as well do things all by himself once more. Korean director Jee-woon Kim shows he has an absolute blast with this typical plot, featuring various high speed chases and completely over-the-top action scenes, while also respecting Ahnuld's position in the genre and acknowledging his age in tongue-in-cheek dialogue. This movie is at no point meant to be taken too seriously, and people who don't can expect a fun, adrenaline rushed action flick with lots of big guns, fast cars and a few sexy dames thrown in. Schwarzenegger may be old but he's still got it where it counts.

zaterdag 4 februari 2012

Sin City




Rating: *****/*****, or 10/10

Stad der Zonde blijkt geslaagd kunstwerk

Wat is de beste manier om een graphic novel succesvol naar het witte doek te vertalen? Waar sommige regisseurs een geheel eigen draai aan het bronmateriaal geven en het eindproduct vervolgens geenszins meer lijkt op het originele werk, ondanks de behouden kwaliteit, is er ook de compleet tegenovergestelde methode: het beeld-voor-beeld omzetten van plaatje naar shot. Robert Rodriguez gebruikte deze drastische methode bij zijn bewerking van Frank Millers klassieke 'Sin City'. En verdomd, het werkt! En dat is nog een understatement...

Nadat hij in de jaren tachtig het respect voor doorsnee comics terugbracht met zijn werk in de 'Daredevil'-reeks en het magistrale 'Batman: The Dark Knight Returns' begaf Miller zich begin jaren negentig definitief op het terrein van de 'graphic novel', getekend literair hoogstaand werk dat absoluut verschilt van de laatdunkende term 'strips' waarmee het nog te vaak in associatie gebracht wordt. Millers Sin City vormt een hommage aan de 'film noir' Hollywoodfilms van de dertiger jaren, en handelt over de stad Basin City, een verdorven Sodom en Gomorra vol met hardhandige vigilantes, 'femme fatales' en moordlustige psychopaten. De diverse verhalen vertellen over enkele stoere rouwdouwers die op hun eigen (gewelddadige) wijze nog een beetje orde en gerechtigheid in het door God verlaten oord handhaven, getoond in een grotendeels zwart/witte tekenstijl met hier en daar een mopje kleur.



Regisseur Rodriguez, die furore maakte met zowel hardcore actiefilms (Desperado, From Dusk Till Dawn) als films voor de hele familie (Spy Kids) toont zich in zijn bewerking een devote liefhebber van Millers magnum opus te zijn, door elke pagina, ieder plaatje, volledig te respecteren en liefdevol naar het grote scherm te verplaatsen, en daarbij zelden af te wijken van hoe Miller het voor ogen had. Dit is niet merkwaardig, aangezien hij Miller zelf als co-regisseur inschakelde om Sin City zoveel mogelijk recht te doen. Alsof twee regisseurs nog niet genoeg is draaft ook Quentin Tarantino, wiens eigen films geheel in het straatje van Sin City passen, op als gastregisseur van een enkele scène. Met dergelijk talent achter de camera is het niet vreemd dat Sin City een op alle fronten geslaagde bioscoop-ervaring is geworden.

Het eindresultaat bestaat uit vier afzonderlijke verhalen die elkaar slechts sporadisch kruisen. De geharde anti-held Marv (een uitstekende comeback van Mickey Rourke die de laatste jaren nauwelijks nog serieus te nemen viel) jaagt op de moordenaar van het hoertje Goldie (Jaime King) dat hem de beste nacht van zijn leven gunde. Een opgejaagde vrouw schakelt een huurmoordenaar (een zwoele Josh Hartnett) in voor haar zelfdoding. De sluwe Dwight (Clive Owen) schiet de prostituees van de Stad der Zonde te hulp als zij uit zelfverdediging een politieagent (een bijzonder hufterige Benicio del Toro) hebben gedood. En de laatste eerlijke agent Hartigan (de altijd betrouwbare actieheld Bruce Willis) verlaat na acht jaar de gevangenis om zijn laatste onopgeloste zaak af te ronden en een jongedame (een wulpse Jessica Alba) uit de klauwen van een gestoorde verkrachter (glansrol voor Nick Stahl) te houden. Vier verhalen die samen één film vormen, een geheel dat nooit saai wordt dankzij het grote aantal markante personages (inclusief het overschot aan bekende namen in de cast), de zinderende actiescènes en vooral de schitterende en ongeëvenaarde stijl die de film een compleet eigen karakter geeft.



Want hoewel de verhaallijnen zelf absoluut niet teleurstellen, maakt Sin City er geen geheim voor presentatie boven inhoud te verkiezen. Zoals de artiest Frank Miller elke bladzijde van de graphic novel tot een stilistisch meesterwerk tekende, zo transformeert diens discipel Rodriguez letterlijk Millers visie trouw naar bewegend beeld. Het ene na het andere fantastisch gecomponeerde shot volgt elkaar in dynamisch tempo op, alsof de camera het bronmateriaal zelf registreert. Het gehalte zwart/wit voelt sterk aan als een typische 'film noir' klassieker, ondanks het steeds terugkerende minimalistisch kleurenspel. De kunst van de graphic novel blijft zodanig intact en zelfs verbeterd in Rodriguez' liefdevolle adaptatie: een blauwe auto in een grauwe stroom verkeer, een rode das in een donker steegje, een gele engerd die zijn zoveelste hulpeloze slachtoffer naar het leven staat... Het kleurenpalet van Sin City leidt een geheel eigen leven, en blijft niet alleen van begin tot eind de sfeer bepalen, maar ook de hele film door fascineren. De filmversie van Sin City blijkt evenzeer geslaagde kunst als Millers originele werk dat destijds was (en nog steeds is).



En laten we vooral de vele liters bloed, nu wit, dan weer rood op de kleurloze achtergrond niet vergeten. Want de zondige stad en haar sinistere inwoners bieden ook een keur aan excessief geweld, wat volledig in de sfeer van de film past. Tijdens Marv's wraakactie snijdt hij de ledematen van een man af en voert hem vervolgens aan zijn hond. Hartigan slaat een maniak letterlijk tot pulp na hem met blote handen ontmand te hebben. Het klinkt allemaal extreem gruwelijk, maar is zo stilistisch, soms zelfs cartoonesk, in beeld gebracht dat het de pret niet kan drukken en een geaccepteerd onderdeel van de film vormt. Immers, in de Stad der Zonde zijn zulke praktijken aan de orde van de dag.

Sin City is zonder twijfel één van de meest geslaagde graphic novel verfilmingen tot nu toe, zowel in haar vertaling van boek naar film als in de kwaliteit van de film an sich. Het predicaat 'visuele kunst' misstaat absoluut niet, terwijl de film bovendien een zeer onderhoudende actiefilm is met een dynamisch tempo, een cast van louter grote namen in topvorm en de nodige toepasselijke zwarte humor. Waar collegae als Alan Moore hun werk verminkt zagen worden door de harteloze filmindustrie mag Frank Miller zich gelukkig prijzen met een talentvolle regisseur als Robert Rodriguez die bewijst diens originele werk de volledige eer te bewijzen door dit om te zetten in een film die meer Millers stempel drukt dan zijn eigen. Of een dergelijke situatie zich in de toekomst voor zal doen bij vergelijkbare graphic novel adaptaties valt nog te bezien, maar naar het al aangekondigde Sin City 2 kan, ook door Miller zelf, terecht reikhalzend uitgekeken worden.