Posts tonen met het label emma stone. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label emma stone. Alle posts tonen
zaterdag 11 maart 2017
Oscars 2017: The Results
A little later than planned, here's the breakdown of just how accurate my well informed analyses/random guesses into the whole 2017 Oscar circus were. As a whole, I mostly agreed with the Academy's winning choices, but there were a number of wins - politically driven, I'm sure, which I don't even really mind (I just hate being in the wrong) - I disagree with vehemently. Oh well, it makes the whole annual affair that much more interesting...
Best Film:
First Choice: Correct. I didn't watch the ceremony live, so I didn't hear about the big winner screw-up until well after, but I never really doubted Moonlight winning. That movie deals with heavy themes like identity, ethnicity and sexuality, while La La Land is mostly plain fun. And the Academy's track record of rewarding plain fun is far from stellar.
Best Actor:
First Choice: Correct. Even though I wasn't wholly impressed by Casey's performance myself, I can say the same thing for the other nominees. All of them delivered strong performances, but none that will prove truly memorable. In this case, the buzz proved correct, and I just merrily went along with the buzz, I'll admit.
Best Actress:
First Choice: Incorrect. This choice I feel is undeserved. Stone did a fine job, but so did her male counterpart Gosling, also nominated (but for Best Actor, obviously). Point is, La La Land was a two-person job in terms of acting. In my mind, the pair carried the movie, not just the girl or the boy. Stone winning I feel is degrading to Gosling, who was equally up to his job, but is left in the cold. On the other hand, my choice, Natalie Portman, had to carry an entire movie by herself, demanding emotional intensity in every scene. She delivered just that, which makes Stone's win all the harder for me to bear. At least Portman already has one of those gold statues in her possession.
Second choice: Incorrect.
Best Supporting Actor:
First Choice: Correct. No surprise here. Though I sense some political motivation for both this and the next category may also have been involved, to prove #OscarsSoWhite wrong. I don't mind, I fully agree with both choices.
Best Supporting Actress:
First Choice: Incorrect. In this case it's clear why one should watch a movie before judging its performances. I didn't have that option, because Fences was released locally rather late in the awards season, well before I posted my predictions. If I had seen it earlier, Viola Davis would have been on top of my list. Quite a strong show!
Second choice: Incorrect.
Best Director:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Correct. Like I said, whoever wins Best Film won't win Best Director. I put all my money on Moonlight, but by my own reasoning, this one was gonna go to La La Land. Which it did.
Best Screenplay:
First Choice: Correct. In hindsight, I think the year's strongest script was Hell or High Water's. But I didn't think it would win.
Best Adapted Screenplay:
First Choice: Correct. As it should be.
Best Animated Film:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Incorrect. Now this one makes me mad. Zootopia was a great film, no doubt. But it wasn't in any way innovative, nor was its animation so superb as in my own two choices. I really feel Zootopia's underlying political message was what won the Academy over, rather than the actual animation which this category is supposed to honour. I remain convinced this was the year's biggest snub on the part of the Oscars, and I'll always defend both The Red Turtle and Kubo and the Two Strings over Zootopia.
Best Foreign Film:
First Choice: Incorrect. Also a politically motivated win, a clear anti-Trump statement. Director Ashgar Farhadi won, but wasn't allowed into the country to pick up his Oscar, making the USA look bad (and rightfully so). However, Toni Erdmann is definitely the better movie, and I've noticed most fellow critics tend to agree.
Second choice: Correct.
Best Cinematography:
First Choice: Correct. Here's where La La Land starts to take most of the technical acclaim.
Best Editing:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Incorrect. Okay, so not this one. But I was never very impressed with Hacksaw Ridge in whatever way.
Best Production Design:
First Choice: Correct.
Best Costume Design:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Correct. Poor Jackie really got screwed over well.
Best Hair and Make-up:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Correct. Like I said, Suicide Squad deserved to win and surprisingly enough, it did. I don't mind being wrong on this one.
Best Score:
First Choice: Correct. No-brainer.
Best Song:
First Choice: Correct. I preferred the other song for which La La Land got nominated though.
Best Sound Mixing:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Incorrect. Wow, this one came as an unwelcome surprise. Where's the time the sounds of Star Wars were the safest bet in the galaxy?
Best Sound Editing:
First Choice: Incorrect.
Second choice: Correct. Hmm, La La Land didn't actually win so many technical awards after all. I'm glad Arrival reaped some reward.
Best Visual Effects:
First Choice: Correct. Very obvious choice.
Best Documentary:
First Choice: Correct. Also no surprise.
Correct: 11
Second choice: 5
Incorrect: 5
Big reveal here is my number of Corrects and Correct Second Choices has remained the same compared to last year. So I remain consistent. But there's also no improvement. Story of my life I suppose.
zondag 11 mei 2014
Today's Review: The Amazing Spider-Man 2
The
Amazing Spider-Man 2: ***/*****, or 6/10
Now
that Marvel Studios' long term strategy has shown to pay off in the
most lucrative manner imaginable, it's no surprise to see rival
studios owning their own pieces of the Marvel pie try their luck with
a similar concept. As such, Sony faces the most challenging job at
universe building, as they own the rights to a franchise based around
a single character: Spider-Man. Fortunately for the studio, Spidey
has a wide array of friends and foes, allies and adversaries, to
choose from in order to construct a larger shared realm which may at
some point include movies that do not need the wallcrawler's presence
to stand on their own feet. However, such characters, good guys and
bad, will need to be introduced first to familiarize the audience
with their personalities and groom them for their own solo debuts in
later years. And so the crafting of a larger Spiderverse begins with
The Amazing Spider-Man 2, which hosts a plethora of new
characters and a threesome of rogues to enrich Peter Parker's life.
Problem is, for a freshly rebooted franchise which, after a single
movie that can be described as 'adequate' at best, still needs to
prove to the audience the validity of the rebooting process, the time
to start such universe building simply isn't ripe just yet. As a
result, the second Amazing Spidermovie feels like a convoluted,
incoherently structured piece that aims to be more than 'amazing',
while the audience still waits for that moniker to make good on its
promise.
In
the sequel, Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) has come to terms with his
powers and responsibilities acting as New York's superhuman guardian,
haunted by the vision of Captain Stacy, as he struggles to uphold his
promise to the deceased father of the love of his life, Gwen (Emma
Stone), to stay out of her existence in order to keep her safe from
the harm that comes with being Spider-Man. A strong-spirited and
intelligent young woman, Gwen is determined to embrace the dangers
involved with dating Peter, or otherwise to move one with her career
and leave him in the cold. This results in many a scene of fairly
engaging and recognizable lovers' quarrels that reveal director Marc
Webb's strengths in directing the identifiable romantic affairs of the
younger generation. The chemistry between Garfield and Stone is still
solid, though the same cannot be said for the writing of the former,
as Peter has moved on from being a socially awkward nerd to a rather
self-absorbed punk. Though his red-and-blue clad alter ego is
modelled after his comic book counterpart more closely and
convincingly than ever – webslinging moves, wisecracking puns and
all – Peter feels like he has changed in character a little too
much too fast, his occasional dickish behavior courtesy of a new team
of writers. While Stone's performance remains a joy to behold,
Garfield's oftentimes evokes more irritation than affection.
Spidey's
knack for getting those he cares about in trouble is quickly proven
as he's confronted by no less than three new villains in this movie,
each with his own personal baggage and history that needs some
exploration (especially if they are to be found worthy of reprising
their roles for later projects). The main antagonist, the volatile
and hotheaded Electro (Jamie Foxx), is given the most balanced bit of
background, in which he is revealed kind of as Peter Parker-gone-bad.
A lonely and socially isolated geek, his involuntary plunge in a vat
of genetically engineered electric eels (if you feel this sounds
silly, ask yourself whether it would if it involved spiders instead)
grants him powers beyond his wildest dreams, but as he hopes to
finally stand out from the crowd, those masses that worship his idol
Spider-Man reject him, forcing him to go on a electrostatic rampage
aimed at New York's favorite webspinner to get back at the world.
Though Foxx's performance, some times over-the-top while at others
more contained, leaves something to be desired, as does his rather
two-dimensional anger directed at Spider-man, Electro's colourful but
lethal sparkle shows make for a fancy visual style not seen in a
Spider-Man movie before.
What
has been seen before however is Harry Osborn, Peter's long time
friend and occasionally Spidey's nemesis. In Raimi's trilogy of
movies, Harry was given an arc all his own over the course of three
movies, building up to the conflict to be and Spider-Man's emotional
disarray that came with it. Not so in The Amazing Spider-Man 2,
where the same story is roughly being told in a single film, in a
much abbreviated form that does not do justice to the many decades of
comic book lore in which this close friendship annex hateful rivalry
slowly but surely evolved. When his father Norman (Chris Cooper), the
head of OsCorp Industries, dies as a result of a degenerative illness
that runs in the family, Harry (Dane DeHaan) gets reacquainted with
his childhood friend Peter as he offers his condolences. A more
elaborate backstory is inferred, but as it is only the subject of the
briefest conversation it is hard to truly care about the relationship
between Peter and Harry. The latter swiftly becomes CEO of OsCorp
where he finds himself thrown in an arena of board intrigue and
backstabbing conspiracies to remove him from office, as he tries to
find a cure for what killed his dad and all too soon will end his
life prematurely too. The only thing standing between him and an
untimely demise appears to be the blood of genetically engineered
spiders, company property that was deemed lost, so Spider-Man's blood
appears to be the only cure still available. As the disease starts to
corrupt both his body and mind, Harry's friendship with Peter turns
sour when his buddy will not help him get in touch with the
wallcrawler to acquire that pivotal transfusion. Eventually more
drastic measures must be taken for survival and Harry transforms into
the maniacal Green Goblin, hellbent on wrecking Peter's life,
especially when he discovers his secret identity. DeHaan proves quite
up to the task of portraying the sympathetic Harry, who grows ever
more frustrated as his quest to save his own life is thwarted by both
those on his payroll and his oldest friend. He also visibly shows to
have had a blast playing the crazed Goblin, making DeHaan's
contributions to the acting front more sizable than Garfield's
haphazard performances, though both characters are admittedly driven
by less than stellar writing.
Last
and least of the trio of baddies is Rhino, a Russian criminal played
by Paul Giamatti (who also makes it abundantly clear he's enjoying
himself tremendously), whose presence feels more of an afterthought
added by the studio to get that universe building going, as he adds
little of relevance to the plot otherwise. Appearing only in the
beginning of the film as a violent smuggler who's ridiculed by
Spidey, and at the end donning stupendously large battle armour, the
character proves the finest example of how not to introduce
characters meant to form part of a larger whole later on, if you want
the audience to invest in them. It is made clear in the climax of the
film Rhino is the first member of Harry's team of villains meant to
destroy Spider-Man, a plot line which is already stated to carry over
in the next entry into the series, as well as in the announced
Sinister Six spin-off. However, this attempt to foreshadow
such future fare backfires on The Amazing Spider-Man 2 as a
film on its own.
If
you compare the first few trailers with the final product, you'll
notice the film feels to be lacking not only many scenes but also
entire story threads that would have driven the plot into a very
different direction. Scenes between Harry, his father and Peter
promised much more intricate relations between the characters than
what was ultimately seen on screen. Likewise, characters' scenes were
filmed but dropped, including the introduction of Mary Jane, while
others were shortened dramatically, like Harry's secretary Felicia
Hardy (who fans will know as Spidey's love affair/part time enemy
Black Cat) suffered. The undeniable fact is, with multiple foes, a
tumultuous love life and relationship with assorted family, plus a
continuing search for his roots and the fate of his parents carried
over from the predecessor, there was more than enough going on in the
plot of the film already without the studio's obvious insistence of
setting up future films as well. As a result, few of the many plot
lines get their chance to stand out amidst the convoluted whole that
now is The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Of course, there's some fine
action scenes and shows of superhero spectacle, while the webslinging
never looked better. But in most other respects, the film too often
feels like coming up short considerably. Arguably, Sony will make
more time to craft the upcoming films into a more coherent and
consistent whole, as the element of universe building was rushed into
this movie's plot while production was already underway. For now
however, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has ended up a Spider-Man
film that quickly branches off into an advertisement for upcoming
Spider-Man films, hurting its own ending, despite the otherwise
tragic climax, which under less padded conditions might have made
this the emotionally most powerful Spiderfilm as yet. Robbed of its
right to exist as a separate entity, The Amazing Spider-Man 2
failed in that regard, nor does it bode well for Spidey's future.
And
to make matters worse, some viewers will be treated to a version of
the film with end credits containing a scene for the next X-Men
film, which causes this movie to feel even more like a commercial for
future superhero flicks, even wholly unrelated ones...
Labels:
action,
amazing spider-man,
amazing spider-man 2,
andrew garfield,
comic book,
Dane DeHaan,
emma stone,
jamie foxx,
marc webb,
Marvel,
paul giamatti,
spider-man,
superheroes
dinsdag 12 november 2013
Today's News: three new Amazing Spidey pics (sort of)
Here's some old news I posted on MovieScene. Blame circumstances for not allowing me to find the time to update this blog more regularly at present.
http://www.moviescene.nl/p/151546/nieuwe_fotos_the_amazing_spider-man_2
Pretty teasy pics. Trying to get us more interested and even pre-hyped up for this reboot sequel. Apparently there's emotional friction between Peter (Andrew Garfield) and Gwen (Emma Stone), as there would be after the events of the previous installment, which witnessed a personal loss for the pair of them and a solemn promise suggested to be broken soon because of their continuing mutual love. I personally hope whatever is going on between them isn't going to cause Gwen to do something that gets herself killed, as is her fate. If you think you got spoilered now, don't blame me. Chances are good Gwen Stacy died in Spider-Man lore well before you were born, dear reader. However, I like Stone's Gwen, way more than I ever liked Mary Jane or Kirsten Dunst. I hope we'll stick to her for at least one more film.
Then there's a new picture of the movie's main villain, Electro (Jamie Foxx). I'm still not entirely happy with his look, but this is about as close as you can get to his look from the Ultimate Spider-Man line of comics without getting too ridiculous: plus, it certainly beats the goofy lightning bolt costume he wore in the regular Spidey-verse. Either way, Foxx is a solid actor, which for me is the main thing in this case.
Then there's the funny picture of Spider-Man playing fireman. A good chance he's squaring off against said antagonist in this scene, keeping in mind the natural dynamics between water and electricity. Of course, the hat isn't necessary, but it serves as a reminder of A: the fun aspect of the Spider-Man comics and movies, and B: the fact that Spider-Man has always had a tumultuous relationship with public service institutions like this. Remember his arduous affair with the police in the last film? Wearing this hat could help him improve his public image with the good people of NYC, while using a fire hose to save their city from an electric guy. After all, the Spider-Man movies, new and old, are rife with the matter of a vigilante protagonist who seeks to use his powers for good despite being disliked for it by government agencies, but still winning the love of the everyday people he protects and serves for all his valiant efforts. This shot hearkens back to the likes of the train scene in Spider-Man 2, the cheesy 'if you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us' line from a random passersby in Raimi's first Spider-Man, and the myriad examples of big-ass American flags in all of the Spidey movies to date. Like it or not, it comes with this particular red, white and blue hero's mythos. And let's face it: it's not nearly as in-your-face as a superhero wearing the American flag all over his costume!
zondag 22 juli 2012
Uncle Ben dies again
The Amazing Spider-Man:
***/*****, or 7/10
One of
the most respectable and thoughtful things about this year's biggest
Marvel movie, The Avengers, is the way it was set up in the
first place, introducing the various superheroes individually before
assembling the team itself, thus establishing a shared, epic
cinematic Marvel universe very close in feel to the comic books it is
based on, yet not so convoluted as to alienate audiences unfamiliar
with the wondrous world of Marvel Comics. It was a huge gamble, but
fortunately for the studios involved and for the many fans of the
characters and their films, it payed off big time, smashing many box
office records, thus paving the way for a 'Phase 2', another large
scale five year plan, not only adding sequels to the Iron Man,
Thor, Captain America and Avengers films, but
also kickstarting more Marvel projects to tie in with this brave new
world on film, including Guardians of the Galaxy, Ant-Man
and Nick Fury movies. Such foresight and careful planning
unfortunately can't be detected in the Sony Pictures' franchise of
that other much beloved Marvel character, Spider-Man, who after an
initial hugely successful trilogy of movies ingratiously was denied a
third sequel because of creative differences between the studio and
the top people involved, making the former take the much dreaded
'reboot road' instead, restarting the movie franchise all over again
only a decade after it first originated. It's a kick in the groin,
not only for the webslinger himself, but also for his legions of fans
and even regular audiences across the globe, who now get treated to
another take on a character who's origin story is no secret to
anybody.
Of
course a different approach had to be taken to avoid the new flick,
now titled The Amazing Spider-Man (and so at least respecting
Spider-Man's first own comic book series of the same name), feeling
too much of a déjà vu compared to what we've seen before. Warning!
Spoilers! Undoubtedly inspired by the success of the recent
rebooting of the Batman franchise, the studio opted for a darker
beginning for the otherwise merry and witty superhero, heavily
involving the absence of his biological parents – something Raimi's
trilogy largely ignored – who left their little son Peter Parker
(now played by Andrew Garfield) to be raised by his Aunt May (Sally
Field) and Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) and were supposedly killed in a
plane crash shortly after their departure. Drawing inspiration from
the Ultimate Spider-Man line of comic books, Peter's parents
were involved in shady genetic experiments involving the
crossbreeding of humans with animal species, which is of course what
the origin of Spider-Man is all about. Unfortunately the subplot
concerning Peter's mommy and daddy is largely left unresolved the
moment Peter's investigation into his past leads him to his father's
close colleague Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans), a one-armed scientist
working for the sinister Oscorp Company, further attempting to
crossbreed species, in his case humans and lizards, in an admittedly
somewhat silly, comic-y attempt to regrow his lost limb, with dire
consequences.
However,
under the direction of Marc Webb (I'll refrain from using 'nomen
est omen' remarks here, since that has been done to death
already), whose director's credit of importance prior to this gig
only included the acclaimed romantic comedy (500) Days of Summer,
it's not all creepy experiments and traumatic childhood incidents
that form the prime ingredients of Peter Parker becoming Spider-Man.
Clearly establishing Peter, performed by Andrew Garfield of The
Social Network fame, to be a typical high school kid, Webb also
finds time for lighter scenes developing the romance between him and
Gwen Stacy (the beautiful and talented Emma Stone). Peter's previous
movie girlfriend Mary Jane Watson is left out altogether in favor of
having him hook up with his original lady love from the comics, even
though this might confuse audiences since Gwen was already featured
in Raimi's Spider-Man 3 (then played by Bryce Dallas Howard).
Stone plays off wonderfully against Garfield's Peter Parker: unlike
ex-Peter Tobey Maguire, he seems more appropriately aged to
convincingly pull off a high school teenager, and he does a better
job at playing both Peter and Spidey, carefully balancing between
being too much of a nerd and too cool a superhero to believably be a
nerd in real life. However, unlike Stone, Garfield is found guilty of
overacting in his display of various ticks and goofy mannerisms when
first feeling spider powers within: but playing a regular human
being, Stone just has it easier, while the task of carrying the
picture falls on Garfield's shoulders, which he does it adequately
enough. The lighthearted scenes of teen angst and young love between
the pair form a stark contrast with the gritty look into Peter's
family issues, but they are a necessary part of recreating the
Spider-Man persona, since the webslinger was always a lighter, easy
going and cheerful superhero to begin with. In fact, it's clear Webb
has more experience with romance and teen drama than he does with
superheroism, considering the scenes between Garfield and Stone on
many occasion feel more compelling than the action stuff, which of
course is also a major must-have for any superhero movie. Plus, the
smart and ambitious blonde Gwen is a welcome reprieve from the naive,
childhood traumatized redhead Mary Jane from the previous films:
unlike the latter Gwen does not find herself in grave danger at the
hands of nasty supervillains at least twice per film, at which point
her only solution seems to scream for her hero to come and rescue her
very loudly. Apparently there was still some room for improvement
left in Raimi's otherwise superior tackling of the franchise, which
Webb eagerly accepts by making Gwen an independent young woman who's
at least as smart as her boyfriend and shows much more tact and
discretion when the going gets tough.
And
tough it gets for poor Peter Parker. First, he has to contend with
the bite of a genetically enhanced spider, which is what you get for
sneaking into a lab which is clearly marked off-limits due to
biohazards. The result is Peter not only gets superhuman strength and
reflexes and the ability to walk on walls (even when wearing shoes),
he also gets a lot grumpier, to the point of treating his loving Aunt
and Uncle in a very ungrateful manner (the many occasions where he
immediately plunders the fridge when coming home, all the while
ignoring their sound advice, are a good example of his douchery), as
well as breaking an excessive amount of stuff both at home and in
school. Obviously, this leads to the obligatory life lesson that with
great power must come great responsibility, a value the audience
already had learned in obnoxious preachy detail in Raimi's films, but
is also too important an element in Spider-Man's origin to be
ignored. And so, Uncle Ben bites the dust again, shot dead by a
thief, and Peter knows he shouldn't be an ass and help people with
his new found abilities instead of acting like a dick. Only took an
hour of the film to set this up, thus making half the film a
redundancy for retelling things that didn't need retold, except for
the mounting sexual tension between Gwen and Peter. Fortunately, from
here on out Webb gets the opportunity to develop the story more as he
sees fit, now that the back story is firmly on people's minds again
(though it can only be called arrogant on the studio's part to think
it never was in the first place). However, there's still plenty of
unresolved things left, so we can only assume the truth about Peter's
parents is left for the unavoidable sequel. Considering the dull way
it was handled here, that's not something to look forward to too
much.
After
Uncle Ben has died, Peter looks for the criminal who did it, acting
like a vigilante and beating up people who were not at all involved,
though many of them were caught in the act of unlawful behavior
anyway. This gets him on the radar of police captain Stacy (Denis
Leary), Gwen's father, who feels nobody but law enforcement should
clean up society's sinister side. This ideological conflict between
Peter and Stacy is one of the movie's strongest additions to the
overall Spider-Man film franchise, though in itself it's not
entirely new, considering a similar difference of opinion was
witnessed in the previous trilogy between Peter and newspaper edition
J. Jonah Jameson (a beloved normal human character from the comic
books who was present throughout Raimi's films, but sadly remains
completely absent in The Amazing Spider-Man), but is handled
on a more serious note here instead of ending in skits of comic
relief as it did before. It also adds fascinating but underused
conflicts of interests for Gwen, who has to choose between her
loyalty to her father and her love for her boyfriend. However,
Spider-Man's main problem in this film lies not in the police issuing
a warrant for his arrest, but in a scientist losing his objective
thinking because of his obsession for personal enhancement on a
genetic scale.
Like
Gwen Stacy, Curt Connors was already introduced in the previous
Spider-Man films, but was never put to full use. Originally,
Raimi had planned a fourth Spider-Man film which would see him
evolve into the bad guy Lizard. Ironically, Raimi left, but Lizard
stayed and is now the first supervillain Webb's new Spider-Man faces.
As an introductory nemesis, Lizard may not have been the best choice,
especially considering the rather ridiculous diabolical ploy of his
to release a bioweapon that would turn the population of New York
City into lizard people like himself (and what is the silly deal with
him attracting all those little lizards in the sewers? I'll have you
know under normal circumstances lizards would just die in such an
environment. Shenanigans!). However, in relation to the subplot taken
from Ultimate Spider-Man concerning Peter's father dabbling in
biogenetics and the personal connection between Peter and himself
this implies, he's the logical choice, considering the other
available Spidey foes, Norman Osborn/Green Goblin and Otto
Octavius/Dr. Octopus, have already been used in Raimi's films (though
one of them does get his fair share of references and possible sequel
set-ups in this film). Rhys Ifans portrays the “mad scientist”
affectionately as a sympathetic but obsessed man who too desperately
means to improve his body, which affects his mind as he finds his
judgment impaired when his solution transforms him into a huge lizard
man. Oddly enough, unlike the Lizard of the comics, he seems to fully
retain his mental faculties instead of becoming more beast than man,
which makes it all the harder to accept his final weird wicked
scheme. However, the creature he ends up becoming does make for a
decent amount of action scenes, including a rampage on a bridge, a
high school confrontation between him and Spider-Man and an
impressive though overly digital final battle on top of a skyscraper
when he fights both Spidey and Captain Stacy. However, Webb
ultimately disappoints where action is concerned, considering there's
not nearly as much fight sequences as one would expect from a
superhero movie, mostly because of the excessive focus on retelling
Spidey's origin story and dragging his parents into the mix. At least
the action that is present feels dynamic enough, but we would have
wished for more. Better luck next time.
And
there will unmistakably be a next time, considering the amount of
unresolved plot lines and the extra scene after the main end credits
which sets up the next movie's bad guy very similarly to the way The
Avengers did, except the precise identity of this villain still
remains somewhat of a mystery (quite frustrating if you're a long
time avid comic book fan like me). However, it's clear this new
Spider-Man franchise, like its predecessor but unlike the
superior Avengers franchise, doesn't look much further into
its own future than a few years down the road, a tactic that, if not
changed soon, will undoubtedly lead to yet another unnecessary reboot
in the next decade. Unlike the many superheroes that form the
Avengers, Spider-Man still stands alone, so if it's amazement
you're after in your marvels, this is not where you should look for
it.
And
watch the trailer here:
Labels:
action,
amazing spider-man,
andrew garfield,
curt connors,
emma stone,
gwen stacy,
lizard,
marc webb,
Marvel,
peter parker,
rhys ifans,
spider,
spider-man,
spiderman,
superhero
zondag 12 februari 2012
The Amazing Spider-Man trailer impressions
Latest trailer for the arachnid epic
spins a web of questions: will it be Amazing, or just Spider-Man?
Now that the first official trailer
(not to be confused with last year's lenghty teaser, which was based
more on characters and showed little actual Spidey), is out, I find
my common sense tingling as to whether this premature reboot will
deliver an equally carefully weighed balance of characters and FX, as
well as humour and drama, as Sam Raimi's first film did ten years
ago. After all, it's only been five years since Spider-Man 3 and
people undoubtedly will still link this movie to the ones that came
before, even if they're aware Amazing Spider-Man will restart the
franchise. Judging from the trailer footage, some elements from the
previous film(s) have been retained, either to help guide the
audience back into this side of the Marvel Universe, or to confuse
viewers with leftovers from the previous trilogy mixed with a
retelling of how Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) became Spider-Man.
So what glimpses did the trailer
offer? With regard to familiar characters and situations we have been
introduced to in Raimi's Spider-films we will be refamiliarized with:
-Curt
Connors: the one-armed college teacher and scientist was
first introduced in Spider-Man 2, played by Dylan Baker. In both the
second and third film, he served as a sort of science mentor to Peter
Parker, helping him to remember that with great power (i.e. Peter's
scientific mental capacities) also comes the responsibility not to be
lazy. He also provided vital plot information when he got the dubious
honour of serving a purely expositionary role explaining away the
symbiote and its need to bond with a host to feed off his negative
emotions when Peter donned the black suit in the third film. It's
obvious his appearances in both films helped pave the way to the rise
of Spidey's reptilian nemesis Lizard. The fans have been expecting
the poor doctor to transfrom into his green alter-ego for a while
now, and it finally happens in this film, so the patience has payed
off (if you like Lizard of course). However, this is not the Curt
Connors we know: played by Rhys Ifans this time, it's a reimagining
of the same character, which means his relationship with Peter will
also have to be reimagined, this time via Peter's father Richard
instead of just college. In fact, when this movie will establish
Spider-Man's origins all over again while retconning the previous
films completely, that means Lizard will be Spidey's first
super-powered antagonist. I'm not sure Lizard is compelling enough as
an introductory bad guy. At least he has the personal connection with
Peter to create more emotional impact for his character, but will he
be as much of a believable threat as Spider-Man's quintessential arch
enemies Dr. Octopus or Green Goblin were in Raimi's films? We'll have
to wait and see...
(By the way, like any other Spidey
fanboy I can whine about Lizard's look in the film and say this isn't
the Lizard I grew up with (which it isn't), but I'm not gonna do
that. There's only so many ways you can portray a human/lizard hybrid
on the big screen and have him seem realistic and expressive enough
to make you feel anything for him. Let's see him in action first
before shouting yay or nay.)
-Oscorp
Industries: speaking of the Green Goblin, the trailer
clearly establishes Oscorp to be present in more than just a cameo
role. Connors has a job there, but does this mean one of the Osborns
makes an appearance in this film? That would most likely alienate
audiences who feel this movie builds on what came before (as Lizard
seems to do here). After all, both founder Norman Osborn (the first
Green Goblin) and his son Harry Osborn (the second Green Goblin), who
also happened to be Peter's best friend, met their demise in Raimi's
trilogy. So who's running Oscorp in this film? Either Norman Osborn
will be re-introduced, and possibly be set up as a potential main
villain for the next Spider-Man film, or the matter will be
ignored entirely and the name Oscorp will serve largely as a sort of
bonus to the fans without being addressed as a major plot point other
than being Connors' employer, as well as Richard Parker's (more on
this below). As for who has Peter's back at school when he gets
bullied, it won't be Harry. It seems unlikely Norman, or even Harry,
in a similar fashion to Connors, would follow up on traits
established in the previous films, thus suddenly being alive again,
which would be the main reason the writers decided to leave both of
them out. Incidentally, we may not find out much about the Osborns'
role at Oscorp, since it seems Spider-Man and Lizard do a good job
destroying its headquarters while duking it out together there in
what will undoubtedly bt the epic conclusion of this film.
-The
Stacy family: but let's shy away from the bad guys for a
while and focus more on Peter Parker's personal life. Mary Jane is
nowhere to be seen. Gwen Stacy has replaced her as Peter's love
interest. This too points to the fact this movie will be a complete
and utter reboot of the franchise, since MJ and Peter were still very
much in love last time we saw them despite all the issues between
them in the third film (and boy, were there many!). Gwen already
appeared in the third film (played by Bryce Dallas Howard), but only
as a date for Peter to annoy MJ with. This time around, Gwen (played
by Emma Stone) is the Original Spidey Girlfriend, as ironically she
was in the comics, a looooong time ago (she got viciously killed off
by the Green Goblin in 1973). This means the relationship between
Peter and Gwen will also be re-established.The big question then is:
will Gwen be aware of Peter's dual life as Spider-Man, and how will
she find out? Judging from the trailer, she knows, given the shots of
Peter and Gwen discussing Lizard and Peter's involvement in his
existence. At least Gwen is more intelligent than Mary Jane,
considering it took her only half a movie to find out about Peter's
secret identity, wheras MJ only found out at the end of the second
film. Gwen may not be as blond as she seems...
Also revamped will be the relationship
between Peter and Gwen's father, police captain George Stacy. It
seems the movie will focus a lot on this duo's dynamics; George
(played by Denis Leary) feeling Spider-Man is a masked vigilante
taking matters into his own hands instead of letting the cops do
their jobs, which doesn't sit well with him and eventually makes him
issue an arrest warrant for our poor friendly neighbourhood
Spider-Man. This is a darker take on Mr. Stacey than we're used to:
in the original comics he seemed more of a dear old man, who might
not have agreed with Spider-Man, but he didn't openly oppose him in
this brutal a fashion. Stacy also appeared in the previous film
(played by Zefram Cochrane James Cromwell), where he undoubtedly had less problems
with Spidey's approach after he saved his daughter's life. This new
version of Stacy as a younger, tougher man seems more in line with
the Ultimate Spider-Man comics, in which he was murdered by an
impostor wearing a Spider-Man costume, which led Gwen to hate
Spider-Man. Could it be the new movie takes this route and sees
Captain Stacy killed and Spidey somehow being implicated, leading to
tension between Peter and his girl Gwen? Or will Spidey save Gwen's
life once more, making Captain Stacy his fan? Or could it even be
that Gwen actually dies as she did before, with Peter being unable to
save her and Stacy declaring war on him? And what role will Lizard
play in all this? Interesting line of questions, and proof that the
writers most likely did well shying away from the Mary Jane routine.
-The
Parkers: it's obvious that this movie will be a total
reboot, which is why it will also see the family dynamics of the
Parker family retold. Both the teaser and the trailer have made it
very clear that this will involve the fate of Peter's parents. Raimi
never felt the need to get them involved in his origin story, and he
just ignored them: Peter lived with his aunt and uncle, his parents
are gone/dead/whatever, and that's that. So far so good. But not this
film, which will tell us more about his parents, though it will
deviate completely from the 'secret agent' history in the comics:
orginally Richard and Mary were agents involved with SHIELD who were
lost on a mission against the Marvel super villain the Red Skull, but
that's definitely not gonna happen. After all, the copyright
involving both SHIELD and the Red Skull is not in the hands of Sony
Pictures who own the Spider-Man movie rights at present. Both names
have already been heavily featurd in other recent Marvel movies, and
will be again for sure (need I say Avengers here?).
Judging from the trailer, it's likely
the movie will turn towards the Ultimate Marvel Universe some more
and will feature Peter's parents, or at least his father Richard, as
scientists working on sleazy genetic experiments under the employ of
Oscorp. What this will mean for Peter and Spidey's origins remains to
be seen, but it's possible his father messed with his genes in this
movie as well, and Connors could be involved. The trailer establishes
Richard and Connors being colleagues, which would also help to set up
a personal relationship between Peter and Connors that is completely
different from the one in the previous films. Plus, it could mean
Richard was partially responsible for the creation of Lizard. The
trailer clearly states that Peter himself definitely will be somehow,
considering the shots in the trailer of Peter and Connors talking
physics together, indicating Peter will provide Connors with the
formula that will turn him into that big ol' reptile creature, thus
once again making Spidey feel bad and having his excessively strong
sense of responsibility leading him on a quest to set things right
again before people start dying, given the line 'I gotta stop him
because I created him'. As for who's responsible for Spider-Man's
existence, it seems Connors knows something: ''If you want the truth,
Peter, come and get it', he says in the trailer. What exactly the
truth is, we won't know for sure until the movie hits theatres, but
judging from the teaser, there at least is a genuine spider involved.
Besides his parents, Peter's aunt and
uncle are naturally back, and it seems their role as Peter's moral
compass hasn't changed much, though it hasn't yet been established
how Uncle Ben will die, which he will of course, since this is
basically the event that defined Peter's role as Spider-Man. If Ben
lives, 'shenanigans' says I.
So there you have it: a lof of old
stuff in a new form, and this is just from the trailer! It seems the
director has his job cut out for him making a comprehensive feature
film out of a character mess like this without turning people off
about what they think they know about who Spider-Man is supposed to
be. If we go solely with a 'nomen est omen' attitude, Marc Webb will
surely create an action-packed blockbuster funfest of a movie worthy
to compete with the celebrated “original trilogy” (though the
third movie sadly did little to merit such a description). This first
trailer shows that at this point it can go either way: it might be a
brooding, character-driven 'Spider-Man Begins' with enough humour to
convince audiences Spidey is still that fun webslinging crime fighter
with his usual merry attitude, or it might be 'Spider-Man Rising',
with too much emphasis placed on the shady parts of the Parker family
legacy, re-explaining the already overly familiar origin story by
adding extra baggage to it and ultimately failing to find the right
mix of fun and drama to capture audience sympathy (which would be
Spider-Man 3's problem in a nutshell). Mr. Webb surely must remember
that with a great budget also comes great responsibility., and with a
great character come great expectations...
http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/theamazingspiderman/
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)














